LinuxQuestions.org
Share your knowledge at the LQ Wiki.
Home Forums Tutorials Articles Register
Go Back   LinuxQuestions.org > Forums > Linux Forums > Linux - Software
User Name
Password
Linux - Software This forum is for Software issues.
Having a problem installing a new program? Want to know which application is best for the job? Post your question in this forum.

Notices


Reply
  Search this Thread
Old 09-21-2004, 10:25 AM   #1
scng
Member
 
Registered: Sep 2004
Location: Hong Kong
Distribution: Fedora Core 3
Posts: 53

Rep: Reputation: 15
mplayer problem


what's missing?
I've just installed mplayer 0.92 but......... i am using FC2

Code:
[root@localhost cdrom]# ls mplayer-*.rpm
mplayer-codecs-extralite-1.0-1.i386.rpm  mplayer-gui-0.92-1.i386.rpm
mplayer-common-0.92-1.i386.rpm           mplayer-skin-default-1.0-2.noarch.rpm
[root@localhost cdrom]# rpm -i mplayer-*
warning: only V3 signatures can be verified, skipping V4 signature
warning: mplayer-common-0.92-1.i386.rpm: V3 DSA signature: NOKEY, key ID 28a26067
warning: only V3 signatures can be verified, skipping V4 signature
error: Failed dependencies:
        mplayer-common = 0.92 is needed by mplayer-gui-0.92-1
I've got these 4 rpm successfully installed on another FC2 box and successfully played movies, however not for this time.

BTW, i tried to apt-get install mplayer, but once i start mplayer and play movies, it halts and terminates.......

thnx
 
Old 09-21-2004, 10:54 AM   #2
mikedeatworld
Member
 
Registered: Nov 2003
Location: Farmington Michigan
Distribution: UBUNTU - Slackware - SuSE 9.1 - Knoppix - Fedora
Posts: 828

Rep: Reputation: 30
you may want to install these packages in an order so that it finds the dependencies...

rpm -iv in this order:

mplayer-common-0.92-1.i386.rpm
mplayer-gui-0.92-1.i386.rpm
mplayer-skin-default-1.0-2.noarch.rpm
mplayer-codecs-extralite-1.0-1.i386.rpm

or check out their site to get the exact method they recommend.
 
Old 09-21-2004, 11:46 AM   #3
eqxro
Member
 
Registered: Apr 2004
Location: Outer space :D
Distribution: Gentoo 2005.0 amd64 2.6.14-dfx3
Posts: 203

Rep: Reputation: 30
I've seen cases where a cyclic dependency wouldn't allow to install the packages one at a time...

rpm -ivh mplayer-common-0.92-1.i386.rpm mplayer-gui-0.92-1.i386.rpm mplayer-skin-default-1.0-2.noarch.rpm mplayer-codecs-extralite-1.0-1.i386.rpm

(they're all in a single command line)
 
Old 09-21-2004, 11:51 AM   #4
scng
Member
 
Registered: Sep 2004
Location: Hong Kong
Distribution: Fedora Core 3
Posts: 53

Original Poster
Rep: Reputation: 15
i've tried and the result is as follows:

Code:
[root@localhost cdrom]# rpm -ivh mplayer-common-0.92-1.i386.rpm mplayer-gui-0.92-1.i386.rpm mplayer-skin-default-1.0-2.noarch.rpm mplayer-codecs-extralite-1.0-1.i386.rpm
warning: mplayer-common-0.92-1.i386.rpm: V3 DSA signature: NOKEY, key ID 28a26067
warning: only V3 signatures can be verified, skipping V4 signature
warning: only V3 signatures can be verified, skipping V4 signature
error: Failed dependencies:
        mplayer-common = 0.92 is needed by mplayer-gui-0.92-1
 
Old 09-21-2004, 11:56 AM   #5
mikedeatworld
Member
 
Registered: Nov 2003
Location: Farmington Michigan
Distribution: UBUNTU - Slackware - SuSE 9.1 - Knoppix - Fedora
Posts: 828

Rep: Reputation: 30
not sure where you got your packages, but have you tried going to

http://www.mplayerhq.hu/homepage/design7/dload.html


and grabing the packages they provide and installing from source?

here's the link to their doc's:

http://www.mplayerhq.hu/DOCS/HTML/en/index.html

also, im not sure if you are partial to mplayer but xine is a great option as well.

 
Old 09-21-2004, 03:56 PM   #6
eqxro
Member
 
Registered: Apr 2004
Location: Outer space :D
Distribution: Gentoo 2005.0 amd64 2.6.14-dfx3
Posts: 203

Rep: Reputation: 30
Have you tried installing mplayer-common in the first place by itself? It is pretty odd you're getting this message, because it should've worked in the first place.
 
Old 09-21-2004, 04:38 PM   #7
LoungeLizard
Member
 
Registered: Apr 2003
Location: Tampa, Florida
Distribution: Mint 17.2 ,OpenSuse, Kali and Pepermint OS 6
Posts: 276

Rep: Reputation: 30
Quote:
Originally posted by eqxro
Have you tried installing mplayer-common in the first place by itself? It is pretty odd you're getting this message, because it should've worked in the first place.
Thats exactly what I had to do to get it to work...I just installed common by itself then installed the others and it worked fine
 
Old 09-21-2004, 07:11 PM   #8
mikedeatworld
Member
 
Registered: Nov 2003
Location: Farmington Michigan
Distribution: UBUNTU - Slackware - SuSE 9.1 - Knoppix - Fedora
Posts: 828

Rep: Reputation: 30
thats what i was getting at in my original post...
 
Old 09-21-2004, 08:37 PM   #9
scng
Member
 
Registered: Sep 2004
Location: Hong Kong
Distribution: Fedora Core 3
Posts: 53

Original Poster
Rep: Reputation: 15
um, i tried to installed mplayer-common alone and at the first place:

rpm -ivh mplayer-common-0.92-1.i386.rpm

very surprising and mysterious, it said:

error: Failed dependencies:
mplayer-common = 0.92 is needed by mplayer-common-0.92-1



a contradicting result!
 
  


Reply



Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off



Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
mplayer problem saipraveen Linux - Newbie 10 06-13-2005 11:56 PM
yet another MPlayer problem raffi Slackware 5 01-13-2005 03:19 PM
mplayer problem cool_ashwin22 Fedora 0 10-20-2004 09:50 AM
Mplayer Problem. Itsu Linux - Software 5 02-02-2004 09:27 PM
MPlayer Problem #1 Micro420 Linux - Software 9 09-12-2003 04:54 PM

LinuxQuestions.org > Forums > Linux Forums > Linux - Software

All times are GMT -5. The time now is 11:51 AM.

Main Menu
Advertisement
My LQ
Write for LQ
LinuxQuestions.org is looking for people interested in writing Editorials, Articles, Reviews, and more. If you'd like to contribute content, let us know.
Main Menu
Syndicate
RSS1  Latest Threads
RSS1  LQ News
Twitter: @linuxquestions
Open Source Consulting | Domain Registration