Linux - SoftwareThis forum is for Software issues.
Having a problem installing a new program? Want to know which application is best for the job? Post your question in this forum.
Welcome to LinuxQuestions.org, a friendly and active Linux Community.
You are currently viewing LQ as a guest. By joining our community you will have the ability to post topics, receive our newsletter, use the advanced search, subscribe to threads and access many other special features. Registration is quick, simple and absolutely free. Join our community today!
Note that registered members see fewer ads, and ContentLink is completely disabled once you log in.
If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us. If you need to reset your password, click here.
Having a problem logging in? Please visit this page to clear all LQ-related cookies.
Introduction to Linux - A Hands on Guide
This guide was created as an overview of the Linux Operating System, geared toward new users as an exploration tour and getting started guide, with exercises at the end of each chapter.
For more advanced trainees it can be a desktop reference, and a collection of the base knowledge needed to proceed with system and network administration. This book contains many real life examples derived from the author's experience as a Linux system and network administrator, trainer and consultant. They hope these examples will help you to get a better understanding of the Linux system and that you feel encouraged to try out things on your own.
Click Here to receive this Complete Guide absolutely free.
i imagine that no one will ever be able to answer this question. but here's hoping.
ok i'm sure we've all seen this. you go to install something, type in
> rpm -ivh biglongpackagename.rpm
and then the thing yells at you for not having a bunch of other crap installed. i hate linux for this.
anyways for this particular case i am installing gaim
> rpm -ivh gaim-nameofsomesort.rpfreekinm
then it yells at me for not having gtk2 or libspell installed.
i search rpmfind for gtk2 and try to install it and it tells me i already have it installed. crap so i move on. i sear rpmfind for libspell. what a suprise.. no such thing exists. did i mention i hate linux.
ok so dont go off on some tangent yelling at me for not liking linux. and lets not worry about the libspell thing either, i've fixed worse problems.
lets worry about this: how do i get rpm to know that i have gtk2 already installed?
why does it tell me gtk2 is not there when i go to install gaim, then when i go to install gtk2 it tells me it is there already?
this crap happens to me all the time. i'm sick of it, and i want to see how other people handle it. (or am i just cursed)
The libraries the installation thinks are missing, may be in a different location on your system than where the installation looks for them. This can happen when an installation package is meant for a distribution other than the one you're using. If you're lucky, the libraries are in the same place in both distributions, but sometimes they aren't. So yes, the stuff is already installed, just like the message says when you go to install the "missing" items, but the problem is that the program you're trying to install doesn't know where to look for it.
I'm sorry to say I don't know how to solve the problem. I've just given up on installing MANY packages for this reason.
Its a well known problem - those of us that don't use rpm based distro's call it 'rpm hell' - there are a couple of projects that are trying to fix this, one is 'apt-rpm' and the other is mandrakes 'urpmi'.
I use 9.1; I didn't proceed with installing "apt" after I got the message about the bad signature. So I never got to "synaptic" either.
I guess I'm easily intimidated largely due to my novice status, but I can't afford to jeopardize my system (well, actually I CAN, there's nobody on it but me--but I've been so near to throwing the thing in the trash due to all the problems I've had...)--so I am tending these days to err way on the side of caution.
I don't remember for sure if I went ahead installing, having seen the warning message. What is your system? HDs, setup, OSs, etc.
If it fails, if nothing else, you can reinstall MDK9.1, just don't reformat your /home partition. I think I have done that 3-4 times, until I learned some things. Again, I am still newbie. In all this, I have not screwed up the system,mainly because I was installing Linux ona spare drive, leaving XP on the main. Now, I have left XP behind, and have MDK on the main drive, and I'm trying to build LFS on the spare.
NOt once did I screw up the system so bad that I couldn't boot
I've had much the same experience--reinstalling Linux has been much less painful than reinstalling M$ Window$. I have left MS absolutely and definitely behind me, will not have anything more to do with any of their products; if MS succeeds in world domination as planned, I will simply not use computers any more. I can be VERY stubborn.
Good luck with LFS. I read about it a little. Maybe someday. Not today!
jonr, your probly right. i do often install rpm's made for other distro's that the one i run. it work's fine some of the time, but i've often wondered why there were rpms for different distros, and what the differences is. so i'll keep that in mind when i have problems.
speedracer05, i have tried to install stuff using source code before. i still have a few problem's. one i have run into is that i have no clue how to tell the system that i have installed this software (especially for libraries) so once its on there, i still get yelled at for not having it installed. another is that sometimes installing from source is very very time consuming do to all of the configuring options and telling the code where other libraries it needs are, among other things. i dont want to devote my life to setting up my desktop pc.
chem1, that looks interesting, i'll haveto try that thing out. thanks.
no i just didnt want ignorant people posting dumb suggestions about stuff they don't know about. i just wanted to make sure that people knew, before they started reading, that i was not asking for a simple answer.