LinuxQuestions.org
Share your knowledge at the LQ Wiki.
Go Back   LinuxQuestions.org > Forums > Linux Forums > Linux - Software
User Name
Password
Linux - Software This forum is for Software issues.
Having a problem installing a new program? Want to know which application is best for the job? Post your question in this forum.

Notices


Reply
  Search this Thread
Old 03-09-2004, 12:05 PM   #1
Yell0w_c0w
LQ Newbie
 
Registered: Mar 2004
Posts: 14

Rep: Reputation: 0
RPM vs compiled source


Hello, I was wondering what is the main difference between installing an RPM and compiling a source code. I noticed that when you istall an RPM it checks for "dependencies" and stuff like that, while compiled sources you don't need dependencies?

Im confused. For the same progra, why don't both have dependencies...
 
Old 03-09-2004, 12:11 PM   #2
trickykid
LQ Guru
 
Registered: Jan 2001
Posts: 24,149

Rep: Reputation: 235Reputation: 235Reputation: 235
Re: RPM vs compiled source

Quote:
Originally posted by Yell0w_c0w
Hello, I was wondering what is the main difference between installing an RPM and compiling a source code. I noticed that when you istall an RPM it checks for "dependencies" and stuff like that, while compiled sources you don't need dependencies?

Im confused. For the same progra, why don't both have dependencies...
Well, compiling from source you can run into dependency issues. Its just that RPM's are a package management type source where your installing the already compiled binaries which usually have in the script to check for the required programs or libs, etc.

When compiling from source, it can fail when running ./configure but even when its checking, if it doesn't find something it needs, it doesn't always error out but maybe later down the road when you try to run the app or such. Just all depends on what your installing.
 
Old 03-09-2004, 12:15 PM   #3
Yell0w_c0w
LQ Newbie
 
Registered: Mar 2004
Posts: 14

Original Poster
Rep: Reputation: 0
Re: Re: RPM vs compiled source

Aaah interestng

Quote:
Originally posted by trickykid
Well, compiling from source you can run into dependency issues. Its just that RPM's are a package management type source where your installing the already compiled binaries which usually have in the script to check for the required programs or libs, etc.

When compiling from source, it can fail when running ./configure but even when its checking, if it doesn't find something it needs, it doesn't always error out but maybe later down the road when you try to run the app or such. Just all depends on what your installing.
 
  


Reply


Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off



Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Compiled Apache2 from source... emptystrings Linux - Software 1 11-17-2004 02:44 PM
uninstall apache 1.3 that was compiled from source? rgiggs Slackware 5 11-15-2004 03:48 AM
source compiled debian ruwach Debian 4 02-24-2004 12:51 AM
delete compiled source killi Slackware 8 05-15-2003 09:21 AM
Uninstalling software thats been compiled from source burt Linux - Software 5 10-17-2002 03:18 PM


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 08:15 AM.

Main Menu
Advertisement
My LQ
Write for LQ
LinuxQuestions.org is looking for people interested in writing Editorials, Articles, Reviews, and more. If you'd like to contribute content, let us know.
Main Menu
Syndicate
RSS1  Latest Threads
RSS1  LQ News
Twitter: @linuxquestions
Facebook: linuxquestions Google+: linuxquestions
Open Source Consulting | Domain Registration