nautilus or thunar freeze when nfs mount not available
Linux - SoftwareThis forum is for Software issues.
Having a problem installing a new program? Want to know which application is best for the job? Post your question in this forum.
Welcome to LinuxQuestions.org, a friendly and active Linux Community.
You are currently viewing LQ as a guest. By joining our community you will have the ability to post topics, receive our newsletter, use the advanced search, subscribe to threads and access many other special features. Registration is quick, simple and absolutely free. Join our community today!
Note that registered members see fewer ads, and ContentLink is completely disabled once you log in.
If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us. If you need to reset your password, click here.
Having a problem logging in? Please visit this page to clear all LQ-related cookies.
Introduction to Linux - A Hands on Guide
This guide was created as an overview of the Linux Operating System, geared toward new users as an exploration tour and getting started guide, with exercises at the end of each chapter.
For more advanced trainees it can be a desktop reference, and a collection of the base knowledge needed to proceed with system and network administration. This book contains many real life examples derived from the author's experience as a Linux system and network administrator, trainer and consultant. They hope these examples will help you to get a better understanding of the Linux system and that you feel encouraged to try out things on your own.
Click Here to receive this Complete Guide absolutely free.
David1357, that can cause some problems in unreliable connections. Note that unmounting an NFS volume can hang for a long time (minutes) if the volume is not reachable. In my experience, these problems arise even if you mount it with async,soft,intr.
nephish, this is a known problem with NFS. I would also be interested in an alternative. Seeing how linux has a network architecture tightly tied into its roots it's hard to believe that NFS is such an horrid thing. Personally I use it only when strictly necessary. Most times I preffer sshfs over it, but some times it's not suitable for the task.
ps. Everything I said here is applicable to v3. I never tried NFS v4.
well, i had wanted to use nfs and the prior suggestion, just not doing it every second, maybe 1/minute. And yeah, it is because of the somewhat flakyness.
I have been using samba, which i like bacause my mac can see it, but still would much rather use something that should be very ingrained into the linux world. I am wanting to write a pet project program that involves an almost virtual, psudo filesystem using existing technologies.
Thanks for the tips, and yes, if i find a better answer, i will post it here.
I have been using samba, which i like because my mac can see it, but still would much rather use something that should be very ingrained into the linux world.
If it is any consolation, I think most people end up using samba because it can be accessed by non-Linux operating systems. I have been using samba to share files on Linux machines since 2002 and I have never had any problems.