Linux - SoftwareThis forum is for Software issues.
Having a problem installing a new program? Want to know which application is best for the job? Post your question in this forum.
Notices
Welcome to LinuxQuestions.org, a friendly and active Linux Community.
You are currently viewing LQ as a guest. By joining our community you will have the ability to post topics, receive our newsletter, use the advanced search, subscribe to threads and access many other special features. Registration is quick, simple and absolutely free. Join our community today!
Note that registered members see fewer ads, and ContentLink is completely disabled once you log in.
If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us. If you need to reset your password, click here.
Having a problem logging in? Please visit this page to clear all LQ-related cookies.
Get a virtual cloud desktop with the Linux distro that you want in less than five minutes with Shells! With over 10 pre-installed distros to choose from, the worry-free installation life is here! Whether you are a digital nomad or just looking for flexibility, Shells can put your Linux machine on the device that you want to use.
Exclusive for LQ members, get up to 45% off per month. Click here for more info.
i have mandrake 9.0 and after deleting kde 3.0.5a and then realizing it didn't help anything, then reinstalling packages, i now have kde 3.0.3.
i am seriously confused and frustrated at this point. i want to install kde 3.1 or 3.1.1, so i downloaded most of what i could find of 3.1.1. but there's so many dependencies that i don't know what to do.
qt 3.1
fontconfig
libfontconfig...etc, etc.
but the dependencies are being stupid. if i try to install one, say libqt, it says "qt needed." so i try to install qt, and then it says "libqt needed." so all of my packages are tangled into one big annoying dependency, and i'm about ready to just throw all of my linux related software in the toilet and forget it exists...!!!!!
so if anyone could help me, that'd be nice...thanks for reading.
Are we running ldconfig after updating the libraries?
Are the libraries installing to a path that the new installs are looking in?
There are also some environment variables that may also need to be setup for some of those libraries (paths being the most common culprit). Once you have made these changes you may need to reread the environment variables (ie: if you need to add or alter a path statement in your /etc/profile you need to 'source /etc/profile' to load those variables for the current session).
here are some of the things that i apparently need...
libXft.so.2
libfontconfig.so.1 (this one needs the one below)
fontconfig-2.1.4 (but this needs the above one)
libc.so.6(GLIBC_2.3)
libqt3 (needs the two below)
libqt3-common, and libqt3-devel(both need the one above)
and in order to install GLIB_2.3.1, i have to basically uninstall every package i have...???...???...
I don't think you have to uninstall all the packages, but if you're installing the packages built specifically for your distribution then there may be a problem with dependancies (when they were packaged as rpms)
i was hoping to avoid that, just because it takes a while to download the ISOs and i actually bought 9.0...so i was hoping my $40 would last a little longer. but i suppose if it's just designed not to run kde 3.1, then i'll have to upgrade to 9.1...it's strange how kde would upgrade their gui making it near impossible for people to upgrade...but oh well.
It's not near impossible, it's just not something a newbie should be doing. Stuff like the kernel, glibc, X, KDE/GNOME - these are all core system components. An OS upgrade for that is reasonable. Mandrake *is* free you know, you can always get CDs from cheapbytes
Hi I am now running KDE3.1 with Mandrake 9.1, however before I downloaded 9.1 I had 9.0 and I did find a site where someone had built KDE3.1 for Mandrake 9.0 and posted it. There were 4-5 unresolved dependencies when I tried it, so I had to download the files from the site, find the dependency files (easy with google - and they did not bring up loads more) and use KPackage to install the lot, and it worked fine.
I would recommend, however, that you do the upgrade to Mandrake 9.1 because the software update/add and remove software section in the control centre works a lot better, it was in my experience flawed in 9.0 - I found myself dependent on KPackage for adding programs.
thanks for the notice...perhaps i'll have to spend a few days downloading 9.1, but i hope it'll last a little longer. has anyone stopped to wonder why, if these OSs are so great, do they keep releasing newer versions? i understand they need fixes, etc...but it seems a little counter-productive to continually release all new versions every few months. maybe i'm sounding crazy, i don't know.
This is a frustrating thing about RPM that the Debian folks always point out. (Their package system automagically resolves dependencies in these situations) What you have to do is give RPM
ALL the packages it needs at the same time. So if you need package X, and it depends on Y, and Y depends on Z, you say:
rpm -Uvh X.rpm Y.rpm Z.rpm
Now you may discover that Z depends on A. Just add it to the end of the list:
rpm -Uvh X.rpm Y.rpm Z.rpm A.rpm
Eventually you'll get all the dependencies worked out. Command line recall is your friend. 8)
That's not crazy. It's one reason why the Linux companies are able to make money off their "Enterprise class" versions. Those are far more stable than the free versions. This appeals to companies (and, importantly, to software vendors) that need a stable system to base a business on.
The short answer as to why distros change so frequently is that that's how fast open source software is changing. You wanted KDE 3.1. Well, that depends on a newer version of QT, which depends on newer versions of other system libraries and so on. Red Hat has signaled that they are going to be accelerating the rate at which they incorporate new software into their consumer version. For example, they included a new thread library in 9, which broke a lot of other software. A cynic would say they are doing this so that their stable Advanced Server product will look even more attractive to corporate buyers. A less cynical observer might say that it's a play for the software enthusiasts that have always been the backbone of Linux. I think the answer is "yes."
By the way, I use Red Hat 9. I went in to it with open eyes so the fact that Crossover Office (based on WINE) broke didn't surprise or outrage me. I just got that app back about two weeks ago, which shows that other open source developers are working just as hard as Red Hat to disrupt my life. 8)
One thing: you may not need the -devel version, and maybe you'll get lucky and that will solve the problem. Another possibility is that your RPM database has a problem, what with all the activity. You can rebuild it with rpm --rebuilddb. Finally, where are you getting all these RPMs? Are you sure they are right for your distro and hardware? The i586 designation refers to certain Cyrix CPUs, as I recall. If you have a PII or better, you should look for i686 versions. The i386 should work fine too.
If I may add a comment. You can get MDK 9.1 or RH 8 or 9 at www.spidertools.com for $5.49 with shipping. It is the basic 3 disc package, no support, but the CDs work great. Or check ebay, both are selling for $5-10 right now. It might be worth $5 - 10 just to avoid the dependency "hell." It was to me.
LinuxQuestions.org is looking for people interested in writing
Editorials, Articles, Reviews, and more. If you'd like to contribute
content, let us know.