Linux - SoftwareThis forum is for Software issues.
Having a problem installing a new program? Want to know which application is best for the job? Post your question in this forum.
Notices
Welcome to LinuxQuestions.org, a friendly and active Linux Community.
You are currently viewing LQ as a guest. By joining our community you will have the ability to post topics, receive our newsletter, use the advanced search, subscribe to threads and access many other special features. Registration is quick, simple and absolutely free. Join our community today!
Note that registered members see fewer ads, and ContentLink is completely disabled once you log in.
If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us. If you need to reset your password, click here.
Having a problem logging in? Please visit this page to clear all LQ-related cookies.
Get a virtual cloud desktop with the Linux distro that you want in less than five minutes with Shells! With over 10 pre-installed distros to choose from, the worry-free installation life is here! Whether you are a digital nomad or just looking for flexibility, Shells can put your Linux machine on the device that you want to use.
Exclusive for LQ members, get up to 45% off per month. Click here for more info.
Please, I'd like to know some opinions and arguments from you, experts on Linux.
I see people saying it's not good to use KDE programs on Gnome (and vice-versa), but I also see the opposite, people saying there's no problem at all. So, I want to know your opinions.
I'm using Ubuntu 11.10 and Unity (no graphics acceleration, so I can't use Gnome Shell). Is it recommended to install a KDE program on Gnome or not? And why?
MTK358, don't those libraries you mentioned cause a mess on Gnome? (Sorry, just a newbie thought.)
cascade9, isn't the fallback mode less featured? I've read that the fallback mode is not "complete", so to say. That's why I don't use it. Isn't that true?
I have used a lot of KDE programs in Gnome and never been bothered by either of the two issues that I have heard about (I think these are the same issues MTK358 described a little differently):
1) Memory usage. KDE programs use different .so files than Gnome and its programs. When you use KDE programs in Gnome, you end up with both sets of .so files in memory at once. On a small memory system that can have a big impact on performance. I've never tried it on a small memory system.
2) "Theme issues": Consistent look and color scheme etc. Personally I'm so oblivious to this sort of thing I can't competently discuss it. I totally don't care about this issue. I want functionality, not beauty, from all UI's. But some people really care about "theme" issues and if I understand correctly, you can't get everything to look just right when mixing environments.
Quote:
Originally Posted by brunces
don't those libraries you mentioned cause a mess on Gnome? (Sorry, just a newbie thought.)
What's a "mess"? There is no inherent conflict nor interference. The extra .so files just use a little extra ram, so similar user activities need slightly less total ram if all done with the same GUI toolkit than if mixed.
I see people saying it's not good to use KDE programs on Gnome (and vice-versa), but I also see the opposite, people saying there's no problem at all. So, I want to know your opinions.
This isn't a matter of opinions, it is a matter of technical facts. Gnome and KDE are based on different toolkits (GTK and QT) and they store their settings in different locations and even in different formats. So they don't interfere at all. The only "problem" you will see, as already mentioned, is that they look different.
Quote:
don't those libraries you mentioned cause a mess on Gnome? (Sorry, just a newbie thought.)
This is a common misconception from Windows users which went to dll-hell. In Ubuntu it is normally not possible to overwrite system files that are installed by one package with files from other packages, if you use the repositories for installing. You would have to force the package manager (which is of course possible)to do something like that.
Long answer short: Use as many applications from one DE on the other, you will be fine.
cascade9, isn't the fallback mode less featured? I've read that the fallback mode is not "complete", so to say. That's why I don't use it. Isn't that true?
If you are comparing gnome 3 'fallback' to gnome 3 and listen to the gnome devs, or comapring unity 2D to gnome 3 fallback and listen to canonical/ubuntu propaganda, then fallback is not as 'complete' (or however they choose to put it). That is just gnome 'pushing' people to its new interface, same with canonical and unity/unity 2D.
Lots of people who dont like gnome 3/unity/unity 2D have moved desktop enviroment (eg to Lxde, Xfce, etc.) but quite a few have choosen gnome 3 'fallback' mode.....because its closer to the 'classic gnome' (gnome 2.X interface) than gnome 3/unity/unity 2D, and they dont want to move to Lxde/Xfce/etc. (for whatever reason).
Quote:
Originally Posted by Elv13
If you don't have hardware accel, you are already using the fallback mode. Is it less featured? Yes, but it's also faster.
Nope, Ubuntu 11.10 doesnt use gnome 3 'fallback' mode in stock form. 11.10 will give you unity 2D instead.
LinuxQuestions.org is looking for people interested in writing
Editorials, Articles, Reviews, and more. If you'd like to contribute
content, let us know.