Linux - SoftwareThis forum is for Software issues.
Having a problem installing a new program? Want to know which application is best for the job? Post your question in this forum.
Notices
Welcome to LinuxQuestions.org, a friendly and active Linux Community.
You are currently viewing LQ as a guest. By joining our community you will have the ability to post topics, receive our newsletter, use the advanced search, subscribe to threads and access many other special features. Registration is quick, simple and absolutely free. Join our community today!
Note that registered members see fewer ads, and ContentLink is completely disabled once you log in.
If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us. If you need to reset your password, click here.
Having a problem logging in? Please visit this page to clear all LQ-related cookies.
Get a virtual cloud desktop with the Linux distro that you want in less than five minutes with Shells! With over 10 pre-installed distros to choose from, the worry-free installation life is here! Whether you are a digital nomad or just looking for flexibility, Shells can put your Linux machine on the device that you want to use.
Exclusive for LQ members, get up to 45% off per month. Click here for more info.
Hi team,I just encounter a problem of DHCP.Here is the question:
I have a DHCP server in the env,and I set a subnet which contain 200 IPs in the DHCP configure file.The lease time is 1 hour.There are 180 vms using the dhcp server.By some mistakes,the DHCP server is down and out of service with two hours,so the vms can not renew the lease .At this moment ,the DHCP has been recoverd,what confuse me is that if I create 10 new vms in this DHCP env,whether these new VMS will occupy those IPS which have been assigned to those previous 180 VMS or the new vm will be assigned a new IP of the rest of twenty.
Any help is appreciate.
I believe this is technically at the discrepancy of the server itself, and different servers might take a different approach. However, in my experience as the DHCP server knows that there is a lease out for a given address it will not give it out again if it can find another address.
The more I think about it, the less sense it makes to reallocate it. A client that is still online will not constantly confirm it still wants the lease. I think RFC on that says that will renew the lease halfway through the lease duration. So outside of that, there'll be no communication between the original client and the server, so might as well not be there...
LinuxQuestions.org is looking for people interested in writing
Editorials, Articles, Reviews, and more. If you'd like to contribute
content, let us know.