Linux - SoftwareThis forum is for Software issues.
Having a problem installing a new program? Want to know which application is best for the job? Post your question in this forum.
Welcome to LinuxQuestions.org, a friendly and active Linux Community.
You are currently viewing LQ as a guest. By joining our community you will have the ability to post topics, receive our newsletter, use the advanced search, subscribe to threads and access many other special features. Registration is quick, simple and absolutely free. Join our community today!
Note that registered members see fewer ads, and ContentLink is completely disabled once you log in.
If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us. If you need to reset your password, click here.
Having a problem logging in? Please visit this page to clear all LQ-related cookies.
Introduction to Linux - A Hands on Guide
This guide was created as an overview of the Linux Operating System, geared toward new users as an exploration tour and getting started guide, with exercises at the end of each chapter.
For more advanced trainees it can be a desktop reference, and a collection of the base knowledge needed to proceed with system and network administration. This book contains many real life examples derived from the author's experience as a Linux system and network administrator, trainer and consultant. They hope these examples will help you to get a better understanding of the Linux system and that you feel encouraged to try out things on your own.
Click Here to receive this Complete Guide absolutely free.
I had a system set up to dual boot WinXP and Fedora as per the instructions that can be found here (install bootloader on root partition, add bootsect.lnx to boot.ini). All was well, until I installed the Vista beta, which apparently uses a new bootloader to boot. Not sure what to do at this point. I thought all that would happen is I would boot with another option on the NT bootloader, but since Vista uses a new one, that wasn't the case, and for a while it wasn't booting anything else. I had to clear the partition it was installed on, run fixmbr and fixboot to get the bootloader to see the XP install, and now that boots fine (I'm writing this from the XP install).
Now the real problem is that I can't get Linux to boot, even after retracing the steps I took when I first installed it. I used the dd if=/dev/sda1 of=/mnt/floppy/bootsect.lnx bs=512 count=1 to get the boot sector onto a floppy which I then copied into the C:\ drive and properly adjusted the boot.ini file again, and what I get when I select Linux is "GRUB_"
It seems it's showing the bootloader but the bootloader doesn't know what to do. I then tried updating the bootloader with the Fedora CD's, and after that I redid the whole dd if= deal again to use what should be the updated bootloader. Still the same GRUB_ line, and it does nothing and responds only to me hitting the power button.
I've gone through everything I can think of, anybody else have any ideas?
Other information that might be relevant: Fedora is installed on one sata drive, and windows is installed on another. I have a large ide drive I use for storage that got named C:\ by default, so the Windows bootloader is on there. It shouldn't matter, and it didn't in the past, but who knows now.
"I had a system set up to dual boot WinXP and Fedora as per the instructions that can be found here (install bootloader on root partition, add bootsect.lnx to boot.ini). All was well, until I installed the Vista beta, which apparently uses a new bootloader to boot."
Since you are running Windows Vista beta you obviously have access to the heightened support that Microsoft should be extending to the beta testers. You should get Microsoft to fix the problem keeping in mind Microsoft's new policy of playing nice with the other operating systems that a customer has installed.