|
Amavis "makes SPAM" of my Mails
Hi there,
when I send mails to a friend, the Mailserver of his ISP detects my mails as SPAM.
I found out, that this is due to sending my mails through a local SuSE-Linux-Mailserver, that is running AmavisD. So when I send my mails using webmail the mails is not detected as SPAM, but when I send it through my mailserver, it is.
So I think that the header lines added from my local Mailserver are responsible for beeing detected as SPAM, maybe they are incorrect or indicate in any way beeing SPAM.
Here are the lines added from the local Mailserver to every mail I send out:
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])
by linux.mydomain.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id EB9885C745
for <wim@netcologne.de>; Tue, 29 Nov 2005 14:41:47 +0100 (CET)
Received: from linux.mydomain.de ([127.0.0.1])
by localhost (linux.mydomain.de [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)
with ESMTP id 06151-06 for <wim@netcologne.de>;
Tue, 29 Nov 2005 14:41:43 +0100 (CET)
Received: from [127.0.0.1] (localhost [127.0.0.1])
by linux.mydomain.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id 248BD5C76F
for <wim@netcologne.de>; Tue, 29 Nov 2005 14:41:43 +0100 (CET)
"mydomain.de" is my really registered domain, "liqui.mydomain.de" is my only local resolvable mailserver.
The lines added from the receiving mailserver (NetCologne.de) that detects my mails as SPAM are:
X-WW-Spam-Likelihood: Bayesian=50, BodyRules=50, DBL=50, HeaderRules=50, Mailshell=62, RBL=70, total=79
X-NetCologne-Spam: M
Is there something wrong with my mail headers? Do I have to configure Postfix or AmavisD in a different way?
What can I do to avoid that my mails are detected as SPAM?
Thank you for any help.
peter
PS: Here is the complete mail header:
Return-Path: <mail@mydomain.de>
Received: from mailstore9.netcologne.de ([unix socket])
by mailstore9.netcologne.de (Cyrus) with LMTPA;
Tue, 29 Nov 2005 14:58:21 +0100
Received: from nospam2.netcologne.de (nospam2.netcologne.de [194.8.194.172])
by mailstore9.netcologne.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id DA719CA
for <wim@mailstore9.netcologne.de>; Tue, 29 Nov 2005 14:58:21 +0100 (MET)
Received: from nospam.netcologne.de (localhost [127.0.0.1])
by nospam2.netcologne.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id C61C125AD30
for <wim@mailstore9.netcologne.de>; Tue, 29 Nov 2005 14:58:21 +0100 (CET)
Received: from mx4.netcologne.de [194.8.194.246] by nospam.netcologne.de id 5NSWNG23 outgoing id 5NSWNG23; 29 Nov 2005 14:58:21 +0100
Received: from wp030.webpack.hosteurope.de (wp030.webpack.hosteurope.de [80.237.132.37])
by mx4.netcologne.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id 995251CC02F
for <wim@netcologne.de>; Tue, 29 Nov 2005 14:58:21 +0100 (CET)
Received: by wp030.webpack.hosteurope.de running Exim 4.43 using esmtpa
from p5089a163.dip0.t-ipconnect.de ([80.137.161.99] helo=linux.mydomain.de)
id 1Eh5j3-0004N5-HQ; Tue, 29 Nov 2005 14:40:53 +0100
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])
by linux.mydomain.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id EB9885C745
for <wim@netcologne.de>; Tue, 29 Nov 2005 14:41:47 +0100 (CET)
Received: from linux.mydomain.de ([127.0.0.1])
by localhost (linux.mydomain.de [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)
with ESMTP id 06151-06 for <wim@netcologne.de>;
Tue, 29 Nov 2005 14:41:43 +0100 (CET)
Received: from [127.0.0.1] (localhost [127.0.0.1])
by linux.mydomain.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id 248BD5C76F
for <wim@netcologne.de>; Tue, 29 Nov 2005 14:41:43 +0100 (CET)
Message-ID: <438C5A96.6070000@mydomain.de>
Date: Tue, 29 Nov 2005 14:41:42 +0100
From: "Peter" <mail@mydomain.de>
User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5 (X11/20051025)
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Wim <wim@netcologne.de>
Subject: Test
References: <004101c5f4da$57c71580$0200a8c0@SDNNotebook>
In-Reply-To: <004101c5f4da$57c71580$0200a8c0@SDNNotebook>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-15; format=flowed
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at mydomain.de
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-WW-Spam-Likelihood: Bayesian=50, BodyRules=50, DBL=50, HeaderRules=50, Mailshell=62, RBL=70, total=79
X-NetCologne-Spam: M
|
