Linux - SoftwareThis forum is for Software issues.
Having a problem installing a new program? Want to know which application is best for the job? Post your question in this forum.
Welcome to LinuxQuestions.org, a friendly and active Linux Community.
You are currently viewing LQ as a guest. By joining our community you will have the ability to post topics, receive our newsletter, use the advanced search, subscribe to threads and access many other special features. Registration is quick, simple and absolutely free. Join our community today!
Note that registered members see fewer ads, and ContentLink is completely disabled once you log in.
If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us. If you need to reset your password, click here.
Having a problem logging in? Please visit this page to clear all LQ-related cookies.
Introduction to Linux - A Hands on Guide
This guide was created as an overview of the Linux Operating System, geared toward new users as an exploration tour and getting started guide, with exercises at the end of each chapter.
For more advanced trainees it can be a desktop reference, and a collection of the base knowledge needed to proceed with system and network administration. This book contains many real life examples derived from the author's experience as a Linux system and network administrator, trainer and consultant. They hope these examples will help you to get a better understanding of the Linux system and that you feel encouraged to try out things on your own.
Click Here to receive this Complete Guide absolutely free.
Whenever I apt-get install xxx, though, I'm invariably prompted to confirm the install/upgrade of ~120 packages, many from the testing/unstable branches, and many seemingly irrelevant (such as games). Additionally, apt insists on removing ~70 completely unrelated packages(it needs to remove kscreensaver to install licq?). Surely, this isn't normal...
Distribution: Gentoo, Debian, Ubuntu, Red Hat/CentOS
First off let me say that I use apt for rpm and know only a tad about Deb. But what I do know tells me that Deb uses older proven software in almost all apps. they do that b/c it is very stable as all the bugs have been worked out. Now if you are trying to use some newer software that relies on updated libs/apps/utils...I could see how you may need to upgrade all that software. Just a hunch.
Originally posted by KevB
If you didn't intend to upgrade to testing/unstable you've put the wrong sources into sources.list.
I suppose I expected to be able to install individual packages from outside the stable branch without radically changing the rest of my mostly stable system. If I include nothing but the stable branch in my sources.list, of course, then I can't install any software that's not already on my local set of CD ROMS. So I guess my question is this:
How can I use apt to install stuff outside of the Deb stable distribution without upgrading my entire system?
I read this somewhere, but I can't for the life of me remember where. Add the following lines to your apt.conf file in /etc/apt:
This will allow you to include the testing distribution in your sources.list and install from it. But if you install a package that depends on newer versions of other packages you might end up breaking alot of dependencies.
P.S. A quick google gave a cool site that explains how to maintain a sources.list with more than 2 sources. It's called apt pinning. I haven't used this myself, but I definitely plan on it.
Last edited by footfrisbee; 06-14-2003 at 11:19 PM.
Thanks for the link, Frisbee; it cleared up some confusion about how the priority system works in APT.
I guess I was just underestimating the magnitude of deps conflicts that arise from a mixed system. Removing the unstable branch from my sources made things mostly manageable. Still, though, I don't understand why APT wants to remove scores of unrelated packages from my system. Maybe I should just post the output of my apt-get session
gilliam:/etc/apt# apt-get install gkrellm
Reading Package Lists... Done
Building Dependency Tree... Done
The following extra packages will be installed:
debconf debconf-utils debhelper defoma fontconfig gcc-3.3-base gkrellm-common libatk1.0-0 libc6 libc6-dev libdb1-compat
libexpat1 libfontconfig1 libfreetype6 libgcc1 libglib2.0-0 libglib2.0-data libgtk2.0-0 libgtk2.0-common libncurses5
libpango1.0-0 libpango1.0-common libpng12-0 libstdc++5 libxft2 locales nethack-common po-debconf xbase-clients xfree86-common
xlibmesa3-glu xlibs xlibs-dev
The following packages will be REMOVED:
abiword abiword-common abiword-gtk abiword-plugins ark cdbakeoven kab karm kate kcalc kcharselect kchart kcoloredit kcron kde
kdebase kdebase-audiolibs kdebase-libs kdelibs3 kdelibs3-bin kdepasswd kdepim-libs kdf kdict kdm kedit kfind kformula kfract
kghostview khexedit kiconedit kit kivio kjots kmail knewsticker knode knotes koffice koffice-libs konqueror konsole kontour
korganizer korn koshell kpackage kpaint kpm kpresenter kruler kscreensaver ksirc ksnapshot kspread ksysv ktimer kugar kuser
kview kword libgtk-common libkdenetwork1 libkmid libkonq3 libnss-db libpango-common secpolicy
The following NEW packages will be installed:
fontconfig gcc-3.3-base gkrellm-common libdb1-compat libfontconfig1 libpng12-0 libstdc++5 libxft2 po-debconf xlibmesa3-glu
24 packages upgraded, 10 newly installed, 69 to remove and 703 not upgraded.
Need to get 22.4MB of archives. After unpacking 113MB will be freed.
Do you want to continue? [Y/n]
It looks like you're upgrading to or installing packages that break dependencies. Apt tries as hard as it can (by default) to keep your system clean of broken dependencies, so it removes all of the packages necessary to do this.
Personally, I run the testing distribution without problems. All of the software is well updated. Every once in a while I'll install an unstable package by hand.
A couple exceptions do come to mind though. One of them is mozilla. The testing distribution keeps a terribly old mozilla package, while I like to run Firebird. So I install that myself. The Debian file structure makes this easy by providing /usr/local for non-standard installations. This works great for Mathematica as well.
Darn you, Frisbee, you've spoiled my dreams of never having to manually install software ever again I guess I'll use APT to take care of stable tree stuff, and keep on using tarballs for CoolNewStuff(tm).
I might have installed from testing ISOs if I knew that it was seemingly so stable(and if I knew that "stable" packages were often so very very old). Would it be painful to have APT up my system to "testing"?
I'm also a big fan of Firebird, but the binary is a 30 second install anyway. It does bug me that the new interface is missing a lot of configuration options, but that's a matter for another thread.
Ok, "apt-get update" does *not* install anything, it simply updates the list of packages that are available. If you run apt-get update, then apt-get install xxxx, then its going to want to install xxxx, *plus* the 120odd packages that have been upgraded.