Which Linux System is The Best For Web Application?
Linux - ServerThis forum is for the discussion of Linux Software used in a server related context.
Notices
Welcome to LinuxQuestions.org, a friendly and active Linux Community.
You are currently viewing LQ as a guest. By joining our community you will have the ability to post topics, receive our newsletter, use the advanced search, subscribe to threads and access many other special features. Registration is quick, simple and absolutely free. Join our community today!
Note that registered members see fewer ads, and ContentLink is completely disabled once you log in.
If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us. If you need to reset your password, click here.
Having a problem logging in? Please visit this page to clear all LQ-related cookies.
Get a virtual cloud desktop with the Linux distro that you want in less than five minutes with Shells! With over 10 pre-installed distros to choose from, the worry-free installation life is here! Whether you are a digital nomad or just looking for flexibility, Shells can put your Linux machine on the device that you want to use.
Exclusive for LQ members, get up to 45% off per month. Click here for more info.
OK, now that we're clear on that go ahead and follow the step by step guide. Once completed you'll have a functional webserver on which your users can upload their website. Using ISPConfig you'll administer who, what and how much they are allowed to use. You'll also be able to host multiple domain names, quota, bandwith quota, etc...
At the time, I used Fedora Core 5 for my webserver, but if I could go back, I'd do a gentoo minimal install. It's quick and there's nothing on there you won't want or need. A doddle to keep up-to-date as well.
Thanks. I will try my best and hope you guys will support me until I complete this course. Please don't forget to join me here tomorrow at 6PM +7 Time Zone. I'm always here at 6PM. This is like a big family. Good Luck everyone.
GPG or PGP stands for "Pretty Good Protection", and it is a method of verifying that downloaded and/or installed packages are digitally signed by their author, as opposed to some sort of package that has been maliciously altered by a third or 4th party.
You need GPG tools, as well as importing the public GPG keys of package or software authors, in order to use this functionality to verify the integrity of any package you plan to install.
Skipping this step could lead to rootkits, corrupted packages, and other bad things.
I try to install Development Tools as instruction and it showed message: This system is not registered with RHN. RHN support will be disabled.
I"m testing on Red Hat Enterprise Linux 5.
Code:
[root@server rpm-gpg]# yum groupinstall 'Development Tools'
Loading "rhnplugin" plugin
Loading "security" plugin
This system is not registered with RHN.
RHN support will be disabled.
rhel-debuginfo 100% |=========================| 951 B 00:00
Setting up Group Process
Warning: Group Development Tools does not exist.
No packages in any requested group available to install or update
That is to say, "If you want to know that you are installing non-altered packages, that are from where you believe them to be from, then GPG verification is MANDATORY."
This is true for every single Linux on the planet. Some form of verifying that packages and software is not corrupted. Otherwise, you're playing with fire, so to speak.
I try to install Development Tools as instruction and it showed message: This system is not registered with RHN. RHN support will be disabled.
I"m testing on Red Hat Enterprise Linux 5.
Code:
[root@server rpm-gpg]# yum groupinstall 'Development Tools'
Loading "rhnplugin" plugin
Loading "security" plugin
This system is not registered with RHN.
RHN support will be disabled.
rhel-debuginfo 100% |=========================| 951 B 00:00
Setting up Group Process
Warning: Group Development Tools does not exist.
No packages in any requested group available to install or update
I think I will temporary do it in Fedora 11. Will it be the same procedure as Enterprise Linux?
Hello,
It's better to go with CentOS in my opinion, since you have experience with RedHat. If you register with RedHat Network (RHN) you'll pay for support that you can get here for free.
Since you seem to be following the step by step guide that was proposed, you'd better go with the OS used in that guide (CentOS).
So, download the CentOS 5.2 CD, burn it and start the install at page one of the guide and you will not encounter those specific things to RHEL.
I think I will temporary do it in Fedora 11. Will it be the same procedure as Enterprise Linux?
As mentioned in my previous post, I'd prefer to go with CentOS, it's almost identical to RedHat Enterprise Linux (except for the colors and images like logos and stuff).
LinuxQuestions.org is looking for people interested in writing
Editorials, Articles, Reviews, and more. If you'd like to contribute
content, let us know.