LinuxQuestions.org
Latest LQ Deal: Complete CCNA, CCNP & Red Hat Certification Training Bundle
Go Back   LinuxQuestions.org > Forums > Linux Forums > Linux - Software
User Name
Password
Linux - Software This forum is for Software issues.
Having a problem installing a new program? Want to know which application is best for the job? Post your question in this forum.

Notices


Reply
  Search this Thread
Old 02-21-2004, 02:25 PM   #1
dbc001
Member
 
Registered: Jan 2004
Distribution: Slackware, Ubuntu
Posts: 97

Rep: Reputation: 15
Compiled successfully - now what?


I've been compiling some software lately, and have finally gotten to the point where I understand enough of what's going on that programs are actually working. So my question is, once I've compiled and tested the software, where do I put it?

I've been extracting my software in /tmp . So I just downloaded and compiled Filelight, and it runs fine. But the actual program is in /tmp/filelight-0.6.4/src . Should I move the executable to /usr/bin ? Should I leave everything else in /tmp or should I move it elsewhere? Any help would be greatly appreciated!

-dbc
 
Old 02-21-2004, 02:50 PM   #2
Tinkster
Moderator
 
Registered: Apr 2002
Location: in a fallen world
Distribution: slackware by choice, others too :} ... android.
Posts: 23,066
Blog Entries: 11

Rep: Reputation: 910Reputation: 910Reputation: 910Reputation: 910Reputation: 910Reputation: 910Reputation: 910Reputation: 910
I'd suggest reading README and INSTALL.

Most program packages will tell you to run
a "make install" when it compiled & tested
fine ... no idea whether that's the same with
filelight... :}


Cheers,
Tink
 
Old 02-21-2004, 09:24 PM   #3
dbc001
Member
 
Registered: Jan 2004
Distribution: Slackware, Ubuntu
Posts: 97

Original Poster
Rep: Reputation: 15
so what should i do if there is no "make install"? where do most people put their apps? do I copy the whole folder, including the source? Does it matter? Seems like /usr/local/bin/appname is a good place for apps, any possible problems there?
 
Old 02-21-2004, 09:43 PM   #4
DrOzz
Senior Member
 
Registered: May 2003
Location: Sydney, Nova Scotia, Canada
Distribution: slackware
Posts: 4,185

Rep: Reputation: 59
well if the program is set to run immediately after uncompressing the tarball (ex, firefox, thunderbird, etc...) then just extract the folder wherever you want ... if you don't care that its in tmp, then so be it ...
it don't matter ... me personally when i get programs like that, i do extract them to /usr/local/bin ... but thats just me ... some just leave it in their home folder .. it don't matter ...
and like Tink said, read the README and INSTALL files ... they tell you typically steps for the software ...they will tell you if they require ./configure, make, make install, or whatever it may be ...
 
Old 02-21-2004, 11:06 PM   #5
comp12345
Member
 
Registered: Feb 2004
Posts: 467

Rep: Reputation: 30
Quote:
Originally posted by dbc001
so what should i do if there is no "make install"? where do most people put their apps? do I copy the whole folder, including the source? Does it matter? Seems like /usr/local/bin/appname is a good place for apps, any possible problems there?
You might want to try reading a post before replying. There is such a thing as a README file and an INSTALL file. It is included in the filelight sources. That seems to much for you to bother with, so I'll help you out.

Code:
Filelight Installation instructions
=========================

The configure script is provided (at some byte-cost!) so the procedure
should be as simple as:


./configure --prefix `kde-config --prefix`
make
su
make install
 
Old 02-22-2004, 11:04 AM   #6
dbc001
Member
 
Registered: Jan 2004
Distribution: Slackware, Ubuntu
Posts: 97

Original Poster
Rep: Reputation: 15
Thanks for your help

Thanks a lot for the help guys. Looks like I'll be putting apps in /usr/local/bin for the time being.

But I have to say that telling people to "look at README and INSTALL" really only needs to be said once per thread.

"You might want to try reading a post before replying."
This is just rude. You can tell that I read the README and INSTALL by this part:
"I just downloaded and compiled Filelight, and it runs fine."
How would someone compile and run a program if they didn't know to read the README and INSTALL files?

Lighten up, OK comp? You repeated what 2 other people said, except that they said it nicely, and you were a prick about it. Are you trying to help Linux or scare people away?

Anyway, thanks again for the help. Sorry about the rant!
 
  


Reply


Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off



Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
new kernel compiled successfully, but the kernel-source package is the same old? luqman Red Hat 2 03-03-2005 09:41 AM
Someone has successfully compiled X.org 6.8.2?? Shagrath239 Slackware 1 02-15-2005 11:54 PM
has anyone successfully compiled a kernel for a diff arch. other than i386? veritas Slackware 4 06-16-2004 06:19 PM
NE1 successfully compiled galeon cvs on FC2? gandalf2041 Fedora 0 05-20-2004 04:50 PM
how can i tell if my kernel has compiled successfully Goatdemon Linux - General 6 05-24-2002 02:08 AM


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 09:06 PM.

Main Menu
Advertisement
My LQ
Write for LQ
LinuxQuestions.org is looking for people interested in writing Editorials, Articles, Reviews, and more. If you'd like to contribute content, let us know.
Main Menu
Syndicate
RSS1  Latest Threads
RSS1  LQ News
Twitter: @linuxquestions
Facebook: linuxquestions Google+: linuxquestions
Open Source Consulting | Domain Registration