LinuxQuestions.org

LinuxQuestions.org (/questions/)
-   Linux - Software (http://www.linuxquestions.org/questions/linux-software-2/)
-   -   Best IMAP Server for an ISP (http://www.linuxquestions.org/questions/linux-software-2/best-imap-server-for-an-isp-4175414501/)

foxmurder 07-02-2012 04:01 PM

Best IMAP Server for an ISP
 
Hey guys,

Which IMAP server for Linux do you think I should use in an ISP with about 10.000+ users?

Now we are using courrier imap, but I am searching other possibilities too.

What do you guys think about dovecot? It seems promising... And about others?

Kustom42 07-02-2012 04:03 PM

Dovecot is great, I've used it before for a few clients and haven't had many issues, but(and don't shoot me for this) I have always been a fan of Microsoft Exchange for the handling of enterprise level email requirements. It has been more stable, scalable, and easier to use from a client side due to AD integration.

Kustom42 07-02-2012 04:05 PM

Or better yet, you could outsource your email to a hosted exchange provider and get a decent deal on that many email addresses. I have always hated dealing with e-mail due to the amount of client complaints, most of which are client side issues. Thats just my personal thought, some people love SMTP response codes and walking folks through outlook setup.

foxmurder 07-02-2012 05:05 PM

Hehehe, no chance at all.

It must be Linux and we must support it (orders from above :)).

But thanks for your reply. :D

Kustom42 07-02-2012 05:07 PM

Then I would probably say dovecot/postfix is a good solution. I have seen people use qmail as well but have seen a few weird issues with it, that's just my two cents.

LastChip 07-02-2012 08:33 PM

Debian
 
Debian, Postfix, Dovecot.

Take a look at workaround.org for an in depth and probably the best ever tutorial on implementation.

I use it and it's as smooth as silk.

countrygrrl_ak 07-03-2012 12:58 PM

Not that my mail server has the amount of users your asking about. But I love qmail with Dovecot.

You didn't ask about the MTA, but qmail has the ability to block a large number of spam sources through RBL, Greylist, greet delay, blocking by IP, and your own Whitelist/IP. I have used these combinations for around 5 years with no problems.

Kustom42 07-03-2012 01:24 PM

I worked for a web-host provider and we used qmail/dovecot for our enterprise level email services as the MTA and it had quite a few problems when trying to handle the amount of emails generated. I love qmail for the individual as it has a lot of flexibility but I personally suggest postfix for enterprise level stability and scalability. Again, just an opinion I'm sure you wouldn't be in terribly bad shape if you went with qmail or even exim.

foxmurder 07-03-2012 01:34 PM

We use postfix as MTA too. Right now we aren't thinking about changing because postfix is quite stable in our infrastructure. What we really need is a new IMAP server that is stable, modular, scalable and has a good performance in a scenario like ours. :D

danliston 07-03-2012 05:19 PM

From this thread I see it is mandated to run on linux, but does that mean it has to be free and open source too? The old Sun/iPlanet software is now owned by Oracle, but it is "extremely" scalable, modular, reliable, flexible, etc. 10,000 simultaneous connections are small potatoes in the solaris environments I have worked in, but with LDAP and clustered mailbox servers on the back end storage layer, and load balanced SMTP and POP/IMAP proxies on the front end access layer, you could probably offer your customers 99.99% uptime (assuming power, cooling, and other dependent components are also redundant to the same level) even in linux. Considering your entire IMAP population is only 10K, 1,000 simultaneous connections would probably be peak load. You may want to consider your traffic and architecture, as well as population and load to get the most effective solution for your environment's needs.


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 03:42 AM.