Linux - SoftwareThis forum is for Software issues.
Having a problem installing a new program? Want to know which application is best for the job? Post your question in this forum.
Notices
Welcome to LinuxQuestions.org, a friendly and active Linux Community.
You are currently viewing LQ as a guest. By joining our community you will have the ability to post topics, receive our newsletter, use the advanced search, subscribe to threads and access many other special features. Registration is quick, simple and absolutely free. Join our community today!
Note that registered members see fewer ads, and ContentLink is completely disabled once you log in.
If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us. If you need to reset your password, click here.
Having a problem logging in? Please visit this page to clear all LQ-related cookies.
Get a virtual cloud desktop with the Linux distro that you want in less than five minutes with Shells! With over 10 pre-installed distros to choose from, the worry-free installation life is here! Whether you are a digital nomad or just looking for flexibility, Shells can put your Linux machine on the device that you want to use.
Exclusive for LQ members, get up to 45% off per month. Click here for more info.
i'm going to be setting up a cluster at school and was wondering if anyone here has done this. as of now we have 12 10/100 network cards (i know, 100 is slow for this, but i did not pick them out) and 6 computers (p3 i think)
so who has done this? any tips? what is the best distro for clustering? and what programs do i need?
i was hoping to end up with a system that looks from a programs point of view as a computer with just 6 CPUs, is that possible or do i have to use special programs to distribute the load to the other programs and/or compile the program special for the cluster?
Remember, you are limited to 100Mbps throughput on the system. That is a huge bottleneck, so dont count on anything being like a computer with six CPU's.
Having them work back and forth as one main computer, would be a waste.
But having them all work together on one very large chunk of data, something like tens of gigabytes of video to encode would be easy.
The memory bus between my computers cpu and the ram is around 51000Mbps (DDR400). 100Mbps ethernet shared between 5 or 6 or 20 computers is a very small thing to be working with.
It really doesnt matter if you have 10Gbps ethernet, the computers really wont work well in a cluster on small bits of data. Ethernet is always going to be a bottleneck.
There is something out for apache, which seems fairly simple.
One master controller computer is hooked to the internet/network source, it acceps all the incoming connections, looks at the clustered apache comptuers, figures out which IP's go where to balance out the load, and thats about it.
as i see it now, its more so that we can say we have a cluster and that we made it, as i don't see any use for it either, so far we have decided that since the people who purchased the NICs thought that 12 100Mbps cards as one input and one output card per comp (what what were they thinking) would be best, but we have since decided that a master with 5 cards and 5 clients each with a card would be the best, that gives us 500Mbps each way from the master (100Mbps per comp), still slow, but not as bad
looking at the ClusterKnoppix link provided they mention blender3d, i may just end up benchmarking that.....and that distro does look good, i'm going to give it a test run
LinuxQuestions.org is looking for people interested in writing
Editorials, Articles, Reviews, and more. If you'd like to contribute
content, let us know.