LinuxQuestions.org
Welcome to the most active Linux Forum on the web.
Home Forums Tutorials Articles Register
Go Back   LinuxQuestions.org > Forums > Linux Forums > Linux - Software
User Name
Password
Linux - Software This forum is for Software issues.
Having a problem installing a new program? Want to know which application is best for the job? Post your question in this forum.

Notices


Reply
  Search this Thread
Old 10-17-2010, 12:04 PM   #1
CyyberspaceCowboy
LQ Newbie
 
Registered: Aug 2009
Posts: 19

Rep: Reputation: 0
A special steps require to re-initial RAID0 array created with mdadm?


I'm building a Myth box out of old hardware. I installed the system on an 80Gb IDE boot drive and planned to use two 430Gb IDE drives in a stripped array for storage.

I had Mythbuntu all configured save for designating the storage volume. I opened the terminal and created the stripped array (both secondaries on separate IDE channels) with mdadm at /dev/md0. I formatted the newly created array EXT3 with mke2fs. I wanted to create a storage folder at root on the array and I meant to type "cd /dev/md0" but typed /dev/mdo instead. The terminal locked and every though I could click on the menu bar, noting responded. On hard reboot, I got a screen full of errors and no GUI (yes, I should have recorded the erros but my thought was to start over fresh now that I have the config down. I already deleted the volumes on the boot disk.

Do I have to do anything special to re-initialize the drives from the array? FDisk (on Crunchbang Ubuntu live CD) still sees the array as one drive but sees no formatted volumes. I bought half a dozen of these IDE drives on NewEgg a while back, I eventually determined one came DOA, so these may have errors that only presented when I started writing to them and that may be my problem.

Last edited by CyyberspaceCowboy; 10-17-2010 at 12:06 PM. Reason: Check notifications
 
Old 10-18-2010, 01:30 PM   #2
Stephannn
Member
 
Registered: Oct 2010
Location: San Francisco, CA
Distribution: Snow Leopard, Ubuntu, RedHat
Posts: 64

Rep: Reputation: 14
You can use smartctl to run self-checks on your disks to make sure they're functioning correctly. Assuming the disks pass the check, the RAID drives probably still have their superblock RAID information present, the bit of information mdadm uses to determine if there is a functioning RAID or not. Assuming a drive you're trying to reset are at hda, you can zero the superblock out with:

Code:
mdadm --zero-superblock /dev/hda
From there, you can create the array fresh.
 
Old 10-19-2010, 12:47 PM   #3
CyyberspaceCowboy
LQ Newbie
 
Registered: Aug 2009
Posts: 19

Original Poster
Rep: Reputation: 0
Stephan,
smartctl /dev/md0 says it can't ID the type of device. I've tried -d ata and -d megaraid and both came back "device not found". smartctl -a /dev/sdb and smartctl -a /dev/sdc ame back without errors.

I'm afraid I got impatient and jumped the gun before waiting for a reply. Since I'd already had one DOA drive in the half dozen I bought a couple years ago on NewEgg (not such a great bargain now) I ran SeaTools boot disk against both drives individually and one had multiple, uncorrectable errors. I put in another identical 430Gb drive and started over w/o doing anything to remove the first array. Thanks for giving me mdadm --zero-superblock /dev/hda, I may decide to start over once more.

Before I do that, I think I am missing a step in my configuration and I hope someone can advise me.

