LinuxQuestions.org
Share your knowledge at the LQ Wiki.
Go Back   LinuxQuestions.org > Forums > Linux Forums > Linux - Software
User Name
Password
Linux - Software This forum is for Software issues.
Having a problem installing a new program? Want to know which application is best for the job? Post your question in this forum.

Notices


Reply
  Search this Thread
Old 02-24-2004, 12:56 PM   #1
tarheel92x
Member
 
Registered: Sep 2003
Location: Southeast USA
Distribution: CentOS
Posts: 111

Rep: Reputation: 15
is freebsd linux


I have seen freeBSD refered to as a version of Unix rather than a distro of Linux. What is the difference?

Thanks
 
Old 02-24-2004, 01:01 PM   #2
jtshaw
Senior Member
 
Registered: Nov 2000
Location: Seattle, WA USA
Distribution: Ubuntu @ Home, RHEL @ Work
Posts: 3,892
Blog Entries: 1

Rep: Reputation: 67
FreeBSD is based of a fork of UNIX created by Berkeley University (BSD = Berkeley Software Distribution). It runs on an entirely different kernel (ie. not the Linux kernel). BSD has a license to call themselves UNIX officially. Linux does not.

Last edited by jtshaw; 02-24-2004 at 01:04 PM.
 
Old 02-24-2004, 01:52 PM   #3
frieza
Senior Member
 
Registered: Feb 2002
Location: harvard, il
Distribution: Ubuntu 11.4,DD-WRT micro plus ssh,lfs-6.6,Fedora 15,Fedora 16
Posts: 3,200

Rep: Reputation: 397Reputation: 397Reputation: 397Reputation: 397
ritght, bsd is based on a mach kernel linux is just that... a linux kernel
 
Old 02-24-2004, 02:33 PM   #4
Crito
Senior Member
 
Registered: Nov 2003
Location: Knoxville, TN
Distribution: Kubuntu 9.04
Posts: 1,168

Rep: Reputation: 53
You're confused for good reason. Techno-geeks think of the kernel and operating system as separate. In this context the kernel each uses would be irrelevant since UNIX is an operating system. Most people, however, think of them as integral components and, therefore, Linux as an OS, not just a kernel. Technically, again, neither is a registered UNIX system, so it's more accurate to call them UNIX-like. The kernel differentiates them but they're both basically UNIX clones.
 
Old 02-24-2004, 04:51 PM   #5
jago25_98
Member
 
Registered: Jun 2001
Posts: 296

Rep: Reputation: 30
In addition I think of it as the following:

BSD is to linux as Windows is to linux.

Linux tends to be chaotic in a good way. BSD is intended to be more predictable & reliable.
 
Old 02-24-2004, 07:38 PM   #6
SciYro
Senior Member
 
Registered: Oct 2003
Location: hopefully not here
Distribution: Gentoo
Posts: 2,038

Rep: Reputation: 51
does that mean all in linux can be explained in chaos theory?, like me see....... hmm i knew i shoulda learn that!,

but anyways, BSD's all have somthing tehy can all a OS, and everyhting else is a add on, in linux, everyhting is a add on (i think it adds to security personaly, at least it adds to my turst in that my system aint gonna crap out if a add another program ), soo you see?
 
Old 02-24-2004, 08:38 PM   #7
jtshaw
Senior Member
 
Registered: Nov 2000
Location: Seattle, WA USA
Distribution: Ubuntu @ Home, RHEL @ Work
Posts: 3,892
Blog Entries: 1

Rep: Reputation: 67
Ya, I was incorrect when I said BSD had a license to call themselves UNIX. That is definitely not true. The BSD kernel and the Linux kernel are fundementally very different. BSD uses a Mach based kernel (as frieza said) which is a micro kernel. In a microkernel you have a very small kernel that does as little as possible and a bunch of modules on top of that to handle the rest of the system. The Linux kernel is a monolithic kernel. It is huge and handles all the OS required tasks internally. It does have module support for some things, but it is not modular in the same sense the BSD kernel is.

Aside from the kernel, much of the other software is the same. BSD uses still largely develop using GCC. They use things like Apache, xfree86, ect.
 
  


Reply


Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off



Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
freeBSD better than LINUX !!! ravenstyles General 126 02-05-2005 01:35 PM
Linux 2.6 vs FreeBSD 5.3 GodSendDeath Linux - General 1 12-15-2004 12:56 AM
linux vs freebsd Ryan450 *BSD 2 08-28-2004 11:13 PM
Is FreeBSD better than Linux Time Lord *BSD 1 09-30-2003 10:15 AM
Linux vs FreeBSD which is better? javax Linux - Distributions 13 04-26-2002 09:40 AM


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 06:31 PM.

Main Menu
Advertisement
My LQ
Write for LQ
LinuxQuestions.org is looking for people interested in writing Editorials, Articles, Reviews, and more. If you'd like to contribute content, let us know.
Main Menu
Syndicate
RSS1  Latest Threads
RSS1  LQ News
Twitter: @linuxquestions
Facebook: linuxquestions Google+: linuxquestions
Open Source Consulting | Domain Registration