LinuxQuestions.org
Support LQ: Use code LQ3 and save $3 on Domain Registration
Go Back   LinuxQuestions.org > Forums > Linux Forums > Linux - Software
User Name
Password
Linux - Software This forum is for Software issues.
Having a problem installing a new program? Want to know which application is best for the job? Post your question in this forum.

Notices



Reply
 
Search this Thread
Old 11-30-2003, 06:03 PM   #1
downinthemine
Member
 
Registered: Jul 2003
Location: Silver Spring, MD
Distribution: Xubuntu
Posts: 167

Rep: Reputation: 30
Firebird/Thunderbird v. Mozilla


I am getting ready to switch from Mandrake to Slackware 9.1 and I am generally reconsidering which apps I use. Right now I am using Thunderbird and Firebird. My question is are there any benefits to using Mozilla for mail and browsing as opposed to the two programs separately?
 
Old 11-30-2003, 07:05 PM   #2
slakmagik
Senior Member
 
Registered: Feb 2003
Distribution: Slackware
Posts: 4,113

Rep: Reputation: Disabled
Mozilla is better. Period.

You can also open your mail notification from LQ, click on the link, and the page loads up in your browser. Not sure if it works that way in general. Fewer clicks - your mail is right there. Don't need a newsreader, as mozilla does that, too. Etc.

Plus, Firebird is too damn much like IE. Mozilla's more like Netscape done right. You *can't* do IE right.
 
Old 12-01-2003, 06:13 PM   #3
Santas
Member
 
Registered: Jun 2003
Location: Over the rainbow
Distribution: Mandrake 10 / Guadalinex
Posts: 290

Rep: Reputation: 30
well, i prefer firebird and thunderbird than mozilla i think that firebird is faster than mozilla and thunderbird is easier to use. and if you only use firebird or thunderbird, or you find a better program you don't need to install the other.
 
Old 12-01-2003, 07:46 PM   #4
sandman
Member
 
Registered: Sep 2002
Distribution: arch
Posts: 232

Rep: Reputation: 30
I prefer Firebird and Thunderbird myself. Besides, isn't Mozilla going to eventually be Firebird later on? Mozilla is probably a little more stable than Firebird but hey, it's been around a little longer. I just like Firebird myself because it seems faster, and is more customizable for my taste. I think really that it depends on the user and his preferences.
 
Old 12-02-2003, 02:46 AM   #5
Hendikins
LQ Newbie
 
Registered: Nov 2003
Location: All stations to Zig Zag via the North Shore Line
Distribution: SuSE 9.0
Posts: 13

Rep: Reputation: 0
Quote:
Originally posted by digiot
You can also open your mail notification from LQ, click on the link, and the page loads up in your browser.
Just FYI, this is working with recent trunk builds of Thunderbird, although the MozEx extension is still required to open mailto: links with Firebird.
 
  


Reply


Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Mozilla, firebird, and thunderbird are... HUGE! IcoNyx Suse/Novell 8 06-23-2005 01:49 PM
Segfaults in Mozilla, Mozilla Firebird, and Mozilla Thunderbird Ninja Cow Linux - Software 2 02-02-2004 02:33 AM
firebird and thunderbird don't mix? jaan kaer Linux - Newbie 2 11-23-2003 03:45 PM
Firebird/Thunderbird clash guygriffiths Linux - Software 1 10-24-2003 09:11 AM
firebird & thunderbird Nechos Linux - Software 15 09-27-2003 07:15 PM


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 02:44 AM.

Main Menu
Advertisement
My LQ
Write for LQ
LinuxQuestions.org is looking for people interested in writing Editorials, Articles, Reviews, and more. If you'd like to contribute content, let us know.
Main Menu
Syndicate
RSS1  Latest Threads
RSS1  LQ News
Twitter: @linuxquestions
identi.ca: @linuxquestions
Facebook: linuxquestions Google+: linuxquestions
Open Source Consulting | Domain Registration