LinuxQuestions.org
Support LQ: Use code LQ3 and save $3 on Domain Registration
Go Back   LinuxQuestions.org > Forums > Linux Forums > Linux - Software
User Name
Password
Linux - Software This forum is for Software issues.
Having a problem installing a new program? Want to know which application is best for the job? Post your question in this forum.

Notices

Reply
 
Search this Thread
Old 06-14-2006, 02:50 PM   #1
jnusbaum
LQ Newbie
 
Registered: Feb 2002
Posts: 3

Rep: Reputation: 0
gcc 4.1.1


Does anyone have a build of gcc 4.1.1 for RedHat EL 4 64bit SMP? I have been unable to build it from source. I get an internal linker error trying to build libstdc++. I have upgraded to the latest binutils, etc. I can't find a binary rpm for gcc 4.1.1 anywhere but I know it is available in Fedora Core 5.
 
Old 06-14-2006, 07:20 PM   #2
cs-cam
Senior Member
 
Registered: May 2004
Location: Australia
Distribution: Gentoo
Posts: 3,544
Blog Entries: 4

Rep: Reputation: 56
Why such bleeding edge software on a server machine? That would be why you can't find it anywhere, Redhat will stick with the "tried and true" stuff for their enterprise-level operating systems.
 
Old 06-15-2006, 11:11 AM   #3
jnusbaum
LQ Newbie
 
Registered: Feb 2002
Posts: 3

Original Poster
Rep: Reputation: 0
Well because my target OS is dictated by the customer and my software requires implementation of certain C++ language constructs that are not handled correctly by any gcc release except 4.1.1. This is one area where I think RedHat makes a big mistake. It is fine to avoid bleeding edge releases for core things like the kernel, filesystem, etc. But development tools are NOT part of the core of a server system. It is perfectly acceptable for development tools to be bleeding edge (as long as the stable versions are also available) and sophisticated software development often needs bleeding edge tools. Especially C++ development given the complexity of the language and the attendent compiler technology needed.
 
Old 06-15-2006, 11:22 AM   #4
fedora4002
Member
 
Registered: Mar 2004
Posts: 135

Rep: Reputation: 15
GCC 4.x sucks. It did a poor job for back compatibility. Lots of packages that has no problem with GCC 3.x can not be compiled using GCC 4.x. You might need to install both versions.
 
  


Reply

Tags
gcc


Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
LXer: Tools: GCC 3.4.6, Final GCC 3 Release LXer Syndicated Linux News 0 05-30-2006 02:21 AM
gcc wont install, 'failed dependencies: glibc-devel is needed by gcc-3.3.3-41' TdlSnare Suse/Novell 3 11-29-2004 02:13 PM
running software built with gcc 3.0.2 on Redhat 8 - gcc 3.2 dst1989 Linux - Software 3 03-08-2004 10:23 PM
a doubt with host gcc and arm-linux-gcc renjithgopal Linux - General 1 09-11-2003 04:02 PM
export CC=/usr/bin/gcc-3.2 - switch gcc version? ferreter Linux - Software 1 08-20-2003 12:07 AM


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 01:02 AM.

Main Menu
My LQ
Write for LQ
LinuxQuestions.org is looking for people interested in writing Editorials, Articles, Reviews, and more. If you'd like to contribute content, let us know.
Main Menu
Syndicate
RSS1  Latest Threads
RSS1  LQ News
Twitter: @linuxquestions
identi.ca: @linuxquestions
Facebook: linuxquestions Google+: linuxquestions
Open Source Consulting | Domain Registration