Linux - SoftwareThis forum is for Software issues.
Having a problem installing a new program? Want to know which application is best for the job? Post your question in this forum.
Welcome to LinuxQuestions.org, a friendly and active Linux Community.
You are currently viewing LQ as a guest. By joining our community you will have the ability to post topics, receive our newsletter, use the advanced search, subscribe to threads and access many other special features. Registration is quick, simple and absolutely free. Join our community today!
Note that registered members see fewer ads, and ContentLink is completely disabled once you log in.
If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us. If you need to reset your password, click here.
Having a problem logging in? Please visit this page to clear all LQ-related cookies.
Introduction to Linux - A Hands on Guide
This guide was created as an overview of the Linux Operating System, geared toward new users as an exploration tour and getting started guide, with exercises at the end of each chapter.
For more advanced trainees it can be a desktop reference, and a collection of the base knowledge needed to proceed with system and network administration. This book contains many real life examples derived from the author's experience as a Linux system and network administrator, trainer and consultant. They hope these examples will help you to get a better understanding of the Linux system and that you feel encouraged to try out things on your own.
Click Here to receive this Complete Guide absolutely free.
(I am wanting to install the emuk101 driver for a SB PCI512.)
I need to direct the installation file to the kernel, editing a file in the driver from usr/src/linux 2.4, the default, to usr/src/linux xxx, whatever my version is. red hat doesn't have that..it has usr/src/redhat, which appears empty...where is the equivalent to usr/src/linux in redhat? I have posted this question at the forum on the driver page, but there has been no response.
well, if you go by the way redhat would generally rather you did.. i.e. only used RPM's you'd not have need for the kernel source, and at over 100mb decompressed, it's not the sort of thing yuod want to install unless you needed it.
Really? So without it I could make changes, add stuff, via rpms, not needing usr/src/linux...? I need it for recompiling if I so deign, yes? What does the OS run from, then? Apparently I have a vagrant understanding.
well, that's the source, not the compiled program. all that source (169mb on the newst kernel) is compiled down to a 1mb kernel file anad say, 5 mb of aditional modules. feel free to read it, it's not very interesting tho... the kernel source is only needed really when you want to compile the kernel, and i'm not really sure what your'e doing with it. generally mosy programs only ever need access to the kernel headers, which list what finctions can be called in the kernel, rather than the actual code itself.
rpm's and such like compiled pre-compiled and only need to be put in place to work.