LinuxQuestions.org
Visit Jeremy's Blog.
Go Back   LinuxQuestions.org > Forums > Linux Forums > Linux - Software
User Name
Password
Linux - Software This forum is for Software issues.
Having a problem installing a new program? Want to know which application is best for the job? Post your question in this forum.

Notices


Reply
  Search this Thread
Old 03-16-2003, 06:08 AM   #1
futurist
Member
 
Registered: Mar 2002
Location: malaysia
Distribution: Mandriva 2006 RC1
Posts: 486

Rep: Reputation: 30
Lightbulb Mandrake 9.0 and Redhat 8.0 on Same HDD ?


Hi guys, just want to ask can I install redhat and mandrake on the same HDD ?
 
Old 03-16-2003, 06:22 AM   #2
acid_kewpie
Moderator
 
Registered: Jun 2001
Location: UK
Distribution: Gentoo, RHEL, Fedora, Centos
Posts: 43,417

Rep: Reputation: 1974Reputation: 1974Reputation: 1974Reputation: 1974Reputation: 1974Reputation: 1974Reputation: 1974Reputation: 1974Reputation: 1974Reputation: 1974Reputation: 1974
back again? you going to play nicely this time? good...

it should be pretty trivial to install both, as long as you leave enough space unsued on the drive for the second distro then when you install the second distro the installer should pick up the other one no problem, and set up the boot loader for both. last time i compared them the mandrake installer was cleverer than redhat's so i'd recommend installing mandrake second. you should also be fine to use a common /home partition as well.
 
Old 03-16-2003, 08:31 AM   #3
futurist
Member
 
Registered: Mar 2002
Location: malaysia
Distribution: Mandriva 2006 RC1
Posts: 486

Original Poster
Rep: Reputation: 30
I love linux now.
I bought a 60 GB hdd, installed first with Windows ME, then linux mandrake 9.0.
And now my HDD still got 7 GB unused, I plan to install REDhat 8.0, any problem ?
 
Old 03-16-2003, 12:00 PM   #4
futurist
Member
 
Registered: Mar 2002
Location: malaysia
Distribution: Mandriva 2006 RC1
Posts: 486

Original Poster
Rep: Reputation: 30
redhat wipe off my mandrake, the lilo can not boot.
i installed redhat on free space, mandrake resides on another space, however, redhat format the swap file of mandrake, and all things gone!
 
Old 03-16-2003, 12:05 PM   #5
MasterC
LQ Guru
 
Registered: Mar 2002
Location: Salt Lake City, UT - USA
Distribution: Gentoo ; LFS ; Kubuntu
Posts: 12,612

Rep: Reputation: 64
that sucks. rh should have been installed first, then mandy. rh wouldn't have installed it's own bootloader unless you told it too, which overwrote grub into the mbr. this time around, install mandy last.

Cool
 
Old 03-16-2003, 06:44 PM   #6
ArsAnima
LQ Newbie
 
Registered: Mar 2003
Posts: 4

Rep: Reputation: 0
Good thing to do is to install boot managers (lilo or grub) on its linux partitions and another one in mbr (old "boot magic" versions could be found price-free). You can then install any new system with its own boot loader config, and manually add it to mbr boot man in less then 30 s.
Single swap partition is enough.
I have Win(95,XP) ; (RedHat, Caldera, Debian)GNU/Linux & GNU/HURD. Works fine.
 
Old 03-16-2003, 09:03 PM   #7
futurist
Member
 
Registered: Mar 2002
Location: malaysia
Distribution: Mandriva 2006 RC1
Posts: 486

Original Poster
Rep: Reputation: 30
the bootloader of mandy is LILO,
so, for redhat, i shall choose LILO or Grub ?
 
Old 03-16-2003, 09:14 PM   #8
jdc2048
Member
 
Registered: Jul 2002
Location: Ohio, USA
Distribution: Redhat, Gentoo, Solaris, HP-UX, etc...
Posts: 391

Rep: Reputation: 30
you could choose neither bootloader for the RedHat part, or install it onto the RedHat partition (i.e. /dev/hda3 if that is your RedHat partition). I have had success with installing 2 versions of RedHat sharing the same swap partition. It was not complicated at all. You did mean swap partition and not swap file right?

