Linux - SoftwareThis forum is for Software issues.
Having a problem installing a new program? Want to know which application is best for the job? Post your question in this forum.
Notices
Welcome to LinuxQuestions.org, a friendly and active Linux Community.
You are currently viewing LQ as a guest. By joining our community you will have the ability to post topics, receive our newsletter, use the advanced search, subscribe to threads and access many other special features. Registration is quick, simple and absolutely free. Join our community today!
Note that registered members see fewer ads, and ContentLink is completely disabled once you log in.
If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us. If you need to reset your password, click here.
Having a problem logging in? Please visit this page to clear all LQ-related cookies.
Get a virtual cloud desktop with the Linux distro that you want in less than five minutes with Shells! With over 10 pre-installed distros to choose from, the worry-free installation life is here! Whether you are a digital nomad or just looking for flexibility, Shells can put your Linux machine on the device that you want to use.
Exclusive for LQ members, get up to 45% off per month. Click here for more info.
well that's asking for glibc 2.8, what version do you heave installed? Having that sort of error, I'd wonder if you are actually running fc10 in the first place, but you've kindly neglected to tell us what distro you're running to confirm that either way. if you anre't on fc10 then you should get an RPM for your own distro specifically.
This is really meant to be a general installation question and I don't necessarily want help in installing this specific RPM on this specific machine.
Quote:
well that's asking for glibc 2.8, what version do you heave installed?
That's probably my source of confusion. I had assumed that when libraries are named libXXXX.so.NN, where NN is a number, that that number is the version, and that's what determines if it's compatible or whatever. Isn't that generally true of all libraries?
Are you saying that it's possible to have two different libraries named libc.so.6 and each a different version? If so, how can I tell which version my libc.so.6, and in general, which version any library is? How did rpm know that the libc.so.6 that was currently installed wasn't the correct version?
ultimately in this *specific* case you can run "strings /lib/libc.so.6" and it will, or won't, list GLIBC2.8 in the output. You're going about this the wrong way though, get the right package in the first place (you still haven't mentioned what distro you are on), or build from source to make the code take whatever is already there without issue.
You are correct in that this rpm file is the wrong one for the machine I'm on. I'm on a CentOS 5.x machine, while the rpm file was for a Fedora Core machine. What could I do? There's no equivalent rpm for a CentOS Distro.
I think what John VV said about Fedora also applies to you using CentOS.
Use yum to install software.
I first tried "yum list | grep -i vpn" and that turned up nothing. So I had to "leave the Reservation". But this thread is really more about resolving library dependencies then it is about installing a VPN client.
I've got a feeling that cmd defaults to checking installed pkgs. You'll need the list available option.
There's a good list of cmds/options here: http://kbase.redhat.com/faq/docs/DOC-2531
I first tried "yum list | grep -i vpn" and that turned up nothing.
Quote:
Originally Posted by unSpawn
The RPMForge repo has a Centos Vpnc package.
Quote:
But this thread is really more about resolving library dependencies ...
I think it is more about how rpm works and how it determines, if a package will be fitting into your setup.
The fedora package might even work when you force install it - but rpm of course sees some unmet dependencies and refuses to install.
But this thread is really more about resolving library dependencies then it is about installing a VPN client.
Not really, it appears to be about understand which RPM's are and are not applicable for a given system. Don't try to make a square peg fit a round hole. I'll only go off on pointless tangents about chisels and wood shavings...
LinuxQuestions.org is looking for people interested in writing
Editorials, Articles, Reviews, and more. If you'd like to contribute
content, let us know.