Linux - SoftwareThis forum is for Software issues.
Having a problem installing a new program? Want to know which application is best for the job? Post your question in this forum.
Notices
Welcome to LinuxQuestions.org, a friendly and active Linux Community.
You are currently viewing LQ as a guest. By joining our community you will have the ability to post topics, receive our newsletter, use the advanced search, subscribe to threads and access many other special features. Registration is quick, simple and absolutely free. Join our community today!
Note that registered members see fewer ads, and ContentLink is completely disabled once you log in.
If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us. If you need to reset your password, click here.
Having a problem logging in? Please visit this page to clear all LQ-related cookies.
Get a virtual cloud desktop with the Linux distro that you want in less than five minutes with Shells! With over 10 pre-installed distros to choose from, the worry-free installation life is here! Whether you are a digital nomad or just looking for flexibility, Shells can put your Linux machine on the device that you want to use.
Exclusive for LQ members, get up to 45% off per month. Click here for more info.
All I've managed to find so far is a live CD ISO, but I've read you can install from that. Most mirrors I've looked at (such as this one) have the live ISO for download. Edit: you can also download the DVD ISO and install from your hard disk as detailed here.
All I've managed to find so far is a live CD ISO, but I've read you can install from that. Most mirrors I've looked at (such as this one) have the live ISO for download.
The LiveCD install is faster and less error-prone, since all it does is transfer the image to the hard drive and run firstboot, instead of installing all the packages, checking dependencies, etc.
The LiveCD install is faster and less error-prone, since all it does is transfer the image to the hard drive and run firstboot, instead of installing all the packages, checking dependencies, etc.
are you being sarcastic?
Livecd installs are slower, because you are running a whole desktop enivronment usually and because the person using it is usually running stuff when you install it. the Livecd installer works the exact same as a normal installer except without running a whole operating system. In short, livecd installs are the worst
Can you still get the ISO images for an install CD for Fedora Core 7?? I need the install CD, not DVD.
well live install is ok I would go knoppix but with the dvd with full sourc. if you cant use a dvd then pclinux live cd in nice but you better have a fas internet connection you wil spend a few hours updating the distro. if you only have dial up then it will take about two weeks to do the up date that is the same with all the big boys live distro's.
No the Fedora 7 (and later) live CD install are not the same as the old CD install. It is faster because it only installs one CD. Then when you do your first yum update you only download a minimum of packages. You do not install (much) software from the CD (it is not there) but from yum. That way you are not downloading obsolete (stuff on the DVD) versions. Two months after a version of Fedora has been released there are a ton of updates, so it is really significant.
No the Fedora 7 (and later) live CD install are not the same as the old CD install. It is faster because it only installs one CD. Then when you do your first yum update you only download a minimum of packages. You do not install (much) software from the CD (it is not there) but from yum. That way you are not downloading obsolete (stuff on the DVD) versions. Two months after a version of Fedora has been released there are a ton of updates, so it is really significant.
Lazlow
I meant the same process, the livecd would be slower because you are running alot more then a normal install disc
Well, that would depend on your RAM. The live CD takes roughly 30 sec. to boot up and maybe 5 min to install on my box, but I have 2GB of RAM. I just tested it on an old Compaq with 256MB of RAM (about the minimum) and it takes ages. It won't even load the installer completely without manually setting up a swap file using dd, mkswap and swapon.
LinuxQuestions.org is looking for people interested in writing
Editorials, Articles, Reviews, and more. If you'd like to contribute
content, let us know.