Linux - SoftwareThis forum is for Software issues.
Having a problem installing a new program? Want to know which application is best for the job? Post your question in this forum.
Welcome to LinuxQuestions.org, a friendly and active Linux Community.
You are currently viewing LQ as a guest. By joining our community you will have the ability to post topics, receive our newsletter, use the advanced search, subscribe to threads and access many other special features. Registration is quick, simple and absolutely free. Join our community today!
Note that registered members see fewer ads, and ContentLink is completely disabled once you log in.
If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us. If you need to reset your password, click here.
Having a problem logging in? Please visit this page to clear all LQ-related cookies.
Introduction to Linux - A Hands on Guide
This guide was created as an overview of the Linux Operating System, geared toward new users as an exploration tour and getting started guide, with exercises at the end of each chapter.
For more advanced trainees it can be a desktop reference, and a collection of the base knowledge needed to proceed with system and network administration. This book contains many real life examples derived from the author's experience as a Linux system and network administrator, trainer and consultant. They hope these examples will help you to get a better understanding of the Linux system and that you feel encouraged to try out things on your own.
Click Here to receive this Complete Guide absolutely free.
Help!!! i have just installed rh 9 and my rpms wont install i have tried a few different rpms from fresh rpm and none of them work...they start to read the rpm and then it disapears....im alittle lost. i tried through command line and it told me the gpg key was missing. im goin insane...and i like rpms so i dont wanna just deal with it please help...thanx cg
Who's GPG key was missing? Packages that are GPG-signed are somewhat more "trusted" opposed to packages that only have a separate md5sum. Importing the GPG key or disabling checking the GPG signature should fix it.
I suggest checking out apt4rpm and Red Carpet for automatic dependency resolution until you get used to resolving them yourself. Then ask about installing a certain program (after reading how to aks questions, of course) and you can get better answers to your questions.;
thanx for the replies.....
!. to big nate i did a -q and also a -K and this was the result
[cg@localhost cg]$ rpm -q gkrellm-2.1.10-fr1.i386.rpm
package gkrellm-2.1.10-fr1.i386.rpm is not installed
[cg@localhost cg]$ rpm -K gkrellm-2.1.10-fr1.i386.rpm
gkrellm-2.1.10-fr1.i386.rpm: (SHA1) DSA sha1 md5 (GPG) NOT OK (MISSING KEYS: GPG#e42d547b)
ok i tried it and i picked the wrong file to use as an example cause it was installed but i tried it with xine which was the actuall reason all this started...lol...here is the result
[cg@localhost cg]$ rpm -q gkrellm
[cg@localhost cg]$ rpm -q xine
package xine is not installed
[cg@localhost cg]$ rpm -K xine-0.9.21-fr1.i386.rpm
xine-0.9.21-fr1.i386.rpm: (SHA1) DSA sha1 md5 (GPG) NOT OK (MISSING KEYS: GPG#e42d547b)
hey thanx for that it started to install now i have to take care of my dependencies which i can deal with but i still am confused as to why it works like that but not by double clicking...i would really like to disable the gpg so i can just double click alittle easier than all the typin...lol i know im lazy but hey if i can do it does anyone know how to disable it......the -K option i was told was the checksig for the rpm a friend told me to try that and it would tell me why it wasnt workin....if anyone can tell me how to disable the gpg i would love to see if that would work
thanx for the help.....cg
Distribution: Gentoo, Debian, Ubuntu, Red Hat/CentOS
Well crush I gotta say I am not for disabling gpg. I am kind of a gpg fan though so I am a little biased. I am not sure where the config file is for rpm/gpg. I do know that it is very simple to import keys to rpm (although I am not sure if there is a gui way to do it, when I import a key I go with a cli)
see man rpm for details.
fwiw, gpg is a great way to verify you are getting a good package from a reputable author. If you are like most folks you will usually only dl from a few repositories so a couple of extra text files with pub keys on them will not take up too much room and once a particular key is imported you will (should) never have to import it again. just my $.02
If you are really hell bent on getting rid of gpg...try
and look to see which dirs are listed and start digging around for a config file. I am sure it is probably as simple as commenting out a line.
Is the gpg contained in the name of the file? The reason I ask is
that because of modem troubles I am downloading to xp and
cp to mdk9.1. During the process I renamed opera-7.11-20030515
.4-shared-qt.i386.rpm to opera7.rpm. The install worked fine but
I got a message about a missing "gpg". Is there any harm in
renaming the rpm?
Distribution: Gentoo, Debian, Ubuntu, Red Hat/CentOS
Nope. The gpg key is a seperate file althogether. A small cookie is in the rpm and it is verified against the copy of the public key that is dl'd seperately and stored on your key ring. that cookie can only be related to the orig key therefore if the cookie is there then you know the person who made the package and is distributing it is legit. gpg is cool in general go to gpg.org and read more...I think you may find it, as I do, indespensible.