Linux - Software This forum is for Software issues.
Having a problem installing a new program? Want to know which application is best for the job? Post your question in this forum. |
| Notices |
Welcome to LinuxQuestions.org, a friendly and active Linux Community.
You are currently viewing LQ as a guest. By joining our community you will have the ability to post topics, receive our newsletter, use the advanced search, subscribe to threads and access many other special features. Registration is quick, simple and absolutely free. Join our community today!
Note that registered members see fewer ads, and ContentLink is completely disabled once you log in.
Are you new to LinuxQuestions.org? Visit the following links:
Site Howto |
Site FAQ |
Sitemap |
Register Now
If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us. If you need to reset your password, click here.
Having a problem logging in? Please visit this page to clear all LQ-related cookies.
 |
GNU/Linux Basic Guide
This 255-page guide will provide you with the keys to understand the philosophy of free software, teach you how to use and handle it, and give you the tools required to move easily in the world of GNU/Linux. Many users and administrators will be taking their first steps with this GNU/Linux Basic guide and it will show you how to approach and solve the problems you encounter.
Click Here to receive this Complete Guide absolutely free. |
|
 |
03-17-2005, 04:52 AM
|
#1
|
|
Member
Registered: Oct 2004
Location: /usr/home
Distribution: Fedora, Mint, FreeBSD, Android
Posts: 337
Rep:
|
Firefox 1.0.1 and Java 1.5 plugin: no go
The Java 1.5 plugin worked fine with version v1.0 of Firefox. However, the new Firefox v1.0.1 crashes when I create a symbolic link to /usr/java/jre1.5.0/plugin/i386/ns7-gcc29/libjavaplugin_oji.so
in either /usr/lib/mozilla/plugins/ or ~/.mozilla/plugins.
Anyone else encountered this problem? Any workarounds for it?
I am running Fedora Core 3 with kernel 2.6.10-1.770.
Last edited by Kropotkin; 03-17-2005 at 04:54 AM.
|
|
|
|
03-17-2005, 05:40 AM
|
#2
|
|
Member
Registered: Mar 2004
Location: UK/West Yorkshire/Huddersfield
Distribution: Fedora 7
Posts: 982
Rep:
|
Reboot that sucker and see how you go. I had the same problem.
/usr/java/jre1.5.0/plugin/i386/ns7-gcc29/libjavaplugin_oji.so
change this to
/usr/java/jre1.5.0/plugin/i386/ns7/libjavaplugin_oji.so
yeah baby.
Regards
Chris
|
|
|
|
03-17-2005, 12:10 PM
|
#3
|
|
Member
Registered: Oct 2004
Location: /usr/home
Distribution: Fedora, Mint, FreeBSD, Android
Posts: 337
Original Poster
Rep:
|
Quote:
Originally posted by snecklifter
/usr/java/jre1.5.0/plugin/i386/ns7-gcc29/libjavaplugin_oji.so
change this to
/usr/java/jre1.5.0/plugin/i386/ns7/libjavaplugin_oji.so
|
Thanks, that fixed it.
|
|
|
|
03-17-2005, 12:22 PM
|
#4
|
|
Member
Registered: Mar 2005
Location: Ice Station Alert AFB
Distribution: Gentoo
Posts: 166
Rep:
|
I also would like Java....
Could either of you flesh out the steps between "download 1.5"...
including how to symbolically 'link' the file?
I am only an egg.
|
|
|
|
03-17-2005, 12:45 PM
|
#5
|
|
Senior Member
Registered: Feb 2004
Location: Somerset, England
Distribution: Slackware 10.2, Slackware 10.0, Ubuntu 9.10
Posts: 1,938
Rep:
|
Re: I also would like Java....
Quote:
Originally posted by penguinlnx
Could either of you flesh out the steps between "download 1.5"...
including how to symbolically 'link' the file?
I am only an egg.
|
To symbolically link (like a windows shortcut only more powerful):
Code:
ln -s <original file> <link directory>
i.e.
ln -s /usr/java/jre1.5.0/plugin/i386/ns7/libjavaplugin_oji.so /usr/lib/mozilla/plugins
will create a symbolic link from the first file in the directory /usr/lib/mozilla/plugins.
If you're using firefox and it puts itself in /usr/local/firefox then just change the second bit accordingly. This is most likely the case if you installed firefox from a tarball and put it somewhere non-standard (but frankly more sensible)
By the way, just about everything has a manual page. Type man <command> to get the page up. q to quit. e.g. man ln will give you the man page for the ln command.
|
|
|
|
03-19-2005, 02:37 AM
|
#6
|
|
Member
Registered: Mar 2005
Location: Ice Station Alert AFB
Distribution: Gentoo
Posts: 166
Rep:
|
First let me apologize for my ignorance...
Okay: "man ln" does indeed give a terse and no doubt accurate description of parameters and actions for the Linux command, 'ln'.
...which sadly is meaningless to me even though I am an experienced MASM and TurboPascal programmer. Perhaps you could recommend a friendly tutorial on the *PURPOSE* and uses of the 'ln' command as opposed to the syntax.
