LinuxQuestions.org
Go Job Hunting at the LQ Job Marketplace
Go Back   LinuxQuestions.org > Forums > Linux Forums > Linux - Software
User Name
Password
Linux - Software This forum is for Software issues.
Having a problem installing a new program? Want to know which application is best for the job? Post your question in this forum.

Notices

Reply
 
Search this Thread
Old 05-21-2010, 02:54 PM   #1
newbiesforever
Senior Member
 
Registered: Apr 2006
Location: Glendale, AZ
Distribution: Distro-homeless. Lost.
Posts: 1,878

Rep: Reputation: 62
Google Chrome isn't ready


Others have probably noticed this already, but I just tried the Google Chrome beta, and wish to share my results. Unless my system has its own proble, Google Chrome definitely needs more work. It made my system extremely slow, almost freezing it, until I gave up and uninstalled it. Besides, only the browser--which is decidedly ugly--works in Linux. A friend wanted to talk with me on the chat application, but I found that it's still Windows-only.
 
Old 05-21-2010, 03:17 PM   #2
XavierP
Moderator
 
Registered: Nov 2002
Location: Kent, England
Distribution: Lubuntu
Posts: 19,176
Blog Entries: 4

Rep: Reputation: 430Reputation: 430Reputation: 430Reputation: 430Reputation: 430
I had a similar experience. If you are a KDE user, Rekonq (once developed, may be a better alternative.
 
Old 05-21-2010, 03:23 PM   #3
craigevil
Senior Member
 
Registered: Apr 2005
Location: OZ
Distribution: Debian Sid
Posts: 4,733
Blog Entries: 12

Rep: Reputation: 457Reputation: 457Reputation: 457Reputation: 457Reputation: 457
Doesn't do any of that but at least half the time I get a "Aw snap" because pages refuse to load in it , including things like gmail. The pages it does load it loads slower than Firefox.
 
Old 05-21-2010, 03:26 PM   #4
newbiesforever
Senior Member
 
Registered: Apr 2006
Location: Glendale, AZ
Distribution: Distro-homeless. Lost.
Posts: 1,878

Original Poster
Rep: Reputation: 62
At least Google is bothering. I understand that the Linux community begged it to, and felt that it was obligated to make Linux software because it has benefited from open-source code.
 
Old 05-21-2010, 03:31 PM   #5
ctkroeker
Senior Member
 
Registered: May 2005
Location: Paraguay
Posts: 1,565
Blog Entries: 1

Rep: Reputation: 50
Quote:
Originally Posted by craigevil View Post
Doesn't do any of that but at least half the time I get a "Aw snap" because pages refuse to load in it , including things like gmail. The pages it does load it loads slower than Firefox.
Same thing with my Chrome... Annoying as heck that it can't load Google's own pages.

Running latest alpha of firefox, much faster tab-switching and page rendering and uses less memory. More stable than the "stable" Firefox.
 
Old 05-21-2010, 03:46 PM   #6
EricTRA
Guru
 
Registered: May 2009
Location: Gibraltar, Gibraltar
Distribution: Fedora 20 with Awesome WM
Posts: 6,805
Blog Entries: 1

Rep: Reputation: 1291Reputation: 1291Reputation: 1291Reputation: 1291Reputation: 1291Reputation: 1291Reputation: 1291Reputation: 1291Reputation: 1291
Hi,

I'm using Google Chrome 5.0.360.5 dev and have not encountered those problems. I'm all the time using it and haven't had any problems yet with pages not loading. Only had some troubles a while ago because of DNS not correctly resolving which resulted in 'freezing'. I also use the dev version on Windows XP laptop I use at work with the same level of satisfaction. I recently switched to Xfce on my Slackware 13, coming from KDE and have used Chrome in both. In KDE Chrome seemed slower.

