Quote:
Originally Posted by jatender2011
i installed fc14 as i like it a lot.
|
That's not an adequate reason. FC14 (laughlin) was released in late 2010. While, for anything, there is the question whether it has current support, for Fedora this is worse because it is deliberately a fast-moving distro that doesn't have the testing (and therefore lack of bugs) that an enterprise distro gets. Some people say that this makes it particularly good for a desktop, but what is clear is that it does nothing to help ion the scenario which you are presenting because it doesn't have the extended support period, so you are going to have to keep updating in order to get support.
Wouldn't something like Centos, which does have extended support periods and does get more thorough testing be more appropriate?
Quote:
Originally Posted by jatender2011
today i want to configure the squid once again for my other client.
but the squid.conf have very limited lines in that...
|
I don't know what this '...my other client...' is; it seems that, if this is relevant, you should have explained something about your network architecture, but maybe it is just not relevant.
This is the first time that I've heard anyone complain that squid.conf doesn't have enough lines in it! The only thing that I can think is that Fedora have chosen to build a cut down version, which only has the major functionality and which does away with some of the fripperies (optional items). This would, therefore, need less configuring and fewer lines in squid.conf.
If it is true that your squid doesn't have the optional functionality, there is nothing that you can do with squid.conf to put that functionality back.
Quote:
Originally Posted by jatender2011
why the lines are less....or the path is different... any help will be highly appreciable...
|
Are you saying that the path to
squid is different, or the path to
squid.conf is different, or something else entirely. If you could list the old path and the new path maybe someone could have a go at guessing why the change has (or hasn't) occurred, but really the more significant question seems to be 'Can you work with what you've got?' which, I would have thought, would have been the case, if you actually know the paths that you've got.