Linux - Software This forum is for Software issues.
Having a problem installing a new program? Want to know which application is best for the job? Post your question in this forum. |
| Notices |
Welcome to LinuxQuestions.org, a friendly and active Linux Community.
You are currently viewing LQ as a guest. By joining our community you will have the ability to post topics, receive our newsletter, use the advanced search, subscribe to threads and access many other special features. Registration is quick, simple and absolutely free. Join our community today!
Note that registered members see fewer ads, and ContentLink is completely disabled once you log in.
Are you new to LinuxQuestions.org? Visit the following links:
Site Howto |
Site FAQ |
Sitemap |
Register Now
If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us. If you need to reset your password, click here.
Having a problem logging in? Please visit this page to clear all LQ-related cookies.
 |
GNU/Linux Basic Guide
This 255-page guide will provide you with the keys to understand the philosophy of free software, teach you how to use and handle it, and give you the tools required to move easily in the world of GNU/Linux. Many users and administrators will be taking their first steps with this GNU/Linux Basic guide and it will show you how to approach and solve the problems you encounter.
Click Here to receive this Complete Guide absolutely free. |
|
 |
08-26-2010, 01:07 AM
|
#1
|
|
Senior Member
Registered: May 2007
Distribution: RHEL, CentOS
Posts: 1,231
Rep:
|
Disk Imaging for Unix (Linux) Systems
Dear All,
I am new to imaging (or cloning) of Unix Disks.
I just wanted to know which Imaging Software is best to use in terms of easiness, reliability and some support (HowTOs, Forums, etc) .
I googled out and found these :-
1) Clonezilla
2) Partimage
3) Gparted
Based on your valuable suggestions, I will learn any of these on my test servers. And then, I will suggest it to be used in my organization.
|
|
|
|
08-26-2010, 01:36 AM
|
#2
|
|
Member
Registered: Jul 2003
Location: Brighton, Michigan, USA
Distribution: Lots of distros in the past, now Linux Mint
Posts: 746
Rep:
|
Depends on your needs. You can always dd your partition/disk and pipe it through tar and a compressor, if all you need is to archive it onto another medium for off-site storage/retrieval. rsync is another (more?) popular option, allowing incremental backups and some networking capability.
Those are probably the easiest and most well-documented options, but there are plenty of other options, mostly adding more features, such as integrated networking options (vpn and so on), "easy to use" GUIs, and various verification, duplication, and encryption schemes, and possibly boot/restoration capabilities.
Almost all of which can be done via command line, if you google a bit and don't mind reading a little. So it might be better not to think in terms of "best", but more in terms of what's most comfortable for you to use...as the underlying actions are all pretty much the same, from a command-line perspective.
Oh, and perhaps I'm wrong, but gparted is more a partitioning program, not so much a backup solution for regular use. Also, it's important to keep in mind that there have been A LOT of disk imaging solutions for Linux, but most barely last a few years before they become unmaintained, so you're going to want something with a robust history and a strong community.
Last edited by scott_R; 08-26-2010 at 01:39 AM.
|
|
|
|
08-26-2010, 01:52 AM
|
#3
|
|
Member
Registered: Aug 2003
Location: Salzburg, Austria
Distribution: Ubuntu, CentOS, FreeBSD
Posts: 34
Rep:
|
I can tell you from my experience that I have used Clonezilla extensively with various linux distros, as well as with various editions of Windows workstations, and it has always worked like a charm. That being said, it is text-based, but you will be guided through the process linearly, question by question, so if you don't mind reading the few questions asked carefully, i.e. what is your source drive, what is your target drive and such, it is a solid solution. I have used it to backup and restore to disks of equal size, as well as restore backed up disk images do larger drives (and adjust the partitions with gparted or similar later on). The only thing you cannot do is restore a disk image to the drive smaller than the original drive.
Apart from these one man band operations, it also allows you to setup a central server in your LAN which will hold the images for all your workstations (space providing), from which you can then restore, to which you can backup, and so on. It has some options which are even more advance, and a website which is rather friendly and useful, so you might take a look there.
|
|
|
|
08-26-2010, 11:59 AM
|
#4
|
|
Senior Member
Registered: May 2007
Distribution: RHEL, CentOS
Posts: 1,231
Original Poster
Rep:
|
Thanks Predrag, I am trying out Clonezilla.
It needs DRBL (Diskless Remote Boot in Linux) to be configured but RHEL 5.4 is NOT supported by DRBL
Code:
[root@ser ~]# /opt/drbl/sbin/drblsrv -i
*****************************************************.
Hint! When a "yes or no" option is available, the default value is uppercase. E.g. (y/N) the default is "N", so when you press "Enter" without typing "Y or N" it will be as if you typed "N" and then "Enter". If you are not sure which option to choose just press "Enter" key.
*****************************************************.
*****************************************************.
Installing DRBL for RedHat/Fedora Linux...
This version is not supported: RH5.4
If you are sure this GNU/Linux distribution is compatible with those distributions which DRBL supports, you can try to use /opt/drbl/sbin/drblsrv-offline. For more details, check DRBL website or run "/opt/drbl/sbin/drblsrv-offline -h"
Press Ctrl-C to stop the program!!
Which distro were you using ? Any other idea ?
|
|
|
|
08-26-2010, 12:30 PM
|
#5
|
|
Member
Registered: Aug 2003
Location: Salzburg, Austria
Distribution: Ubuntu, CentOS, FreeBSD
Posts: 34
Rep:
|
I used it with Ubuntu.
That is weird though, because the website states:
DRBL provides a diskless or systemless environment for client machines. It works on Debian, Ubuntu, Mandriva, Red Hat, Fedora, CentOS and SuSE. DRBL uses distributed hardware resources and makes it possible for clients to fully access local hardware
Perhaps if you contacted them directly?
cheers
|
|
|
|
| Thread Tools |
Search this Thread |
|
|
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
All times are GMT -5. The time now is 07:32 AM.
|
|
LinuxQuestions.org is looking for people interested in writing
Editorials, Articles, Reviews, and more. If you'd like to contribute
content, let us know.
|
Latest Threads
LQ News
|
|