Linux - SoftwareThis forum is for Software issues.
Having a problem installing a new program? Want to know which application is best for the job? Post your question in this forum.
Notices
Welcome to LinuxQuestions.org, a friendly and active Linux Community.
You are currently viewing LQ as a guest. By joining our community you will have the ability to post topics, receive our newsletter, use the advanced search, subscribe to threads and access many other special features. Registration is quick, simple and absolutely free. Join our community today!
Note that registered members see fewer ads, and ContentLink is completely disabled once you log in.
If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us. If you need to reset your password, click here.
Having a problem logging in? Please visit this page to clear all LQ-related cookies.
Get a virtual cloud desktop with the Linux distro that you want in less than five minutes with Shells! With over 10 pre-installed distros to choose from, the worry-free installation life is here! Whether you are a digital nomad or just looking for flexibility, Shells can put your Linux machine on the device that you want to use.
Exclusive for LQ members, get up to 45% off per month. Click here for more info.
A newbie friend of mine has a higher end pentium II (for which I'll be stongly advising him to add lots of ram), and would like me to install linux on it for home desktop use, ie, amsn, firefox, xmms etc.
My question is this:
He knows very little about computers, and since KDE is not an option, what window manager setup would provide him with the highest speed and reliability while maintaining ease of use? What other things should I consider when installing the system, and would it be better to choose a flavour of BSD instead?
edit to add:: and which filesystem would be best?
-thanks
Last edited by flamesrock; 08-24-2004 at 02:29 AM.
I'm partial to Fluxbox as a lightweight WM. Be sure all of the software you add for him is in the Fluxbox menu. I've run KDE 3.1.4 on a PII 400 MHz with 192 MB of RAM. It's not fast, but it's usable, so maybe KDE isn't toally out of the question. Filesystem type doesn't really matter on a desktop IMO, just so long as you get something journaled (EXT3 or ReiserFS).
Please provide more details about the machine -- how much RAM is available, what kind of video card does it have, what's the clock speed, how much disk space is available, etc. I'll agree with btmiller, and wouldn't write off KDE so fast, although it should be understood that it's unlikely that you will see blazing performance.
As for the file system, I would recommend either ext3 or reiserfs. -- J.W.
It turns out the computer is a 400mhz processor with 64megs of ram (he'll be adding 256 for 320megs) and amazingly, it can run windows XP so it looks like we'll go with KDE after all-minimal eye candy. The hard drive seems to be in good condition at 20gigs, while I'm not sure what kind of graphics card he has, I know its not going to be able to run Doom III and not likely anything 3d accelerated.
Depends on the cpu type and what video you put in it... With a P2-400 and a tnt2 you could run ut original or even Q3 maybe... certainly some of the older 3D stuff like early quakes 1 and 2... and legacy doom.
I installed COBIND on my old laptop (PII, 450mhz w/ 10G HD).....
Cobind rocks for newbies not looking to learn linux at first. It's all about less is more -- it has everything you need ONCE and nothing else (i.e. only one Word Suite, only one Music Player, only one etc etc) and it all works out of the box.
It's based on Fedora Core and I think they've done a very good job (it even has a GUI software manager).
LinuxQuestions.org is looking for people interested in writing
Editorials, Articles, Reviews, and more. If you'd like to contribute
content, let us know.