Kind regards,

Eric
 
Old 05-21-2010, 05:10 PM   #7
vigi
Member
 
Registered: May 2009
Location: australia
Distribution: slackware
Posts: 177

Rep: Reputation: 27
Quote:
Originally Posted by XavierP View Post
I had a similar experience. If you are a KDE user, Rekonq (once developed, may be a better alternative.
-------------------------------------------
I have just tried Chromium this week on my xubuntu installation; and it is refreshingly clean however firefox, and midori (and certainly rekonq in my slackware-kde setup) responds better.

Rekonq would be an excellent default browser for slackware once it reaches full stability. Between Konqueror, Seamonkey, firefox and rekonq I still find there are websites that do not work with all but firefox.
 
Old 05-21-2010, 05:40 PM   #8
craigevil
Senior Member
 
Registered: Apr 2005
Location: OZ
Distribution: Debian Sid
Posts: 4,733
Blog Entries: 12

Rep: Reputation: 457Reputation: 457Reputation: 457Reputation: 457Reputation: 457
I have tried both the 6.0.408.1 dev and the beta 5.0.375.53. With any version if I import Firefox settings Chrome refuses to load any webpages. Just sits there wit the activity thing spinning.

if I install any extensions it does the same thing.


If I leave it alone, no importing, no extensions, with default settings it works for a while. But even then after a few hours it stops loading webpages.

Meanwhile Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.9.2.4) Gecko/20100513 Firefox/3.6.4 flies
 
Old 05-21-2010, 05:49 PM   #9
damgar
Senior Member
 
Registered: Sep 2009
Location: dallas, tx
Distribution: Slackware - current multilib/gsb Arch
Posts: 1,949
Blog Entries: 8

Rep: Reputation: 201Reputation: 201Reputation: 201
I've been using google chrome since the linux betas came out and using the current-unstable for the last 2 months. I don't have any of the problems listed above. It doesn't work with gecko-media plugins installed and there is occasional weirdness with buttons on various web pages, but other than that it works just fine for me. I'm currently on 5.0.396.0 dev. It's definitely still beta, but I use it almost exclusively for everything on 3 machines with what I would call only minor annoyances. It's definitely faster than any other browser for me, and for what it's worth, the futuremark peacekeeper benchmarks double firefox and epiphany. Your mileage and opinions may vary of course.

Last edited by damgar; 05-21-2010 at 05:50 PM.
 
Old 05-21-2010, 11:52 PM   #10
disturbed1
Senior Member
 
Registered: Mar 2005
Location: USA
Distribution: Slackware
Posts: 1,133
Blog Entries: 6

Rep: Reputation: 223Reputation: 223Reputation: 223
Same experience as damgar with currently google-chrome-6.0.401.1-x86_64. Have been using Chrome for awhile now. I know the history file goes back to 01/01/2010. In the beginning there were quite a few aw-snaps. Sometime in the 5.x series these became almost non existent for me. There is still the occasional extremely annoying bug when center clicking on a link, a new tab does not open. This happens on www.SlackBuilds.org and www.dslreports.com - perhaps others? Also, adblock loads the ads first, then blocks them. Which is quite different and slower on some sites compared to adblock in Firefox/Seamonkey.

Could boil down to the plugins I have (only flash player and jre), or the websites I visit are mundane enough to not trigger the bugs others see. My girlfriend and our room mate are both into that social networking crap. If Chrome on Linux did not work properly with Facebook, Myspace, TMZ, E! .... I'd have two females demanding a fix by now

Between Chrome, Opera, Konq, Firefox, Seamonkey, and the other Mozilla + Webkit browsers, if you are not able to find a web browser to suite your needs, your just being too damn picky (IMO)
 
Old 05-22-2010, 08:24 AM   #11
MTK358
LQ 5k Club
 
Registered: Sep 2009
Posts: 6,443
Blog Entries: 3

Rep: Reputation: 714Reputation: 714Reputation: 714Reputation: 714Reputation: 714Reputation: 714Reputation: 714
I'm using Chromium 5.0.342.9, and it works nice.

