LinuxQuestions.org
Support LQ: Use code LQ3 and save $3 on Domain Registration
Go Back   LinuxQuestions.org > Forums > Linux Forums > Linux - Software
User Name
Password
Linux - Software This forum is for Software issues.
Having a problem installing a new program? Want to know which application is best for the job? Post your question in this forum.

Notices

Reply
 
LinkBack Search this Thread
Old 07-07-2009, 08:26 AM   #1
Brad.Scalio@noaa.gov
Member
 
Registered: Jan 2007
Location: Washington DC
Distribution: RedHat & spins ... Fedora, CentOS, Mandriva
Posts: 82

Rep: Reputation: 15
Clustering & Fencing in GFS


Greetings

Exporting an iSCSI promoted LUN from a SUN ST5320 NAS to two servers, lets call them serv1 and serv2. Setup minimal RedHat Cluster Suite (via CentOS distro rpms) on the two nodes and can mount and manage the GFS via the clustering.

My problem is with fencing.

[1] What type of fencing should be implemented on a system that cannot have any addition hardware added We had DRAC4i cards, but the latest upgraded servers have them removed to save $$

[2] Is fencing as important for a simple GFS cluster

Anyone implemented similar topology have any suggestions?

Thanks
 
Old 07-08-2009, 04:09 AM   #2
unSpawn
Moderator
 
Registered: May 2001
Posts: 21,610
Blog Entries: 47

Rep: Reputation: 1413Reputation: 1413Reputation: 1413Reputation: 1413Reputation: 1413Reputation: 1413Reputation: 1413Reputation: 1413Reputation: 1413Reputation: 1413
I don't know zilch about GFS and fencing, but from reading the RHEL www.redhat.com/docs/manuals/csgfs/admin-guide/ docs and posts here on LQ I get that it is preferrable to have an uneven amount of physical nodes starting at three, and that if you have only two nodes you need to set up a quorum disk to ensure there will always be an uneven number of nodes available to decide which one to fence. Apparently fencing requires hardware. If no fending-capable hardware is available, the RHEL docs may suggest options. Maybe fence_gnbd? Most posts here suggest not to use fence_manual for production devices as it isn't doing any actual fencing, just printing messages humans sh|could react to (as in errare humanum est :-]). AFAIK running fenced is necesary for even simple GFS. For second opinions please check posts by brianmcgee and druuna and Jeremy's web log. These three I know to have shared GFS information on LQ.
 
  


Reply


Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are Off


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
GFS and Fencing akvino Linux - Enterprise 2 09-08-2008 04:48 PM
GFS and Clustering - general question akvino Linux - Enterprise 2 07-28-2008 08:56 AM
GFS ISCSI fencing ionic_slim Linux - Server 0 07-06-2008 07:44 AM
Can GFS used without clustering Guy Grenier Linux - Newbie 3 06-14-2008 03:29 AM
GFS & network bloc device cormanstnl Linux - Enterprise 3 07-21-2007 02:19 AM


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 12:33 PM.

Main Menu
 
My LQ
Write for LQ
LinuxQuestions.org is looking for people interested in writing Editorials, Articles, Reviews, and more. If you'd like to contribute content, let us know.
Main Menu
Syndicate
RSS1  Latest Threads
RSS1  LQ News
Twitter: @linuxquestions
identi.ca: @linuxquestions
Facebook: @linuxquestions
Open Source Consulting | Domain Registration