LinuxQuestions.org
LinuxAnswers - the LQ Linux tutorial section.
Go Back   LinuxQuestions.org > Forums > Linux Forums > Linux - Software
User Name
Password
Linux - Software This forum is for Software issues.
Having a problem installing a new program? Want to know which application is best for the job? Post your question in this forum.

Notices

Reply
 
Search this Thread
Old 02-18-2013, 11:08 PM   #1
jhwilliams
Senior Member
 
Registered: Apr 2007
Location: Portland, OR
Distribution: Debian, Android, LFS
Posts: 1,168

Rep: Reputation: 207Reputation: 207Reputation: 207
Most Stable Linux Release Ever?


What do you think is the most stable Linux distro / release version you've experienced?

Ubuntu and Fedora are out because they change all the time and are an absolute shit show, imho. (I use and love both.)

Debian Etch is a contender imho. The quality of System Integration from the Debian developers is amazing. If you can live in a world several years old, it's hard to beat.

I wonder if there are projects that take Debian Stable and refine it even further, creating uber stable works of Art and Science that just basically have no bugs? Of course, having release bugs and keeping them is part of "stability" as workarounds come to be known and used, even pushed to package management.

Sorry to start another "which distro?" style thread, but hopefully the focus is reasonably narrow.

Last edited by jhwilliams; 02-18-2013 at 11:14 PM.
 
Old 02-19-2013, 12:37 AM   #2
chrism01
Guru
 
Registered: Aug 2004
Location: Sydney
Distribution: Centos 6.5, Centos 5.10
Posts: 16,261

Rep: Reputation: 2028Reputation: 2028Reputation: 2028Reputation: 2028Reputation: 2028Reputation: 2028Reputation: 2028Reputation: 2028Reputation: 2028Reputation: 2028Reputation: 2028
It depends on your exact definition, but I'd say RHEL has got to be a contender.
 
Old 02-19-2013, 02:28 AM   #3
jhwilliams
Senior Member
 
Registered: Apr 2007
Location: Portland, OR
Distribution: Debian, Android, LFS
Posts: 1,168

Original Poster
Rep: Reputation: 207Reputation: 207Reputation: 207
+1; the RHEL / CentOS installs I worked with ~6 years back were really reliable. Is there a specific version you felt was most reliable? Hard to abstract away newly well supported hardware in kernel versions, and other major package revisions, I know.
 
Old 02-19-2013, 02:37 AM   #4
JESSEJJ89
Member
 
Registered: Dec 2011
Location: North America
Distribution: Gentoo
Posts: 50

Rep: Reputation: 5
Debian for desktops

RHEL for servers

CentOS is a great alternative for both.

Keep in mind it takes a "stable" user to keep any distro stable. I've had my gentoo system installed since 2009, and have't had a single breakage.

Last edited by JESSEJJ89; 02-19-2013 at 02:40 AM.
 
Old 02-19-2013, 05:02 AM   #5
qlue
Member
 
Registered: Aug 2009
Location: Umzinto, South Africa
Distribution: Crunchbang
Posts: 605
Blog Entries: 1

Rep: Reputation: 139Reputation: 139
Well, as usual it's the use-case that defines the answer here. For my own personal use I've found Crunchbang#! to be the best and most stable for me!
Of, course, Crunchbang#! is simply a slimmed down version of Debian. So if you need something with a little more meat, then Debian would be the better choice.
 
Old 02-19-2013, 05:38 AM   #6
TobiSGD
Moderator
 
Registered: Dec 2009
Location: Hanover, Germany
Distribution: Main: Gentoo Others: What fits the task
Posts: 15,560
Blog Entries: 2

Rep: Reputation: 4035Reputation: 4035Reputation: 4035Reputation: 4035Reputation: 4035Reputation: 4035Reputation: 4035Reputation: 4035Reputation: 4035Reputation: 4035Reputation: 4035
You will never get a distro without bugs and using old distributions (that are not supported anymore) is far from being recommended, simply because nop one fixes bugs and security holes in them. If you want something very stable go for Debian, RHEL (or one of its clones) or Slackware.
If you don't restrict yourself to Linux look at one of the BSDs, also.