Pages sometimes load a bit slowly, though.

I am not sure what the relationship between Chromium and Google Chrome is.
 
Old 05-22-2010, 02:01 PM   #12
newbiesforever
Senior Member
 
Registered: Apr 2006
Location: Glendale, AZ
Distribution: Distro-homeless. Lost.
Posts: 1,878

Original Poster
Rep: Reputation: 62
Quote:
Originally Posted by MTK358 View Post
I am not sure what the relationship between Chromium and Google Chrome is.
I'd never heard of Chromium.
 
Old 05-22-2010, 02:04 PM   #13
damgar
Senior Member
 
Registered: Sep 2009
Location: dallas, tx
Distribution: Slackware - current multilib/gsb Arch
Posts: 1,949
Blog Entries: 8

Rep: Reputation: 201Reputation: 201Reputation: 201
Chromium is chrome without the google branding.
 
Old 05-22-2010, 02:10 PM   #14
newbiesforever
Senior Member
 
Registered: Apr 2006
Location: Glendale, AZ
Distribution: Distro-homeless. Lost.
Posts: 1,878

Original Poster
Rep: Reputation: 62
Quote:
Originally Posted by damgar View Post
Chromium is chrome without the google branding.
Oh. Like Iceweasel is Firefox without the Mozilla branding (if I recall, not being an Iceweasel user)?
 
Old 05-22-2010, 02:14 PM   #15
damgar
Senior Member
 
Registered: Sep 2009
Location: dallas, tx
Distribution: Slackware - current multilib/gsb Arch
Posts: 1,949
Blog Entries: 8

Rep: Reputation: 201Reputation: 201Reputation: 201
From http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Google_Chrome

Quote:
Google Chrome is a web browser developed by Google that uses the WebKit layout engine and application framework. It was first released as a beta version for Microsoft Windows on 2 September 2008, and the public stable release was on 11 December 2008. The name is derived from the graphical user interface frame, or "chrome", of web browsers. As of April 2010, Chrome was the third most widely used browser, with 6.73% of worldwide usage share of web browsers, according to Net Applications.[2]
In September 2008, Google released a large portion of Chrome's source code, including its V8 JavaScript engine, as an open source project entitled Chromium.[3][4] This move enabled third-party developers to study the underlying source code and help port the browser to Mac OS X and Linux. A Google spokesperson also expressed hope that other browsers would adopt V8 to help web applications.[5] The Google-authored portion of Chromium is released under the permissive BSD license,[6] which allows portions to be incorporated into both open source and closed-source software programs.[7] Other portions of the source code are subject to a variety of open-source licenses.[8] Chromium implements the same feature set as Chrome, but lacks built in automatic updates and Google branding, most notably it has a blue-colored logo in place of the multicolored Google logo.[9]
 
  


Reply


Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
LXer: Google Chrome Automatically Installs Google Repository in Ubuntu LXer Syndicated Linux News 3 05-07-2010 12:20 PM
Google Chrome khaledaljabry Linux - Newbie 3 05-05-2010 10:20 AM
Google Chrome Review dudeman41465 Linux - Software 2 03-27-2010 10:56 AM
Google Chrome raysr Suse/Novell 1 02-17-2010 11:03 PM
LXer: Google's Chrome ready to shine? LXer Syndicated Linux News 0 11-27-2009 04:11 PM


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 05:51 PM.

Main Menu
My LQ
Write for LQ
LinuxQuestions.org is looking for people interested in writing Editorials, Articles, Reviews, and more. If you'd like to contribute content, let us know.
Main Menu
Syndicate
RSS1  Latest Threads
RSS1  LQ News
Twitter: @linuxquestions
identi.ca: @linuxquestions
Facebook: linuxquestions Google+: linuxquestions
Open Source Consulting | Domain Registration