LinuxQuestions.org
Did you know LQ has a Linux Hardware Compatibility List?
Go Back   LinuxQuestions.org > Forums > Linux Forums > Linux - Software
User Name
Password
Linux - Software This forum is for Software issues.
Having a problem installing a new program? Want to know which application is best for the job? Post your question in this forum.

Notices

Reply
 
Search this Thread
Old 07-07-2011, 02:58 PM   #1
newbiesforever
Senior Member
 
Registered: Apr 2006
Location: Glendale, AZ
Distribution: Distro-homeless. Lost.
Posts: 1,868

Rep: Reputation: 62
LibreOffice


I have heard of a new OpenOffice-based office suite called LibreOffice. Does anyone recommend it over OpenOffice? That LibreOffice exists in the first place suggests someone was not satisfied with OpenOffice for some reason. The only negative aspects I know of OpenOffice are that it's slow and that last time I checked, only the word processor was clearly a match for its Microsoft Office counterpart.

Last edited by newbiesforever; 07-07-2011 at 03:00 PM.
 
Old 07-07-2011, 03:04 PM   #2
Cultist
Member
 
Registered: Feb 2010
Location: Chicago, IL
Distribution: Slackware64 14.1
Posts: 777

Rep: Reputation: 101Reputation: 101
A lot of people swear by it. I recently started using it instead of OpenOffice. Maybe there are other things about it that don't affect me, but I see very little difference between the two, as far as my own use is concerned.
 
1 members found this post helpful.
Old 07-07-2011, 03:07 PM   #3
weibullguy
ReliaFree Maintainer
 
Registered: Aug 2004
Location: Kalamazoo, Michigan
Distribution: Slackware-current, Cross Linux from Scratch, Gentoo
Posts: 2,701
Blog Entries: 1

Rep: Reputation: 219Reputation: 219Reputation: 219
I haven't used it, so I can't recommend it. LibreOffice is another office suite developed by The Document Foundation; not sure if this is in anyway associated with Sun. Like other type of application, I'm sure someone wasn't satisfied with what was available (OpenOffice, KOffice, etc.) and decided to develop something else. Doesn't mean one is better than the other, just different way of solving the same problem.
 
Old 07-07-2011, 03:27 PM   #4
Duron
Member
 
Registered: Aug 2006
Location: Michigan, USA
Distribution: Crunchbang Statler, Mint Debian
Posts: 55

Rep: Reputation: 19
LibreOffice came into existence because after Oracle acquired Sun, OpenOffice community members looked to them to address a lot of grievances that they'd had with Sun for a long time - mostly related to copyright and merging contributed code, as I understand it.

LibreOffice is different in that it's vendor-neutral. Other than that and a somewhat nicer splash screen/startup window, you won't see many GUI changes, if at all.
 
1 members found this post helpful.
Old 07-07-2011, 04:59 PM   #5
salasi
Senior Member
 
Registered: Jul 2007
Location: Directly above centre of the earth, UK
Distribution: SuSE, plus some hopping
Posts: 3,887

Rep: Reputation: 774Reputation: 774Reputation: 774Reputation: 774Reputation: 774Reputation: 774Reputation: 774
Well, due to the difficulties of dealing with Sun, there was already Go-OO, which many distros already used. In some ways, LO is he successor to Go-OO, brought about by the anticipation that the problems would get worse once Oracle got involved.

Since that time, Oracle have handed OO over to the Apache foundation, but, the way that things are going, that may well be too late.

I'm giving LO another release (there have been a couple of major releases already) to get the minor issues out, but I'm sure that it is usable already.
 
