LinuxQuestions.org
Visit Jeremy's Blog.
Home Forums Tutorials Articles Register
Go Back   LinuxQuestions.org > Forums > Linux Forums > Linux - Server
User Name
Password
Linux - Server This forum is for the discussion of Linux Software used in a server related context.

Notices


Reply
  Search this Thread
Old 12-16-2009, 01:41 AM   #1
saavik
Member
 
Registered: Nov 2001
Location: NRW, Germany
Distribution: SLES / FC/ OES / CentOS
Posts: 614

Rep: Reputation: 32
Unknown message : kernel: blocks= XXXX block_size= XXX


Hello!

We get the following message again and again. What does it mean:

Code:
Dec 16 08:36:01 ghxsapbc kernel:       blocks= 143305920 block_size= 512
Dec 16 08:36:01 ghxsapbc kernel:       heads= 255, sectors= 32, cylinders= 17562
Dec 16 08:36:01 ghxsapbc kernel:
Dec 16 08:36:02 ghxsapbc kernel:       blocks= 143305920 block_size= 512
Dec 16 08:36:02 ghxsapbc kernel:       heads= 255, sectors= 32, cylinders= 17562
Dec 16 08:36:02 ghxsapbc kernel:
 
Old 12-16-2009, 03:24 AM   #2
business_kid
LQ Guru
 
Registered: Jan 2006
Location: Ireland
Distribution: Slackware, Slarm64 & Android
Posts: 16,289

Rep: Reputation: 2322Reputation: 2322Reputation: 2322Reputation: 2322Reputation: 2322Reputation: 2322Reputation: 2322Reputation: 2322Reputation: 2322Reputation: 2322Reputation: 2322
It's the equivelant of '36 - 24 - 36' on a female for the disk :-). I'm sure that's a little different in centimetres, - something like '91 - 61 - 91' Vital statistics, in any case
Why it keeps spitting that out is different. It doesn't repeat like that normally. Have you extreme logging set up.
 
Old 12-16-2009, 03:38 AM   #3
saavik
Member
 
Registered: Nov 2001
Location: NRW, Germany
Distribution: SLES / FC/ OES / CentOS
Posts: 614

Original Poster
Rep: Reputation: 32
Now, I didn`t change a thing. It just started to appear.
I am sure it`s not an error message but I wounder why this message appears.

Kernel bug ?

Linux ghxsapbc 2.6.16.60-0.42.7-smp #1 SMP Tue Nov 3 11:20:42 UTC 2009 x86_64 x86_64 x86_64 GNU/Linux
 
Old 12-17-2009, 04:18 AM   #4
business_kid
LQ Guru
 
Registered: Jan 2006
Location: Ireland
Distribution: Slackware, Slarm64 & Android
Posts: 16,289

Rep: Reputation: 2322Reputation: 2322Reputation: 2322Reputation: 2322Reputation: 2322Reputation: 2322Reputation: 2322Reputation: 2322Reputation: 2322Reputation: 2322Reputation: 2322
Quote:
Originally Posted by saavik View Post
Kernel bug ?
no. Let it prattle.
 
Old 05-14-2010, 03:20 AM   #5
Jsuyk
LQ Newbie
 
Registered: May 2010
Location: The Netherlands
Distribution: CentOS, FreeBSD
Posts: 1

Rep: Reputation: 0
We have the same issue on at least two different CentOS servers, both running different kernels.

Linux <server1> 2.6.18-164.11.1.el5 #1 SMP Wed Jan 20 07:32:21 EST 2010 x86_64 x86_64 x86_64 GNU/Linux
blocks= 860050224 block_size= 512
heads= 255, sectors= 32, cylinders= 105399

blocks= 860050224 block_size= 512
heads= 255, sectors= 32, cylinders= 105399

blocks= 860050224 block_size= 512
heads= 255, sectors= 32, cylinders= 105399

Linux <server2> 2.6.18-164.15.1.el5 #1 SMP Wed Mar 17 11:30:06 EDT 2010 x86_64 x86_64 x86_64 GNU/Linux
blocks= 19534592432 block_size= 512
heads= 255, sectors= 32, cylinders= 2393946

blocks= 71065440 block_size= 512
heads= 255, sectors= 32, cylinders= 8709

blocks= 19534592432 block_size= 512
heads= 255, sectors= 32, cylinders= 2393946

blocks= 71065440 block_size= 512
heads= 255, sectors= 32, cylinders= 8709

Does someone has any idea why this happens?
 
Old 05-14-2010, 03:49 AM   #6
saavik
Member
 
Registered: Nov 2001
Location: NRW, Germany
Distribution: SLES / FC/ OES / CentOS
Posts: 614

Original Poster
Rep: Reputation: 32
no, i do not have any idea.

i just ignore that message at the moment. If anybody finds out, please let me know
 
Old 05-15-2010, 03:17 AM   #7
business_kid
LQ Guru
 
Registered: Jan 2006
Location: Ireland
Distribution: Slackware, Slarm64 & Android
Posts: 16,289

Rep: Reputation: 2322Reputation: 2322Reputation: 2322Reputation: 2322Reputation: 2322Reputation: 2322Reputation: 2322Reputation: 2322Reputation: 2322Reputation: 2322Reputation: 2322
That's not an issue, that's output!
Linux was written by programmers; the main thing they care about is what version of things they are running :-)
 
Old 08-23-2010, 06:52 AM   #8
naak
LQ Newbie
 
Registered: Aug 2010
Posts: 1

Rep: Reputation: 0
Hi,

I had these same messages on HP Proliant when the support pack (only hp-health and hp-snmp-agents) was not up to date with the firmwares.
 
  


Reply



Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off



Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Error, some other host already uses address xxx.xxx,xxx,xxx ryan462 Linux - Networking 20 01-24-2010 11:14 PM
http://www.spamhaus.org/query/bl?xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx (Server cannot send email now!) RMLinux Linux - Server 3 05-08-2009 02:06 AM
smbclient -M xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx Doesnt Work DiscreetControl Linux - Networking 7 12-28-2007 10:50 AM
How to deal with SSHD invalid user XXXX from www.xxx.yyy.xxx 1kyle SUSE / openSUSE 1 09-30-2006 05:26 AM
Host XXX.XXX.XXX.XXX is not allowed to connect to this MySQL server ocavid Linux - Newbie 2 03-16-2005 09:40 AM

LinuxQuestions.org > Forums > Linux Forums > Linux - Server

All times are GMT -5. The time now is 05:48 AM.

Main Menu
Advertisement
My LQ
Write for LQ
LinuxQuestions.org is looking for people interested in writing Editorials, Articles, Reviews, and more. If you'd like to contribute content, let us know.
Main Menu
Syndicate
RSS1  Latest Threads
RSS1  LQ News
Twitter: @linuxquestions
Open Source Consulting | Domain Registration