| Linux - Server This forum is for the discussion of Linux Software used in a server related context. |
| Notices |
Welcome to LinuxQuestions.org, a friendly and active Linux Community.
You are currently viewing LQ as a guest. By joining our community you will have the ability to post topics, receive our newsletter, use the advanced search, subscribe to threads and access many other special features. Registration is quick, simple and absolutely free. Join our community today!
Note that registered members see fewer ads, and ContentLink is completely disabled once you log in.
Are you new to LinuxQuestions.org? Visit the following links:
Site Howto |
Site FAQ |
Sitemap |
Register Now
If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us. If you need to reset your password, click here.
Having a problem logging in? Please visit this page to clear all LQ-related cookies.
 |
GNU/Linux Basic Guide
This 255-page guide will provide you with the keys to understand the philosophy of free software, teach you how to use and handle it, and give you the tools required to move easily in the world of GNU/Linux. Many users and administrators will be taking their first steps with this GNU/Linux Basic guide and it will show you how to approach and solve the problems you encounter.
Click Here to receive this Complete Guide absolutely free. |
|
 |
11-19-2012, 12:30 PM
|
#1
|
|
Senior Member
Registered: Nov 2007
Location: Somewhere on my hard drive...
Distribution: Arch
Posts: 2,044
|
Wanted : server...
Hey gang,
I need to install a server - quick. I'm experimenting with freeBSD (my first choice, and by far the best I think) but...things are not going smoothly. Since FreeBSD is unix (not Linux) - my knowledge is somewhat on the skinny side.
Any suggestions for an other server?
Thanks
Thor
|
|
|
|
11-19-2012, 01:05 PM
|
#2
|
|
Member
Registered: Aug 2008
Location: Nova Scotia, Canada
Distribution: Slackware, OpenBSD, others periodically
Posts: 503
Rep: 
|
Depends on what the server is being sued for.
FreeBSD and OpenBSD are good server choices.
For Linux I chose Slackware and Debian for stability and reliability.
If I need a server to be compatible with some RedHat specific things I use CentOS.
|
|
|
2 members found this post helpful.
|
11-19-2012, 01:18 PM
|
#3
|
|
Senior Member
Registered: Nov 2007
Location: Somewhere on my hard drive...
Distribution: Arch
Posts: 2,044
Original Poster
|
Hey there NyteOwl,
Thanks for a reply...the weekend has been a b**ch 
As you aptly stated, FreeBSD and OpenBSD are prime choices, what I need though is a server that allows webpages, Java, PHP and mySQL to be served...
They differ radically from what I'm used to, so there comes the learning curve again...
So, if I get stuck, I'd best use Debian, as I know that one pretty well...
The server has to host (one day) on the real WWW, so a good OS to start with seems a must
Thanks
Thor
|
|
|
|
11-20-2012, 10:53 AM
|
#4
|
|
LQ Newbie
Registered: Nov 2011
Distribution: Debian, Slackware
Posts: 9
Rep: 
|
For me, Debian is an amazing distro to use for a web server. That's what I have been using full time. Recently I started experimenting with Slackware, that's great too but there is a lot for me to learn with Slackware. Debian is very simple to use and maintain, especially for a web server.
|
|
|
1 members found this post helpful.
|
11-23-2012, 04:02 AM
|
#5
|
|
Senior Member
Registered: Nov 2007
Location: Somewhere on my hard drive...
Distribution: Arch
Posts: 2,044
Original Poster
|
Thanks garryconn, this opened my eyes:
Quote:
|
Debian is very simple to use and maintain,
|
...because I'm not really given a lot of time...
Thanks
Thor
|
|
|
|
11-23-2012, 06:04 AM
|
#6
|
|
Senior Member
Registered: Dec 2011
Location: UK
Distribution: Debian Sid + various in VMs.
Posts: 1,831
|
The only potential drawback using Debian as a server over Slackware is that the package manager could be considered by some to be "too helpful" in that it often starts daemons as soon as the package is installed, rather than waiting for them to be started manually. This means, for example, as soon as you install Apache it is serving a web page. That's great for ease of use but some people think it's a little insecure to start a server with the default settings.
I've not used Slackware enough to know exactly how it compares to Debian for ease of use but I get the impression that it's actually not much harder (if at all) to look after once it's been set up. Once you learn the process installing and setting up Slackware certainly doesn't seem to take any longer than Debian, it's just different.
|
|
|
|
11-26-2012, 08:39 PM
|
#7
|
|
LQ Newbie
Registered: Nov 2011
Distribution: Debian, Slackware
Posts: 9
Rep: 
|
It would just load the default page, plus it's easy to shut it off. Also it's easy to configure within a few moments. There's no doubt about Apache running well on Slackware. Ironically, I have used Debian for awhile now and I am just starting to play around with Slackware (Excellent OS btw). However, I am not comfortable yet nor do I have enough experience with using Slackware as the OS on my web servers just yet. I am very comfortable administrating a Debian web server and have had amazing success doing so:
Code:
root@server2870:/# uptime
20:35:14 up 101 days, 23:11
Not bad for a Compaq Proliant ML-350 manufactured in 1999, dual 1Ghz Pentium III processors with 1.5Gb memory, setup in my steaming hot 92'degree home-office closet, which actively hosts 20+ websites (mainly WordPress blogs --MySQL, PHP).
Last edited by garryconn; 11-26-2012 at 08:42 PM.
|
|
|
|
11-26-2012, 09:26 PM
|
#8
|
|
Guru
Registered: Mar 2008
Posts: 8,552
|
hehehe " being sued for."
Almost any of the top thirty at distrowatch.com might be a good choice. Consider the ones made for or targeted towards server uses. RH clones, Opensuse and the bsd's. Freebsd is a very good and well used distro and more importantly, it is well documented and has all the web server tools available.
There are plenty of premade virtual machine images or appliances that one can use to try. Many have all the goodies you want pre-installed.
Generally it is hard for new users to go from one distro to the other.
Last edited by jefro; 11-26-2012 at 09:27 PM.
|
|
|
|
11-26-2012, 09:52 PM
|
#9
|
|
Senior Member
Registered: Nov 2007
Location: Somewhere on my hard drive...
Distribution: Arch
Posts: 2,044
Original Poster
|
Quote:
|
Freebsd is a very good and well used distro and more importantly, it is well documented and has all the web server tools available.
|
That was my main motivation to use FreeBSD, but the configuration is somewhat lengthy...if you're like me: not (yet) comfortable with UNIX instead of Linux...the systems are different, believe me.
Thor
|
|
|
|
| Thread Tools |
Search this Thread |
|
|
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
All times are GMT -5. The time now is 11:53 AM.
|
|
LinuxQuestions.org is looking for people interested in writing
Editorials, Articles, Reviews, and more. If you'd like to contribute
content, let us know.
|
Latest Threads
LQ News
|
|