Linux - Software This forum is for Software issues.
Having a problem installing a new program? Want to know which application is best for the job? Post your question in this forum. |
| Notices |
Welcome to LinuxQuestions.org, a friendly and active Linux Community.
You are currently viewing LQ as a guest. By joining our community you will have the ability to post topics, receive our newsletter, use the advanced search, subscribe to threads and access many other special features. Registration is quick, simple and absolutely free. Join our community today!
Note that registered members see fewer ads, and ContentLink is completely disabled once you log in.
Are you new to LinuxQuestions.org? Visit the following links:
Site Howto |
Site FAQ |
Sitemap |
Register Now
If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us. If you need to reset your password, click here.
Having a problem logging in? Please visit this page to clear all LQ-related cookies.
 |
GNU/Linux Basic Guide
This 255-page guide will provide you with the keys to understand the philosophy of free software, teach you how to use and handle it, and give you the tools required to move easily in the world of GNU/Linux. Many users and administrators will be taking their first steps with this GNU/Linux Basic guide and it will show you how to approach and solve the problems you encounter.
Click Here to receive this Complete Guide absolutely free. |
|
 |
09-05-2005, 09:50 AM
|
#1
|
|
Member
Registered: Jun 2003
Location: SoCal
Distribution: CentOS
Posts: 465
Rep:
|
blackhole list vs spamassassin
Alrighty I'm setting up a new postfix mail server and I had a question about spam. I've read that using RBLs and spamassassin can really slow down the mail server so I'm probably going to start out with just one. If one method can block a lot of the spam then I'll be set. If a lot of spam still gets through then I'll probably use both.
So which should i use, a blackhole list like spamhaus, or spamassassin?
Also for those who recommend spamassassin, if you have any good links that explain how to configure spamassassin with postfix id appreciate it. Thanks.
|
|
|
|
09-05-2005, 03:16 PM
|
#2
|
|
Member
Registered: Jun 2003
Location: SoCal
Distribution: CentOS
Posts: 465
Original Poster
Rep:
|
bumpy bumpy
|
|
|
|
09-05-2005, 04:37 PM
|
#3
|
|
Senior Member
Registered: Dec 2004
Location: Bawstun area
Distribution: Suse (10.2, 10.3), CentOS, and Ubuntu
Posts: 1,794
Rep:
|
You're not supposed to bump a thread until at least 24 hours passes; doing so is a good way to get ignored (and get spanked by the mods)
|
|
|
|
09-05-2005, 05:47 PM
|
#4
|
|
Member
Registered: Jun 2003
Location: SoCal
Distribution: CentOS
Posts: 465
Original Poster
Rep:
|
well, since you replied with that, and I now get to reply to your reply, I get two more free bumps...
Thanks!
Now back to my thread:
I think Im going to setup the blackhole list now, and if it does a good job at blocking a majority of our spam, and I dont get any reports of email not being received I'll stick to that. If the blackhole list doesnt work I'll setup spamassassin and see how the two together effect my email performance. If using both is too taxing I'll eliminate the blackhole list and stick with sa.
|
|
|
|
09-05-2005, 06:30 PM
|
#5
|
|
Member
Registered: Dec 2003
Distribution: FC9 on main server
Posts: 621
Rep:
|
Spamassassin on my server blocks about 99% of spam. Maybe 98% to be fair, but out of 100's of spam emails per day it does a decent job.
That's after lot of tweaking though. By default it practically lets everything through, the default rules SUCK, but fear not, as you can download some, and by enabling bayes, you should increase it's accuracy.
Take a look at how to use spamd/spamc combination which is much more efficient then the "normal" default way of using it.
Good luck killing spam! I have a passion for it myself. 
|
|
|
|
09-05-2005, 07:34 PM
|
#6
|
|
Moderator
Registered: Apr 2002
Location: in a fallen world
Distribution: slackware by choice, others too :} ... android.
Posts: 22,903
|
Quote:
Originally posted by msound
well, since you replied with that, and I now get to reply to your reply, I get two more free bumps...
Thanks!
|
And here's another "free bump" for you, this time from
a mod. And next time you bump before 24 hours have
passed I'll either close you thread myself or have it
closed by another mod. You were in a clear violation
of the rules you agreed to.
Cheers,
Tink
|
|
|
|
09-06-2005, 04:35 AM
|
#7
|
|
Senior Member
Registered: Nov 2000
Location: Seattle, WA USA
Distribution: Ubuntu @ Home, RHEL @ Work
Posts: 3,892
Rep:
|
Just to make it clear.... the forum software auto-bumps posts with 0 replies.....
Your always better off leaving it at 0 replies then bumping it as it will get bumped automatically and it will stay on the 0 reply list that so many users check for questions to answer.
|
|
|
|
| Thread Tools |
Search this Thread |
|
|
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
All times are GMT -5. The time now is 01:40 AM.
|
|
LinuxQuestions.org is looking for people interested in writing
Editorials, Articles, Reviews, and more. If you'd like to contribute
content, let us know.
|
Latest Threads
LQ News
|
|