Linux - SoftwareThis forum is for Software issues.
Having a problem installing a new program? Want to know which application is best for the job? Post your question in this forum.
Notices
Welcome to LinuxQuestions.org, a friendly and active Linux Community.
You are currently viewing LQ as a guest. By joining our community you will have the ability to post topics, receive our newsletter, use the advanced search, subscribe to threads and access many other special features. Registration is quick, simple and absolutely free. Join our community today!
Note that registered members see fewer ads, and ContentLink is completely disabled once you log in.
If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us. If you need to reset your password, click here.
Having a problem logging in? Please visit this page to clear all LQ-related cookies.
Get a virtual cloud desktop with the Linux distro that you want in less than five minutes with Shells! With over 10 pre-installed distros to choose from, the worry-free installation life is here! Whether you are a digital nomad or just looking for flexibility, Shells can put your Linux machine on the device that you want to use.
Exclusive for LQ members, get up to 45% off per month. Click here for more info.
When someone says the term "network OS" to me, I can't say I'm familiar with what it means, but the word is a little like the term "car-boat" - you know what it is before you've seen it.
I've looked around and not found very much on this subject on a google search. So here's what I think a network OS is. It's actually a distributed OS, so that your /usr files could be on a server in Sydney, using that server's idle process cycles to process commands, and your /home branch is on a server in Stockholm, using that server's processors. You connect to it using some kind of broadband line and it looks to you, like a normal OS only it's using many different processors located around the world.
I have 2 questions.
1. Is this a correct summary of what a network OS is? Do you have another definition?
2. Is Linux a network OS in it's present form? (I think it is.
That's about right, you can have a file server at Norht Pole, and you can seat somewhere near South Pole chilling with penguins, and up in the space you can have a dedicated satellite with your friend on board, two of you are using the North Pole fileserver with no problem, some conditions though must be met: all three of you have to run linux/UNIX/*BSD; the satellite service must be configured to run correctly, in addition to it you can run a webserver on your machine, and your friend up in the space could run firewall/router, just throw some more machines connected by ethernet/fiber/wireless/etc. and you can dominate the world with linux with one network and one OS - and here would be ultra Internet.
I've got different definition of network OS (maybe more modern one). "Network OS" is for me an OS that makes switching from local resources to remote ones transparent. Linux is evolving this direction, but it isn't there yet. I'm dreaming of having a possibility to have a symlink in my filesystem to webpages, for example. Impossible. ;(
I thought that being a network OS had more to do with origins than the future. Linux is a somewhat estranged offspring from Unix (in any of its various guises). Unix was used in large institutes and academia, where having files on one machine only accessable by that machine was wasteful - so you could access the files on a remote machine as if they were present locally (of course username permitting).
As for the future of Networked OSs...who can say?
Symlinking a webpage onto your local filesystem? I'm not sure about this (yet) but there has been work on ftpfs, so you could reasonably symlink to files held on a ftp server, so long as that server had been mounted already. Perhaps there is work on httpfs, but somehow I can't see this being an easy task.
Originally posted by Bert Of course, you can have desktop links to webpages, no problem.
I think your definition's the same Mara, as symlinks to remote files is the same as having remote directories.
Bert
I can have links on desktop. But I work usually on console. What I'd like to have are symlinks to different programming resources. Now I use aliases (lynx www.....), but it's not the best method I can think about. I'd like to have /home/mara/progs/sourceforge directory, for example - a symlink to sourceforge website (well, not only website...).
My definition is more on feelings, not the technical part. I mean, it's tachnicaly possible to do it, but I don't know such a solution.
I am a new user & found this question interesting. My reasons for Linux being a Network OS are:
1) Linux works very well for Internet Services like HTTP, FTP, DNS, etc.,
2) Linux helps us to develop customized applns.
Of course, the big difference between Linux and a proprietary network operating system is that Linux is open-source, so it can be seen, used, modified, or augmented by anyone.
LinuxQuestions.org is looking for people interested in writing
Editorials, Articles, Reviews, and more. If you'd like to contribute
content, let us know.