Linux - SoftwareThis forum is for Software issues.
Having a problem installing a new program? Want to know which application is best for the job? Post your question in this forum.
Welcome to LinuxQuestions.org, a friendly and active Linux Community.
You are currently viewing LQ as a guest. By joining our community you will have the ability to post topics, receive our newsletter, use the advanced search, subscribe to threads and access many other special features. Registration is quick, simple and absolutely free. Join our community today!
Note that registered members see fewer ads, and ContentLink is completely disabled once you log in.
If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us. If you need to reset your password, click here.
Having a problem logging in? Please visit this page to clear all LQ-related cookies.
Introduction to Linux - A Hands on Guide
This guide was created as an overview of the Linux Operating System, geared toward new users as an exploration tour and getting started guide, with exercises at the end of each chapter.
For more advanced trainees it can be a desktop reference, and a collection of the base knowledge needed to proceed with system and network administration. This book contains many real life examples derived from the author's experience as a Linux system and network administrator, trainer and consultant. They hope these examples will help you to get a better understanding of the Linux system and that you feel encouraged to try out things on your own.
Click Here to receive this Complete Guide absolutely free.
Mozilla is what most people use. Firefox are for people that find options mentally demanding. Your choice though. Dillo is the fastest graphical. Lynx is the better text browser. Mozilla is the most full featured.
Heh, that's pure feldercarb. Mozilla.org has discontinued the mozilla project and is developing up firefox. The idea of poorly organized options is what pisses people off. Put a direction sign upside down on the opposite side of the road you people will not respond to the option. It has nothing to do with being challenging to them. Besides, you'd have to be a fool to think that anyone using linux doesn't like options. The best programmers can do it while presenting few options. They just know what to do and how to do it right so they don't always need lots of options. Bad presentation of those options turn people off fast. But that has nothing to do with Mozilla as it has a pittance of options of any real value.
As for the best browser. You could just use konqueror. I personally like Opera (which has a huge selection of options), but what I hated when I first used it was the poorly chosen options they used as defaults. I've configured it and am very happy with Opera. Aside from some poorly worded descriptions and some faulty options (options that don't actually do what they say) the program is pretty nice once configured.
Originally posted by Jimbo99
The best programmers can do it while presenting few options. They just know what to do and how to do it right so they don't always need lots of options.[/B]
That's assuming that all users have exactly the same needs, which is a fatal error when designing any product!
Good software designers realise that their personal preferences are just that, and allow other people to have different requirements. Without options, a product is only fit for the needs of the one person who's needs it was designed around. With options, it can satisfy a diverse range of people with differing requirements.
Sounds more like a video or system prpblem to me. Have you looked at xorg config options?
Firefox has my vote for the best browser. Any browser you get will do about the same thing ,render html, graphics and call plugins. Firefox is one of the least bloated.
Has X ever frozen when you werent using a browser?
Mozilla was one of my first forays into the open source world. I tried out Firefox but there were some options in Mozilla that I could just not do without. There are a ton of similarities, but Firefox ( for some reason ) gets the most press. I remember it kept having problems with its name ( Phoenix, Firebird ) and I really wondered why they were making it. Older versions of Mozilla were resource intensive and even after 1.0 it was buggy. After version 1.5, Mozilla's code really improved and those issues were things of the past. By then however, people who remembered the buggy resource hogging Mozilla were ready for something new - hence Firebird took off.
It's really up to you. I haven't tried a ton of browsers under Linux ( Konqueror, Firefox, and my favorite - Mozilla ), so take my recommendation with a grain of salt.