[SOLVED] RHEL5 won't boot from LUN ID 1, where can I change it?
Linux - ServerThis forum is for the discussion of Linux Software used in a server related context.
Notices
Welcome to LinuxQuestions.org, a friendly and active Linux Community.
You are currently viewing LQ as a guest. By joining our community you will have the ability to post topics, receive our newsletter, use the advanced search, subscribe to threads and access many other special features. Registration is quick, simple and absolutely free. Join our community today!
Note that registered members see fewer ads, and ContentLink is completely disabled once you log in.
RHEL5 won't boot from LUN ID 1, where can I change it?
This one's complicated,at least to me.
I'm trying to get RHEL5.3 booting on an IBM Blade off a SAN disk, but it refuses.
Our storage is presented on LUN 1 as due to the IBM XIV SAN, we cannot use LUN 0 when presenting volumes. We believe that when the installer tries to configure the boot LUN, it expects to see it on LUN 0 but we can't use that. This leads to a problem where after installed Red Hat, it asks me to remove the CD and reboot, but doesn't load anything other than a cursor blinking at me on the monitor.
I currently can't change the LUN ID on the SAN, so I've been trying to amend things to get it to work with no joy. Can anyone help?
I'm trying to get RHEL5.3 booting on an IBM Blade off a SAN disk, but it refuses.
Our storage is presented on LUN 1 as due to the IBM XIV SAN, we cannot use LUN 0 when presenting volumes. We believe that when the installer tries to configure the boot LUN, it expects to see it on LUN 0 but we can't use that. This leads to a problem where after installed Red Hat, it asks me to remove the CD and reboot, but doesn't load anything other than a cursor blinking at me on the monitor.
I currently can't change the LUN ID on the SAN, so I've been trying to amend things to get it to work with no joy. Can anyone help?
We can probably muddle through it on here, but your best and quickest solution would be to get IBM's help. Seriously, you're using their blades and SAN, and they do support RHEL as a 'supported' configuration. Their tech support (which you are paying handsomely for...), should be held accountable, if things aren't working.
I found the issue, the problem was that the SAN guy presented the disk as multipath for the OS install. Once it was presented down a single path, it installed perfectly.
LinuxQuestions.org is looking for people interested in writing
Editorials, Articles, Reviews, and more. If you'd like to contribute
content, let us know.