Linux - SoftwareThis forum is for Software issues.
Having a problem installing a new program? Want to know which application is best for the job? Post your question in this forum.
Notices
Welcome to LinuxQuestions.org, a friendly and active Linux Community.
You are currently viewing LQ as a guest. By joining our community you will have the ability to post topics, receive our newsletter, use the advanced search, subscribe to threads and access many other special features. Registration is quick, simple and absolutely free. Join our community today!
Note that registered members see fewer ads, and ContentLink is completely disabled once you log in.
If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us. If you need to reset your password, click here.
Having a problem logging in? Please visit this page to clear all LQ-related cookies.
Get a virtual cloud desktop with the Linux distro that you want in less than five minutes with Shells! With over 10 pre-installed distros to choose from, the worry-free installation life is here! Whether you are a digital nomad or just looking for flexibility, Shells can put your Linux machine on the device that you want to use.
Exclusive for LQ members, get up to 45% off per month. Click here for more info.
Till now I was using emacs ( and xemacs ) , which is very powerful, but some how I am not happy with GUI that emcas provides ( After working with some power ful Windows editor -): ).
In windows I am using Source Insight which I likes very well.
What I am looking for is an editor which can provide context sensitive help ( like auto completion of functions and symbols ,
details about function definiton and declaration etc )
im not sure whether you realise but emacs has autocompletion of symbols M-<TAB> iirc, the help system is also much more powerful than any other, there is a key combination for help on current word but ive forgotten. it also has multiple windows, and in gui mofe multiple frames as well.
ive just found a screenshot of source insight, it doesnt look that fancy certanly no better than kdevelop(*shudders*), although the syntax highlighting looks way over the top.
I believe that these features are not by default in emcas. You need to get the proper lisp code for that. Isn't it?. And this is a time consuming job.
Apart from this the GUI ( the window that appears for context sensitive help, for auto completion etc ) is far inferior compared to the windows editors.
all the features ive listed above come as standard with emacs, and if you dont like the windows use a new frame instead. im not really an expert on emacs though, i only use it when connecting to a particular solaris machine(it has vim < 6.0 so i dont have much choice) from what ive heard installing lisp scripts isnt too hard but as i say i dont know cos i dont really use emacs, im just saying it does have the features you list - i wouldnt want you to change editor out of ignorance.
LinuxQuestions.org is looking for people interested in writing
Editorials, Articles, Reviews, and more. If you'd like to contribute
content, let us know.