Bluefish or Screem?

d33pdream · 03-06-2003, 01:46 AM

What would you recommend?

acid_kewpie · 03-06-2003, 02:44 AM

bluefish personally, but why not just try them both?

macewan · 03-06-2003, 02:42 PM

bluefish seems more stable than screem. you may also want to check out quanta.

d33pdream · 03-06-2003, 04:58 PM

Im really really enjoying Bluefish

Trying to break the dreamweaver habbit.. grr

macewan · 03-06-2003, 07:20 PM

http://www.webpersonal.net/cestbibi/...amweaverMX.jpg

http://kafka.kde.org/screenshots.htm This project also looks promising. Wish it didn't depend on kde though.

wapcaplet · 03-06-2003, 07:47 PM

Vim

Crashed_Again · 03-06-2003, 09:25 PM

Bluefish. I just wanted to get rid of 666 posts. Whewww...

Tinkster · 03-06-2003, 09:37 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by macewan
This project also looks promising. Wish it didn't depend on kde though.

Heh ...

I just mailed the author of kmail a few days ago,
because I reall *love* kmail but find its memory
consumption a bit big, and get annoyed by the
fact that it pulls up the entire bloated kde-stuff
...
asked what he thinks about stripping it down to
simple qt ;)

Cheers,
Tink

trusktr · 02-23-2010, 02:21 AM

I'm reviving this old thread! hehe

Ok, so i tried Bluefish vs Screem

Bluefish is the winner! Simple, clean, power, and easy to use.

Screem was a little too complicated for my needs. Plus, i kinda don't like the name. I just needed a really good text editor.

Also, Bluefish launches faster than GEdit, although it has more features!