Last edited by TobiSGD; 02-19-2013 at 05:40 AM.
 
Old 02-19-2013, 03:00 PM   #7
jefro
Guru
 
Registered: Mar 2008
Posts: 11,368

Rep: Reputation: 1395Reputation: 1395Reputation: 1395Reputation: 1395Reputation: 1395Reputation: 1395Reputation: 1395Reputation: 1395Reputation: 1395Reputation: 1395
Both hardware and software need to be fully tested. Big name companies test some or a few versions of linux on their enterprise level systems. My choices would be some system that is sold pre-loaded with an OS. Just because a computer boots doesn't mean it is stable. Just because a computer runs windows doesn't mean it can run linux.

As above, the BSD's tend to be good choices for reasons. One is they are conservative usually in many of the inner settings.


Conservative settings in linux and things like ECC ram and even bios settings may be keys to a more stable system. If you buy cheap junk hardware that was never tested then you can expect it to fail.
 
Old 02-19-2013, 03:42 PM   #8
John VV
Guru
 
Registered: Aug 2005
Posts: 12,833

Rep: Reputation: 1709Reputation: 1709Reputation: 1709Reputation: 1709Reputation: 1709Reputation: 1709Reputation: 1709Reputation: 1709Reputation: 1709Reputation: 1709Reputation: 1709
personal experience
RHEL/CentOS/ScientificLinux

i have only had 1 ( one) crash in 5 years and that was 100% MY FAULT

besides using SL6.3 i also consider it an EMERGENCY back up

if OpenSUSE dies i KNOW that SL6.3 will work
 
Old 02-19-2013, 05:19 PM   #9
jhwilliams
Senior Member
 
Registered: Apr 2007
Location: Portland, OR
Distribution: Debian, Android, LFS
Posts: 1,168

Original Poster
Rep: Reputation: 207Reputation: 207Reputation: 207
A lot of votes for RHEL/CentOS. While not the only answer, seems to be a clear winner from the responses.
 
Old 02-19-2013, 06:49 PM   #10
chrism01
Guru
 
Registered: Aug 2004
Location: Sydney
Distribution: Centos 6.5, Centos 5.10
Posts: 16,261

Rep: Reputation: 2028Reputation: 2028Reputation: 2028Reputation: 2028Reputation: 2028Reputation: 2028Reputation: 2028Reputation: 2028Reputation: 2028Reputation: 2028Reputation: 2028
Look at it this way RHEL (& clones) are the most widely used in commerce ... there's a reason for that
As above, they are usually run on HW that has been tested by the manufacturer to be stable with that distro.
 
  


Reply


Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
LXer: Downoad Linux Kernel 3.1.4 Stable Release LXer Syndicated Linux News 0 11-30-2011 09:20 AM
stable Linux Kernel Release liova Linux - Software 2 01-30-2011 01:55 PM
LXer: Sabayon Linux 5.4 GNOME and KDE: Stable release LXer Syndicated Linux News 0 10-01-2010 11:50 AM
Download Linux XP/Trustverse Stable Release .iso biggles1000 Linux - Distributions 4 11-20-2009 02:39 AM
LXer: Linux: 2.6.15-rc6, Stable Release Before New Year LXer Syndicated Linux News 0 12-19-2005 02:46 PM


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 11:58 AM.

Main Menu
My LQ
Write for LQ
LinuxQuestions.org is looking for people interested in writing Editorials, Articles, Reviews, and more. If you'd like to contribute content, let us know.
Main Menu
Syndicate
RSS1  Latest Threads
RSS1  LQ News
Twitter: @linuxquestions
identi.ca: @linuxquestions
Facebook: linuxquestions Google+: linuxquestions
Open Source Consulting | Domain Registration