What I've done: (presume commands preceded with sudo)

mdadm -C /dev/md0 -l 0 -n 2 /dev/sdb /dev/sdc
#some examples show /dev/sdb1 /dev/sdc1, is that my problem?
#most examples specify a chuck size, I used the default
#No errors on creating the array, so it needs to be formatted
mkfs -t ext4 -c /dev/md0
#Told me the volume was created with no errors, checked for bad sectors because these are refurb drives from NewEgg
#created my desired mountpoint
mkdir /storage
#Added the following to /etc/fstab (I originally used the UUID,
#discovered with blkid, but switched to /dev/md0 when
#volume wasn't auto mounted)
/dev/md0 /storage ext4 rw,auto,user,exec,async 0 1

On reboot, I get "the disk drive for /storage is not ready yet or not present"
On further research, I made a /etc/mdadm.conf containing:
DEVICE /dev/sdb /dev/sdc
ARRAY /dev/md0 devices=/dev/sdb,/dev/sdc

On another reboot I get the same message with an opportunity to drop to terminal and fix the problem
If I try to manually "sudo mount -t ext4 /dev/md0 /storage" I get: "special device /dev/md0 does not exist"

I've seen references to array "activation" but commands like raidstart seem to be depricated and I get the impression mdadm was supposed to do it for me. What did I miss?
 
Old 10-19-2010, 04:48 PM   #4
Stephannn
Member
 
Registered: Oct 2010
Location: San Francisco, CA
Distribution: Snow Leopard, Ubuntu, RedHat
Posts: 64

Rep: Reputation: 14
Heya CC,

Briefly, the commands you've used aren't creating the arrays on partitions, but rather on entire disks. This means you're not able to set the partition types to Linux RAID, likely giving the system a good deal of confusion as to exactly what devices your hard drives actually are. Also, smartmontools only checks the SMART status of physical drives; it won't recognize a RAID array, because a RAID isn't actually a hard drive, but rather a virtual grouping of hard drives. SMART data is only available on each individual drive. I suggest you run the extended SMART scan on the drives before assembling the array (though it'll take you an hourish to run on both drives I suspect.) The command is:

Code:
smartctl -t long /dev/sdb
and then running

Code:
smartctl -HcA /dev/sdb
on both of the drives. The first command runs an extended self-test, the second command spits out both it's 'general' self-assessment, and the raw data behind that assessment. Pay attention to the RAW_VALUE of Reallocated Sector_Ct and Current_Pending_Sector values, as these are common indicators of an old or defective hard disk. My personal recommendation is to use the Ubuntu live DVD (I like 10.04 and 10.10) as the 'Disk Utility' offers a nice graphical interface for running these tests, so you don't have to mess with the command line if you don't wish.

You'll need to start from scratch with the RAID again. Use fdisk (or, my preference, gdisk to create a GUID partition table, as GUID is more robust and the direction of future filesystems) and then create one partition on each drive. Make sure the partitions are the same size (if the disks are identical in size, then you can just create one partition on each drive that spans the entire disk) and assign them the disk filesystem ID of fd (or fd00 depending on if you use fdisk or gdisk; using the 'l' command should print out the hex filesystem types in either case.)

Once you've done that, you'll be able to create your new RAID without any trouble. There's a very good tutorial on how to set up your RAID here, including a few thoughts on chunk size: http://tldp.org/HOWTO/Software-RAID-HOWTO-5.html

Good luck!
 
  


Reply



Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off



Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Migrate RAID0 array to RAID10 with mdadm jimbro727 Linux - General 6 07-17-2009 07:01 PM
raid0 created by mdadm can't be mounted after re-install the system nxnh Linux - Server 3 03-04-2009 08:05 PM
Changing superblock for MDADM raid0 harddrives? TefoZi Linux - Newbie 1 04-07-2008 09:22 PM
mdadm assemble weirdness with partitionable RAID0 Schneckl Linux - Software 0 08-28-2007 05:45 PM
mdadm: no devices ... were found after RAID0 install hedpe Linux - Software 4 06-28-2007 01:38 PM

LinuxQuestions.org > Forums > Linux Forums > Linux - Software

All times are GMT -5. The time now is 02:07 PM.

Main Menu
Advertisement
My LQ
Write for LQ
LinuxQuestions.org is looking for people interested in writing Editorials, Articles, Reviews, and more. If you'd like to contribute content, let us know.
Main Menu
Syndicate
RSS1  Latest Threads
RSS1  LQ News
Twitter: @linuxquestions
Open Source Consulting | Domain Registration