Linux - SoftwareThis forum is for Software issues.
Having a problem installing a new program? Want to know which application is best for the job? Post your question in this forum.
Welcome to LinuxQuestions.org, a friendly and active Linux Community.
You are currently viewing LQ as a guest. By joining our community you will have the ability to post topics, receive our newsletter, use the advanced search, subscribe to threads and access many other special features. Registration is quick, simple and absolutely free. Join our community today!
Note that registered members see fewer ads, and ContentLink is completely disabled once you log in.
If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us. If you need to reset your password, click here.
Having a problem logging in? Please visit this page to clear all LQ-related cookies.
Introduction to Linux - A Hands on Guide
This guide was created as an overview of the Linux Operating System, geared toward new users as an exploration tour and getting started guide, with exercises at the end of each chapter.
For more advanced trainees it can be a desktop reference, and a collection of the base knowledge needed to proceed with system and network administration. This book contains many real life examples derived from the author's experience as a Linux system and network administrator, trainer and consultant. They hope these examples will help you to get a better understanding of the Linux system and that you feel encouraged to try out things on your own.
Click Here to receive this Complete Guide absolutely free.
Lilo complains about the device-mapper is missing from kernel.
"/proc/misc", "Is device mapper missing from kernel?".
This has been reported before and is still occurring.
The device-mapper is missing because it is now optional under the
MD config items with the RAID and LVM stuff. From what I have determined, it must only be needed to handle the mapping of a logical volume address to multiple drives/partitions/sectors.
Lilo was able to cope with simple drives since its creation, and apparently still does, although it gives no indication of it in its complaining.
In my opinion, this is a Lilo bug. It should cope silently with kernels that do not have RAID/LVM and not look like an installation error.
The problem is that the same message (looks identical) has shown up in a non-Lilo related posting.
Question: Is this message coming from somewhere other than Lilo ??
Question: Does everyone who dares turn off the RAID/LVM support have to put up with these kind of error messages ??
Question: In a simple system without RAID and no LVM, are all such missing device-mapper messages bogus ?? That is does anyone know of any situation where the message indicated something important ??
Question: Do users WITHOUT RAID/LVM need to put in the device-mapper
for any other use (besides shutting up Lilo) ??
I have seen that message on pretty much every machine I have ever installed LILO on, and always just ignore it. LILO seems rather verbose in general (I.E. warning about LBA 48, even though that is what everyone wants), so I have gotten used to it. It isn't like you have to re-run LILO that often anyway (unless you are a kernel fanatic or something).
Thanks for replying.
After 10 years of using Lilo, this is the first time I have seen this error message.
It only showed up on the latest Slackware relase 13.1 (my previous is Slackware 10.2, which apparently has device-mapper always present).
I assume, that if you are seeing this message too, that you are doing many installs without RAID/LVM, or all that, and are not seeing any other problems.
I could not find the error messages in
>> strings /sbin/lilo
nor could I them in the kernel, nor by grep kernel source.
I do not know where they actually come from.