Missing symbols in equations of .doc documents opened with OOo in FC4
Linux - SoftwareThis forum is for Software issues.
Having a problem installing a new program? Want to know which application is best for the job? Post your question in this forum.
Notices
Welcome to LinuxQuestions.org, a friendly and active Linux Community.
You are currently viewing LQ as a guest. By joining our community you will have the ability to post topics, receive our newsletter, use the advanced search, subscribe to threads and access many other special features. Registration is quick, simple and absolutely free. Join our community today!
Note that registered members see fewer ads, and ContentLink is completely disabled once you log in.
If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us. If you need to reset your password, click here.
Having a problem logging in? Please visit this page to clear all LQ-related cookies.
Get a virtual cloud desktop with the Linux distro that you want in less than five minutes with Shells! With over 10 pre-installed distros to choose from, the worry-free installation life is here! Whether you are a digital nomad or just looking for flexibility, Shells can put your Linux machine on the device that you want to use.
Exclusive for LQ members, get up to 45% off per month. Click here for more info.
Missing symbols in equations of .doc documents opened with OOo in FC4
I have a problem when I open Word documents with mathematical equiations from the university. Some symbols as sums, infinty, brackest, matrixes are missing. The problem occurs in my FC4 instalation and only with .doc files. I opened these files in other distribution without incoveniences. I have installed almost any existing font for xorg, gtk o Gnome but nothing happened.
Somebody have any idea of wht to do?
Yes, I do. And I can edit equations with OOo Math and Latex without problems.
I think that the problem is more related somehow as how the equations from Word are rendered by OOo.
But, how knows? There also symbols and/ or formats, as integrals, that I get fine at the documents. The problem persists even if I export to ther formats as .odt or pdf.
J
Distribution: RHEL/CentOS/SL 5 i386 and x86_64 pata for IDE in use
Posts: 4,790
Rep:
OK, was just making sure.........
Now which OOo are we talking about, the one supplied by Fedora or OOo???
Yes it does make a difference also by how (and which font version) the equations are embedded in the Word document. Some versions of Word are harder to import/export correctly then others which is always a problem with undocumented proprietary formats.
This is why propriety formats like Word suck. I realize that you probably don't have the time to convert all your documents to Latex, but you should consider just using Latex. Word has nothing on Latex (except giving you problems like these). Unfortunately, I don't have the solution to your current problem, but if you just avoid Word (or even OpenOffice, if you're doing equations), these sorts of problems wouldn't crop up in the first place.
I agree with you. I usually use OOo Math to edith equtions, but say that to the guy who writes down the exercises and notes of the comples variable course.
J
Distribution: RHEL/CentOS/SL 5 i386 and x86_64 pata for IDE in use
Posts: 4,790
Rep:
Well you could try OOo-2.0.3 from OpenOffice.org (filters are somewhat better) but Krelian has the best idea.
Some have found importing word docs into OOo for Windows then saving as odt/pdf a workaround solution (I cannot say for sure never tried it), maybe use wine/crossover for this.
I used to open these files with the Ubuntu live cd or Knoppix( OOo 1.9b!) and save them as .pdf. But,it is supossed to be an unnescessary work. It will be a good integartion with the Gnome desktop if I´ll install OOo from OpenOffice.rog?
J
LinuxQuestions.org is looking for people interested in writing
Editorials, Articles, Reviews, and more. If you'd like to contribute
content, let us know.