Linux - SoftwareThis forum is for Software issues.
Having a problem installing a new program? Want to know which application is best for the job? Post your question in this forum.
Notices
Welcome to LinuxQuestions.org, a friendly and active Linux Community.
You are currently viewing LQ as a guest. By joining our community you will have the ability to post topics, receive our newsletter, use the advanced search, subscribe to threads and access many other special features. Registration is quick, simple and absolutely free. Join our community today!
Note that registered members see fewer ads, and ContentLink is completely disabled once you log in.
If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us. If you need to reset your password, click here.
Having a problem logging in? Please visit this page to clear all LQ-related cookies.
Get a virtual cloud desktop with the Linux distro that you want in less than five minutes with Shells! With over 10 pre-installed distros to choose from, the worry-free installation life is here! Whether you are a digital nomad or just looking for flexibility, Shells can put your Linux machine on the device that you want to use.
Exclusive for LQ members, get up to 45% off per month. Click here for more info.
Does anyone know of a linux e-mail client that automatically compresses the message base?
I've tried most of the linux e-mail clients that I could find, and all of them eventually start loading very slowly because my message database gets so large. I don't like to delete messages (except stuff that's clearly junk), so I guess I need an e-mail client that will automatically compress the message base.
Mutt can do this with folder hooks. I've this configured using gzip and bzip2 in my other machine, which isn't working right now. I could try to get that HD mounted here, only if you can't find this trick anyehre else.
I must be pretty dense myself. I looked under the File menu for both KMail and Thunderbird, and both have a "compact folders" option. I'll see if this makes any difference.
I just use IMAP to access my mail on a local server, no need to have any client worry about maintaining a local database. Most will do header caching to speed things up, but I've never seen that affect their performance much.
LinuxQuestions.org is looking for people interested in writing
Editorials, Articles, Reviews, and more. If you'd like to contribute
content, let us know.