Linux - SoftwareThis forum is for Software issues.
Having a problem installing a new program? Want to know which application is best for the job? Post your question in this forum.
Notices
Welcome to LinuxQuestions.org, a friendly and active Linux Community.
You are currently viewing LQ as a guest. By joining our community you will have the ability to post topics, receive our newsletter, use the advanced search, subscribe to threads and access many other special features. Registration is quick, simple and absolutely free. Join our community today!
Note that registered members see fewer ads, and ContentLink is completely disabled once you log in.
I agree with andrew, svn is the way foward, if only to save bandwidth. I've used x264 now and again, it fairly easy to get up and running. I'd normally proceed as follows:
Code:
svn co svn://svn.videolan.org/x264/trunk x264
cd x264
./configure --prefix=/usr/local --enable-shared
## personally I wouldn't use --enable-gtk, its not necessary for mplayer
make
[as root]make install
I use nasm myself, If you can use an assembler you definitely should, it will make a difference. No need to strip anything, it's all done automatically.
mplayer's configure script should detect x264 automatically. If it can't find /usr/local/include/x264.h then you have bigger problems
Now onto more interesting topics:
Quote:
Yeah, there are hundreds of instances of "Linux" people sabotaging Linux software, in particular, video and music software.
Usually, they (indirectly) work for the RIAA, MPAA, etc.
That's a pretty heavy accusation. Do you really believe that videolan, the people who bring us libdvdcss, libdca, x264 etc and other groups are being sabotaged from the inside by the powers that be? It sounds a bit silly to me. Or do you have some reliable sources?
Secondly:
Quote:
So how come the moderators who have written books on mplayer never help.
I guess they are not here to help at all.
No need for smartass comments. It's not going to endear you to anyone here.
I agree with andrew, svn is the way foward, if only to save bandwidth. I've used x264 now and again, it fairly easy to get up and running.
I agree that generally svn is better because it gives you very recent code. However, the x264 source is packaged daily, so....
Quote:
Originally Posted by Daws
That's a pretty heavy accusation.
It also true. There are many people working very hard to make the code the best they can and many working very hard to make it unusable for the majority.
Take a look at the history of the NTFS kernel driver as an example.
LinuxQuestions.org is looking for people interested in writing
Editorials, Articles, Reviews, and more. If you'd like to contribute
content, let us know.