It sure sounded like it could be part of a series of steps for creating a 'launcher' in Linuxese, which they tell me is some kind of equivalent to a pointer to an .exe file in Windows. (I hate to keep using Windows as a translating language, but what can I do?)
"Lemme esplain - no there isn't time: lemme sum up:"
>>"like a windows shortcut only more powerful" (quite the teaser but leaves me in the dark)
>> "creates a symbolic link to the 1st file in the folder..."
(a frightening thought! How could such a random act luck out and be useful?
Wouldn't you want to somehow control what file was the target of a 'link' whatever a link is?
I know this completely betrays my ignorance of Linux thinking, but can you not pity one
who is used to 'right-clicking' on an .exe file and getting a movable 'pointer' to it instantly?)
"...are there no workhouses? Are there no prisons?" - Msr Scrooge...
|
|
|
|
03-19-2005, 09:06 AM
|
#7
|
|
Senior Member
Registered: Feb 2004
Location: Somerset, England
Distribution: Slackware 10.2, Slackware 10.0, Ubuntu 9.10
Posts: 1,938
Rep:
|
Re: First let me apologize for my ignorance...
Quote:
Originally posted by penguinlnx
Okay: "man ln" does indeed give a terse and no doubt accurate description of parameters and actions for the Linux command, 'ln'.
...which sadly is meaningless to me even though I am an experienced MASM and TurboPascal programmer. Perhaps you could recommend a friendly tutorial on the *PURPOSE* and uses of the 'ln' command as opposed to the syntax.
It sure sounded like it could be part of a series of steps for creating a 'launcher' in Linuxese, which they tell me is some kind of equivalent to a pointer to an .exe file in Windows. (I hate to keep using Windows as a translating language, but what can I do?)
"Lemme esplain - no there isn't time: lemme sum up:"
>>"like a windows shortcut only more powerful" (quite the teaser but leaves me in the dark)
>> "creates a symbolic link to the 1st file in the folder..."
(a frightening thought! How could such a random act luck out and be useful?
Wouldn't you want to somehow control what file was the target of a 'link' whatever a link is?
I know this completely betrays my ignorance of Linux thinking, but can you not pity one
who is used to 'right-clicking' on an .exe file and getting a movable 'pointer' to it instantly?)
"...are there no workhouses? Are there no prisons?" - Msr Scrooge...
|
Sorry, by "Creates a link to the first file in the folder" I didn't mean the file that appears first, I meant the file I had already referred to in the post.
Code:
ln -s /usr/java/jre1.5.0/plugin/i386/ns7/libjavaplugin_oji.so /usr/lib/mozilla/plugins
Put a different way, the command above creates a symbolic link (without the -s it would make a hard link) from the first file (libjavaplugin_oji.so) in the folder /usr/lib/mozilla/plugins. If you want you could specify the name of the link if you changed that last parameter to /usr/lib/mozilla/plugins/newlinkname.so
For a summary of linking:
http://burks.bton.ac.uk/burks/linux/rute/node15.htm
|
|
|
|
03-19-2005, 11:04 AM
|
#8
|
|
Member
Registered: Nov 2004
Location: Torreón, Coahuila, México
Distribution: Gentoo
Posts: 342
Rep:
|
Im puzzled. This thread is about Firefox 1.0.1 or Mozilla? Cause most (all I think) answers are for Mozilla.
The problem with Firefox 1.0.1 and Java 1.5 should be fixed by doing this:
Code:
ln -s /usr/java/jre1.5.0/plugin/i386/ns7/libjavaplugin_oji.so /usr/lib/firefox-1.0.1/plugins
Then again if any of the previously posted replies helped maybe you are using Mozilla and not Firefox 1.0.1
Just trying to clarify this a bit.
|
|
|
|
03-19-2005, 01:01 PM
|
#9
|
|
Senior Member
Registered: Feb 2004
Location: Somerset, England
Distribution: Slackware 10.2, Slackware 10.0, Ubuntu 9.10
Posts: 1,938
Rep:
|
Quote:
Originally posted by mebrelith
Im puzzled. This thread is about Firefox 1.0.1 or Mozilla? Cause most (all I think) answers are for Mozilla.
The problem with Firefox 1.0.1 and Java 1.5 should be fixed by doing this:
Code:
ln -s /usr/java/jre1.5.0/plugin/i386/ns7/libjavaplugin_oji.so /usr/lib/firefox-1.0.1/plugins
Then again if any of the previously posted replies helped maybe you are using Mozilla and not Firefox 1.0.1
Just trying to clarify this a bit.
|
This is the solution already posted, bar the change of directory which I've alluded to earlier anyway. Depending on how you install firefox, you will get a different install directory. The default seems to be /usr/lib/firefox-1.0 or similar, but to me /usr/lib seems like a stupid prefix for installing a program, therefore mine is installed in /usr/local/firefox and my Mom's is /opt/firefox
The answers above were more about linking as that's what was asked for by one of the later posters.
|
|
|
|
| Thread Tools |
Search this Thread |
|
|
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
All times are GMT -5. The time now is 08:39 AM.
|
|
LinuxQuestions.org is looking for people interested in writing
Editorials, Articles, Reviews, and more. If you'd like to contribute
content, let us know.
|
Latest Threads
LQ News
|
|