Linux - SoftwareThis forum is for Software issues.
Having a problem installing a new program? Want to know which application is best for the job? Post your question in this forum.
Welcome to LinuxQuestions.org, a friendly and active Linux Community.
You are currently viewing LQ as a guest. By joining our community you will have the ability to post topics, receive our newsletter, use the advanced search, subscribe to threads and access many other special features. Registration is quick, simple and absolutely free. Join our community today!
Note that registered members see fewer ads, and ContentLink is completely disabled once you log in.
If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us. If you need to reset your password, click here.
Having a problem logging in? Please visit this page to clear all LQ-related cookies.
Introduction to Linux - A Hands on Guide
This guide was created as an overview of the Linux Operating System, geared toward new users as an exploration tour and getting started guide, with exercises at the end of each chapter.
For more advanced trainees it can be a desktop reference, and a collection of the base knowledge needed to proceed with system and network administration. This book contains many real life examples derived from the author's experience as a Linux system and network administrator, trainer and consultant. They hope these examples will help you to get a better understanding of the Linux system and that you feel encouraged to try out things on your own.
Click Here to receive this Complete Guide absolutely free.
When I was reading this on /. I saw a remark about only being able to rewrite the same file size and cases where this would not work with a small file.
Is this correct? Sounds more like a "possibility" than a "done deal".
Linux NTFS write support has been here for ages.
It's even included in the vanilla 2.6 kernel. It's rather risky and experimental, but it's been here for a long while. That driver is a small improvement, and everyone who uses it is techinally breaking the law. I don't think it's legal to distribute their dll. So no corporate use of it.
Personally, I don't count write support that is experimental and comes with a "probabable file corruption" warning as "been there for ages".
As far as "techinally breaking the law", if one has a valid Windows license, is that the case?
They are saying that it is safe to use, with no file loss, etc whereas the current ones are considered "Experimental". I'd hardly say this has been out for ages when you have the risk of losing all files on that HDD with NTFS. This one apparently doesn't have this problem, so really no, it hasn't been out for ages.
Sorry, Grim Reaper. I know the captive NTFS is new, and am keeping an eye on the news about it like you. My previous post was directed to teval's post which seems to refer to the fact that Linux has neen able to access Window's NTFS partitions for a long time, but not safely.
I like to jump on these posts, sometimes, so more than one POV is included.