LinuxQuestions.org
Did you know LQ has a Linux Hardware Compatibility List?
Go Back   LinuxQuestions.org > Forums > Linux Forums > Linux - Software
User Name
Password
Linux - Software This forum is for Software issues.
Having a problem installing a new program? Want to know which application is best for the job? Post your question in this forum.

Notices

Reply
 
Search this Thread
Old 01-14-2004, 10:28 PM   #1
brentos
Member
 
Registered: Nov 2003
Distribution: Fedora Core3, RHEL3,4
Posts: 92

Rep: Reputation: 15
RedHat 9 End of life


I was just wondering what everyone thought about RedHat bring all of its official free versions of Linux to an end.

I know they still have the Fudora Project but that is not really supported and its not completely stable so not suitable for some servers such as a web server.

So I find myself in an odd position, I have a RedHat 9 and a RedHat 7.3 server hosted remotely so I can not really change the Distro myself and I am stuck with two machines that will not have simple updates available.

So just wanted to hear what others had to say on the issue.
 
Old 01-14-2004, 11:27 PM   #2
lupin_the_3rd
Member
 
Registered: Oct 2003
Location: Memphis, TN
Distribution: Slackware current
Posts: 485

Rep: Reputation: 30
If you're running a server I would use debian woody (probably comparable to your 7.3 in terms of package versions and maintained with security updates on a regular basis) or slackware (simple and stable). Fedora is buggy but not any more so than RH9 IMHO. I would actually say that Fedora is more supported than RH9 considering it has a community maintaining and building packages including third party multimedia apps.
 
Old 01-15-2004, 06:22 AM   #3
ac1980
Member
 
Registered: Aug 2003
Location: Trento, Italy
Distribution: Debian testing
Posts: 394

Rep: Reputation: 30
RH choice is clear: if you have a mid to large company, and you want a stable and supported OS, you can pay them well for RHEL. They're going to use some of this cash to help developing free Fedora, in order to include its code in future versions. They're basically giving up earning in home market to concentrate on enterprises, IMHO that's a sort of silent agreement with MDK.
This is a questionable policy, but as a matter of fact we're not in charge of this choice. Moreover, showing there's good earning in free software, too, is not a bad thing in itself.
So what can you do? Either trust Fedora, switch to Debian, buy RHEL or install rpm upgrades by hand.
 
Old 01-15-2004, 07:32 AM   #4
dishawjp
Member
 
Registered: Dec 2003
Location: Central New York
Distribution: RH/Fedora/SUSE
Posts: 64

Rep: Reputation: 15
I was a bit concerned when I first heard of this.... about 5 or 6 months ago. But I'm running Fedora Core 1 (as well as several other, older RH installs going back to RH 6.1) and I'm really happy with FC1. Avaliable updaters include apt, yum, current and up2date. The community support, both on the Fedora list

http://fedora.redhat.com/participate/communicate

and forums such as this one is excellent.

For your server, you may want to consider one of the RHEL products, especially if you consider it to be "mission critical" but if you've been using RHL products in the past without purchasing support, give Fedora a look. I don't see that it's any buggier than the previous RHL releases.

One other possibility would be to take a look at the Fedora Legacy project (google it, it's out there). They are working at providing extended support (errata and etc.) for EOL'd RHL/FC releases.

HTH

Jim Dishaw
 
Old 01-15-2004, 10:02 AM   #5
brentos
Member
 
Registered: Nov 2003
Distribution: Fedora Core3, RHEL3,4
Posts: 92

Original Poster
Rep: Reputation: 15
I do not consider the server to be mission critical since it is just used as a webhost and some various other webbased features. But when it is down we do lose in terms of visitors since they no longer think our site is stable and also we lose the money from the ads that go to pay for the site.

The only thing that I am worried about is that I can not really upgrade the machines to any other OS (RedHat or other Distro) since I do not have physical access to the machine. As of yet the server hosting company has not offered a change in OS and I am sure when they do there will be a fee associated with it.

So for the time being when RedHat 9 comes to its End of Life I will be forced to stick with it and manually upgrade anything that needs to be, which will make my life harder.

Last edited by brentos; 01-15-2004 at 10:03 AM.
 
  


Reply


Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Redhat: End of life DriveMeCrazy Red Hat 3 06-22-2004 02:26 PM
Reminder: Upcoming "End of Life" Dates for Redhat Products Capt_Caveman Linux - Security 26 06-07-2004 02:16 PM
end of life of Redhat 9 melinda_sayang Linux - Security 1 04-01-2004 02:31 AM
RedHat "end of life" Question thetwin Linux - Security 5 12-31-2003 03:22 PM
End of Life - What does it mean for me? jamesrh Red Hat 1 12-12-2003 10:44 AM


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 11:43 AM.

Main Menu
Advertisement
My LQ
Write for LQ
LinuxQuestions.org is looking for people interested in writing Editorials, Articles, Reviews, and more. If you'd like to contribute content, let us know.
Main Menu
Syndicate
RSS1  Latest Threads
RSS1  LQ News
Twitter: @linuxquestions
identi.ca: @linuxquestions
Facebook: linuxquestions Google+: linuxquestions
Open Source Consulting | Domain Registration