Old 07-07-2011, 05:56 PM   #6
craigevil
Senior Member
 
Registered: Apr 2005
Location: OZ
Distribution: Debian Sid
Posts: 4,732
Blog Entries: 12

Rep: Reputation: 455Reputation: 455Reputation: 455Reputation: 455Reputation: 455
Works fine here. Most distros have already made the switch from OpenOffice to LibreOffice.

apt-cache policy libreoffice
libreoffice:
Installed: 1:3.3.3-4+b1
Candidate: 1:3.3.3-4+b1
Version table:
*** 1:3.3.3-4+b1 0
500 http://mirrors.kernel.org/debian/ unstable/main i386 Packages
100 /var/lib/dpkg/status

Debian changes to LibreOffice | ThinkLinux - http://www.thinklinux.com/2011/06/de...o-libreoffice/

As the OP is running Mepis:
SimplyMEPIS 11 adds LibreOffice and a faster Firefox 4 - http://www.linuxfordevices.com/c/a/N...EPIS-11-ships/

Last edited by craigevil; 07-07-2011 at 06:00 PM.
 
Old 07-07-2011, 08:58 PM   #7
frankbell
Guru
 
Registered: Jan 2006
Location: Virginia, USA
Distribution: Slackware, Debian, Mageia, Mint
Posts: 7,411

Rep: Reputation: 1404Reputation: 1404Reputation: 1404Reputation: 1404Reputation: 1404Reputation: 1404Reputation: 1404Reputation: 1404Reputation: 1404Reputation: 1404
I have been quite satisfied with LO. I tested it with release candidate 1 and completely switched to it by release candidate 3.

The first official release was simply to get a good solid working version crafted. Significant changes will come later, but I would not expect LO to look radically different. I believe the project wants to concentrate on function, not on looks.

You can learn a lot about the genesis of LO from the FAQ: http://www.documentfoundation.org/faq/
 
Old 07-08-2011, 08:25 PM   #8
newbiesforever
Senior Member
 
Registered: Apr 2006
Location: Glendale, AZ
Distribution: Distro-homeless. Lost.
Posts: 1,868

Original Poster
Rep: Reputation: 62
Then might OO become obsolete?
 
Old 07-08-2011, 08:44 PM   #9
frankbell
Guru
 
Registered: Jan 2006
Location: Virginia, USA
Distribution: Slackware, Debian, Mageia, Mint
Posts: 7,411

Rep: Reputation: 1404Reputation: 1404Reputation: 1404Reputation: 1404Reputation: 1404Reputation: 1404Reputation: 1404Reputation: 1404Reputation: 1404Reputation: 1404
OO might become obsolete for either or both of two reasons that I can see. The last I heard, Oracle was making overtures to Apache to take it over; I have not heard whether that deal has been consummated:

1. Distributions abandoning it because of the suspicion with which Oracle is viewed in the free and open source community.

2. Apache choosing not to follow through with OO, even if they take over the license. Many persons in the community think that Apache should either conceded the field to LO or pass the OO trademarks (that's really all the LO does not have, since the code is open source) on to the Document Foundation.

Many OO developers have already moved to LO.

I've been working intensively with LO for the past several months and can attest that the internal workings are the same as OO's. My OO templates, which I have heavily customized over the past three years, work seamlessly in LO.
 
1 members found this post helpful.
  


Reply


Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
LibreOffice mlpa Slackware 133 04-30-2012 09:40 AM
Opening LibreOffice johnkelly.110 Linux - Software 1 05-31-2011 08:59 PM
[SOLVED] LibreOffice 3.3 not working sudeepkulkarni Slackware 5 04-10-2011 07:28 AM
LibreOffice en_GB? Gavin Harper Slackware 6 01-28-2011 10:10 PM
LibreOffice installing TheStefan12345 Linux - Newbie 3 01-28-2011 06:17 AM


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 10:26 AM.

Main Menu
My LQ
Write for LQ
LinuxQuestions.org is looking for people interested in writing Editorials, Articles, Reviews, and more. If you'd like to contribute content, let us know.
Main Menu
Syndicate
RSS1  Latest Threads
RSS1  LQ News
Twitter: @linuxquestions
identi.ca: @linuxquestions
Facebook: linuxquestions Google+: linuxquestions
Open Source Consulting | Domain Registration