I have recently installed F20 on a new machine. I have also had problems with F20 and Samba.
On researching in various places and doing some of my own experimenting, I see that this is not a single issue. This also correlates with the diverse plethora of complaints I have seen.
I was able to get Filezilla to work through Samba, but so far not Nautilus.
For now I have a work-around that fills the bill temporarily, but that is complex and hardware intensive. I doubt if many users would like to deal with that approach.
Part of this is a fault in the way SELINUX handles authenticating of Samba, and I suspect the problem, or at least part of it is hard coded, and may have to wait until the major developers do a fully compiled respin of the pair as an RPM. That will take a lot of developers' time, so it may never appear in F20.
I have heard it posted that F21 is to have a new core, and so is not expected to arrive until (somebody's guess) about august or September or 2014.
Given what happened with the release of F18, I would be little surprised if that didn't result in F21 being months later than that.
I suggest people experiencing problems with any of these issues do a lot of research, or see if they can set up the whole thing on NFS, adding what they may need to their windows users to access through NFS.
It is also possible that the problem might bre solved with a NAS box that can be accessed simultaneously from an embedded Samba server and an embedded NFS server simultaneously, or by using 2 NAS boxes, bilaterally cross-synced, one for each.
In such a case, the traffic is apt to be heavy, so the 2 NAS boxes might well be placed on the Lower side of a Gb. managed switch, so as not to impose the cross-sync traffic on the main network.
Bruce from Canada
[QUOTE=Teckno;4349454]I'm just trying to set up a simple file server on my OpenIndiana box, but no matter what tutorial or smb.conf setting I seem to try I get the same problem.
First, my latest smb.conf:
Code:
[global]
netbios name = CASPER
workgroup = LAN
server string = File Server
log file = /var/samba/log/smbd.log
max log size = 100
encrypt passwords = yes
smb passwd file = /etc/samba/smbpasswd
security = share
unix password sync = Yes
passwd program = /usr/bin/passwd %u
passwd chat = *New*UNIX*password* %n\n *ReType*new*UNIX*password* %n\n *passwd:*all*authentication*tokens*updated*successfully*
socket options = TCP_NODELAY SO_RCVBUF=8192 SO_SNDBUF=8192
[media]
comment = Media Files
path = /share/media
public = yes
read only = no
[sam]
comment = Sams Files
path = /share/userfiles/sam
valid users = sam
public = no
writable = yes
printable = no
I also made sure to add both the unix user and smb user to the server. I have the same user name "sam" on my windows desktop, and ubuntu laptop, and I used the same password. Ive tested the accounts and they seem to work fine. I can login to the unix account and samba shows that it has a user named sam
The problem:
The server and shares show up just fine, and the media share is readable (not writable but that most likely just a permission thing and not the issue at hand). The problem is with the private share "sam", heres what happens:
Local Test:
Quote:
sam@casper:~$ /usr/bin/smbclient //192.168.0.1/sam
Enter sam's password:
Connection to 192.168.0.1 failed (Error NT_STATUS_CONNECTION_REFUSED)[/CODE]
From my Ubuntu laptop:
And from my Windows Vista desktop I just get a login unsuccessful message.
My /var/samba/log/smbd.log is filled with these:
Code:
[2011/05/07 13:46:32.075667, 1] smbd/service.c:677(make_connection_snum)
create_connection_server_info failed: NT_STATUS_WRONG_PASSWORD
[2011/05/07 13:46:32.079670, 1] smbd/service.c:677(make_connection_snum)
create_connection_server_info failed: NT_STATUS_WRONG_PASSWORD
[2011/05/07 13:46:32.086242, 1] smbd/service.c:677(make_connection_snum)
create_connection_server_info failed: NT_STATUS_WRONG_PASSWORD
and yes, I triple checked all the passwords.
From my tests it seems that samba refuses to use any sort of user other then the guest account.
I tried it with "security = user" but run into the same issue, just when I connect to the server instead of the share, so it efectivlly blocks me from the media share as well.
Im probably missing something simple thats preventing the authentication, anyone care to point it out?
Thank you
|