You may want to post your hd layout, that would help out.

i.e.
/dev/hda1 = <OS> = <#>GB = <partition type 82, 83, etc..>
/dev/hda2 = ???
/dev/hda3 = ???
/dev/hda4 = ???
...
...
 
Old 03-16-2003, 09:49 PM   #9
futurist
Member
 
Registered: Mar 2002
Location: malaysia
Distribution: Mandriva 2006 RC1
Posts: 486

Original Poster
Rep: Reputation: 30
how about if i choose to create boot disk?
will it make my mbr intact ?
 
Old 03-16-2003, 10:02 PM   #10
jdc2048
Member
 
Registered: Jul 2002
Location: Ohio, USA
Distribution: Redhat, Gentoo, Solaris, HP-UX, etc...
Posts: 391

Rep: Reputation: 30
creating a boot disk will only create a floppy (3 1/2") disk that can boot the O/S from which it was created. This is a good deal when you have a PC that is shared by technical (Linux-geeks) and non-technical (Windows drones) users. That way, if you turn on the system with no boot disk inserted, it boots right into windows happily. If you insert the boot disk, then you get Linux.

I suppose if you wanted to, you could get Mandy installed and working, then install RedHat with the option to create a boot disk, but not place a boot loader on the HD at all. Then if you wanted RH, you just pop in the disk and voila!
 
Old 03-16-2003, 11:21 PM   #11
futurist
Member
 
Registered: Mar 2002
Location: malaysia
Distribution: Mandriva 2006 RC1
Posts: 486

Original Poster
Rep: Reputation: 30
hi guys, how about i want to install SUSE as well , my 60GB HDD is vast, many spaces!
 
Old 03-16-2003, 11:43 PM   #12
jdc2048
Member
 
Registered: Jul 2002
Location: Ohio, USA
Distribution: Redhat, Gentoo, Solaris, HP-UX, etc...
Posts: 391

Rep: Reputation: 30
lets tackle one problem at a time, here.

You gotta learn to crawl before you can walk.

Judging by some of your posts, I would venture to guess that you are a newbie. The distros have their minor differences, but overall, they are about the same. I would just learn the basics of one distro before trying another.

If you want to learn Linux quickly, then spend alot of time at www.tldp.org - These howtos are usually written so that a noob can pick them up and figure them out quickly.
 
Old 03-16-2003, 11:53 PM   #13
MasterC
LQ Guru
 
Registered: Mar 2002
Location: Salt Lake City, UT - USA
Distribution: Gentoo ; LFS ; Kubuntu
Posts: 12,612

Rep: Reputation: 64
I completely agree, sorta.

I think learning how to walk before you run is one thing, but tri-installing is no harder than dual. So it's not necessarily a step forward as much as a side step...

As for the boot disk idea, yeah it works, but it doesn't really teach you how to edit/use your bootloader. It teaches you how to slide in a floppy. I'd say take a bootloader, figure it out, learn how to manipulate it so you can boot all your OS/distros, that's learning how to walk.



Cool
 
Old 03-17-2003, 12:12 AM   #14
futurist
Member
 
Registered: Mar 2002
Location: malaysia
Distribution: Mandriva 2006 RC1
Posts: 486

Original Poster
Rep: Reputation: 30


yeah,
i am too hasty,

actually i prefer mandrake, but since i got also the redhat CDs, and my HDD is vast, i plan to install redhat too.........
 
  


Reply


Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off



Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
How To Installing The Redhat Linux 9.0 In The Maxtor Sata Hdd? radha_it Linux - General 8 01-17-2008 11:37 AM
Redhat 9.0 installation problems on Sata HDD scamjunk24 Linux - Newbie 3 08-17-2004 09:23 AM
Using HDD for Mandrake Move webterractive Mandriva 0 04-24-2004 12:01 AM
maximum hdd on redhat 8 milesdv Linux - Hardware 5 08-15-2003 06:24 AM
RedHat didn't recognize HDD properties correctly motyl Linux - Hardware 1 05-12-2003 06:13 PM


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 10:59 AM.

Main Menu
Advertisement
My LQ
Write for LQ
LinuxQuestions.org is looking for people interested in writing Editorials, Articles, Reviews, and more. If you'd like to contribute content, let us know.
Main Menu
Syndicate
RSS1  Latest Threads
RSS1  LQ News
Twitter: @linuxquestions
Facebook: linuxquestions Google+: linuxquestions
Open Source Consulting | Domain Registration