Linux - Software This forum is for Software issues.
Having a problem installing a new program? Want to know which application is best for the job? Post your question in this forum. |
| Notices |
Welcome to LinuxQuestions.org, a friendly and active Linux Community.
You are currently viewing LQ as a guest. By joining our community you will have the ability to post topics, receive our newsletter, use the advanced search, subscribe to threads and access many other special features. Registration is quick, simple and absolutely free. Join our community today!
Note that registered members see fewer ads, and ContentLink is completely disabled once you log in.
Are you new to LinuxQuestions.org? Visit the following links:
Site Howto |
Site FAQ |
Sitemap |
Register Now
If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us. If you need to reset your password, click here.
Having a problem logging in? Please visit this page to clear all LQ-related cookies.
 |
GNU/Linux Basic Guide
This 255-page guide will provide you with the keys to understand the philosophy of free software, teach you how to use and handle it, and give you the tools required to move easily in the world of GNU/Linux. Many users and administrators will be taking their first steps with this GNU/Linux Basic guide and it will show you how to approach and solve the problems you encounter.
Click Here to receive this Complete Guide absolutely free. |
|
 |
08-28-2009, 08:25 AM
|
#1
|
|
LQ Newbie
Registered: Mar 2009
Posts: 16
Rep:
|
Linux Unified kernel on 64-bit?
Is the LUK available at all for 64-bit?
Using Ubuntu 9.04 64-bit.
I can only find 32-bit binaries on the downloads page and compiling from source with the "make" command gives this:
make -Wall -C /lib/modules/`uname -r`/build SUBDIRS=`pwd` EXTRA_CFLAGS="-I`pwd`/include" modules
make[1]: Entering directory `/usr/src/linux-headers-2.6.28-11-generic'
CC [M] /home/tim/Desktop/unifiedkernel-0.2.4/module/ke/wait.o
In file included from /home/tim/Desktop/unifiedkernel-0.2.4/module/ke/wait.c:33:
/home/tim/Desktop/unifiedkernel-0.2.4/module/include/apc.h:35:28: error: linux/winternl.h: No such file or directory
In file included from /home/tim/Desktop/unifiedkernel-0.2.4/module/include/win32.h:38,
from /home/tim/Desktop/unifiedkernel-0.2.4/module/include/apc.h:39,
from /home/tim/Desktop/unifiedkernel-0.2.4/module/ke/wait.c:33:
/home/tim/Desktop/unifiedkernel-0.2.4/module/include/win32_process.h:34:32: error: linux/win32_thread.h: No such file or directory
make[2]: *** [/home/tim/Desktop/unifiedkernel-0.2.4/module/ke/wait.o] Error 1
make[1]: *** [_module_/home/tim/Desktop/unifiedkernel-0.2.4/module] Error 2
make[1]: Leaving directory `/usr/src/linux-headers-2.6.28-11-generic'
make: *** [default] Error 2
|
|
|
|
08-29-2009, 03:03 AM
|
#2
|
|
Member
Registered: Jan 2006
Distribution: Debian Testing ALWAYS!!!
Posts: 363
Rep:
|
Probably won't be 64 bit, since 64 bit windows is still very new itself... I'm guessing it's 32 bit only, and it will probably stay that way since the majority of windows software is still 32 bit only. Even if you got it running for 64 bit I'm betting the SysWOW isn't there so no 32 bit programs. =S
|
|
|
|
08-29-2009, 05:16 AM
|
#3
|
|
Gentoo support team
Registered: May 2008
Location: Lucena, Córdoba (Spain)
Distribution: Gentoo
Posts: 3,965
|
http://www.longene.org/forum/viewtopic.php?f=19&t=1623
I don't think it will be even possible in a short term. As far as I know, LUK still use wine for lots of things, though they plan to move some parts of it into the kernel, note that wine itself can't be compiled as a 64 bits program. It works in 64 bits Linuxes, but only because 64 bits linuxes can run 32 bits programs. Wine hasn't been ported to compile on x86_64 natively.
|
|
|
|
08-29-2009, 01:59 PM
|
#4
|
|
Member
Registered: Jan 2006
Distribution: Debian Testing ALWAYS!!!
Posts: 363
Rep:
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by i92guboj
http://www.longene.org/forum/viewtopic.php?f=19&t=1623
I don't think it will be even possible in a short term. As far as I know, LUK still use wine for lots of things, though they plan to move some parts of it into the kernel, note that wine itself can't be compiled as a 64 bits program. It works in 64 bits Linuxes, but only because 64 bits linuxes can run 32 bits programs. Wine hasn't been ported to compile on x86_64 natively.
|
You can, but I don't know if the 64 bit compile runs 32bit and 64 bit or just 64 bit windows apps. I think that's probably the main reason they haven't been working much on the 64 bit version, most applications are still 32 bit. =( a lot of development has to come yet.
http://wiki.winehq.org/Wine64
I'm pretty sure it only runs 64 bit programs.
|
|
|
|
08-29-2009, 02:55 PM
|
#5
|
|
Gentoo support team
Registered: May 2008
Location: Lucena, Córdoba (Spain)
Distribution: Gentoo
Posts: 3,965
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by mushroomboy
You can, but I don't know if the 64 bit compile runs 32bit and 64 bit or just 64 bit windows apps. I think that's probably the main reason they haven't been working much on the 64 bit version, most applications are still 32 bit. =( a lot of development has to come yet.
http://wiki.winehq.org/Wine64
I'm pretty sure it only runs 64 bit programs.
|
Yes, when you turn the 64 bits option on it won't be able to run regular windows x86 stuff. I heard about this 64 bits stuff, but I was under the impression that wine itself was a 32 bits binary regardless, maybe I was wrong. Still, it seems like it isn't too mature yet.
Last edited by i92guboj; 08-29-2009 at 02:58 PM.
|
|
|
|
08-29-2009, 03:46 PM
|
#6
|
|
Member
Registered: Jan 2006
Distribution: Debian Testing ALWAYS!!!
Posts: 363
Rep:
|
Source is neither 32bit or 64bit... basically it doesn't matter if you want to make a 64 bit wine but...that is the problem, as it only seems to run 64 bit code so I don't think devlopment will go very far any time soon.
|
|
|
|
08-29-2009, 11:13 PM
|
#7
|
|
Gentoo support team
Registered: May 2008
Location: Lucena, Córdoba (Spain)
Distribution: Gentoo
Posts: 3,965
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by mushroomboy
Source is neither 32bit or 64bit...
|
That would be the ideal status of things. The fact is that not all source code compiles in all architectures. Let's take grub as an example, but there are many more. Lots of programs needed some fixes for amd64 when the arch was emerging, I know because Gentoo was in the front line when that happened  Most times it was trivial to fix them, just a few minor inconsistencies in the data types to fix some assumptions that the programmers shouldn't have made in the first place. But some others can take more time to fix, and I assume that's why wine hasn't had a 64 bits version at all until very recent times.
Source *can* be arch-specific, the kernel has bits of arch-specific code, for another example. But even when the code is not arch-specific, the 32 vs. 64 bits can arise due to miss-alignments and other problems that can arise due to the different lengths in the data types.
Last edited by i92guboj; 08-29-2009 at 11:27 PM.
|
|
|
|
| Thread Tools |
Search this Thread |
|
|
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
All times are GMT -5. The time now is 06:57 PM.
|
|
LinuxQuestions.org is looking for people interested in writing
Editorials, Articles, Reviews, and more. If you'd like to contribute
content, let us know.
|
Latest Threads
LQ News
|
|