LinuxQuestions.org
Register a domain and help support LQ
Go Back   LinuxQuestions.org > Forums > Linux Forums > Linux - Software
User Name
Password
Linux - Software This forum is for Software issues.
Having a problem installing a new program? Want to know which application is best for the job? Post your question in this forum.

Notices



Reply
 
Search this Thread
Old 11-27-2004, 03:21 AM   #1
simon196405
LQ Newbie
 
Registered: Nov 2004
Location: Utrecht, Holland
Distribution: Gentoo
Posts: 1

Rep: Reputation: 0
backup to CD (mondo-rescue, dar or partimage)


I'm interested to know what the best software is to backup to CD.
At the moment I use mondo-rescue and I'm quit happy with it. However dar and partimage seem also popular.
How do they compare?
Which do you prefer, and why:

To get the discussion started some points to use to compare them:

-restore when the computer doesn't boot anymore
-user friendlyness when restoring a single file.
-size of archive
-support for AMD64 and x86.
-speed of archiving
-How easy is it to restore to another PC with a different hardware configuration
-how much data do you lose when the archive is damaged in the middle. (I learned the hard way not to use zipped tar.

Hope for some clarification on this issues.

Simon Siemonsma
Utrecht, Holland

Last edited by simon196405; 11-27-2004 at 04:58 AM.
 
Old 11-27-2004, 04:09 AM   #2
bigrigdriver
LQ Addict
 
Registered: Jul 2002
Location: East Centra Illinois, USA
Distribution: Debian Squeeze
Posts: 5,805

Rep: Reputation: 324Reputation: 324Reputation: 324Reputation: 324
I've never used Mondo. After reading up on it, it seemed like overkill for my needs. PartImage would be useful if I wanted to ghost a partition. However, the main limitation I find with PartImage is that the partitions must be the same size (object and target). I read a work-around to the size limitation, but that way some time ago, and I don't remember it.

I spent the last 4 years looking for a backup option that would give me what I wanted. I tried commercial, shareware, and common Unix tools such as tar. Tar doesn't do it, mainly because tar makes one file, and if any part is corrupted, you loose it all.

This year, I finally tried Dar. Wow! That's what I've been looking for all this time.

To address the points in your post:
-Dar provides a static version of itself which can be copied to the backup media before backup begins. If you've trashed your system somehow, you can boot from a rescue disk, or your distro's install cd, copy dar back to the hdd, then begin restoration.

-Backup options in dar include multi-disk backups to: floppy, zip, cd, and dvd. It also possible to make one monolithic backup, then later split it across multiple disks (slices in dar-speak).

-I tested the backup by renaming folders and individual files, then restored from backup without any problems. Dar backs up each file individually. Just specify the path to the folder or file to restore, and dar does it.

-I backed up 6.6 G and ended up with a 4.0 G compressed backup. Dar testimonials claim backups of terabyte systems.

-hardware support? Dar doesn't seem to be hardware dependant.

-speed of archiving is limited by the speed of the system you're using. My box is 4 years old and slow (450 MHz cpu). It took over an hour, but less that two hours, to backup and verify.

-restore to another cd? I don't know.

-data loss is minimal if a part of the archive is corrupted. Since dar backs up each file individually, you can't loose the entire backup unless you try very hard to make it happen. If one file is corrupted, dar has a skip-ahead feature which allows restoration of most of the file. You would then need to examine it to see which part need to be repaired.

I haven't seen such functionality in any other backup solution I have tried.
 
  


Reply


Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Anybody using Mondo Rescue under FC4? cruiserparts Linux - Software 1 07-26-2005 04:27 PM
Mondo rescue cd.. hitesh_linux Linux - General 1 10-24-2004 09:52 AM
Mondo-rescue restore onto system with Win2K Jondalar Linux - General 1 12-04-2003 06:05 AM
Mondo Rescue Problems saintt Linux - Software 1 01-29-2003 08:11 PM
Mondo: backup across network? lhoff Linux - Software 0 06-01-2002 04:27 PM


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 05:23 PM.

Main Menu
Advertisement
My LQ
Write for LQ
LinuxQuestions.org is looking for people interested in writing Editorials, Articles, Reviews, and more. If you'd like to contribute content, let us know.
Main Menu
Syndicate
RSS1  Latest Threads
RSS1  LQ News
Twitter: @linuxquestions
identi.ca: @linuxquestions
Facebook: linuxquestions Google+: linuxquestions
Open Source Consulting | Domain Registration