Linux - ServerThis forum is for the discussion of Linux Software used in a server related context.
Notices
Welcome to LinuxQuestions.org, a friendly and active Linux Community.
You are currently viewing LQ as a guest. By joining our community you will have the ability to post topics, receive our newsletter, use the advanced search, subscribe to threads and access many other special features. Registration is quick, simple and absolutely free. Join our community today!
Note that registered members see fewer ads, and ContentLink is completely disabled once you log in.
If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us. If you need to reset your password, click here.
Having a problem logging in? Please visit this page to clear all LQ-related cookies.
Get a virtual cloud desktop with the Linux distro that you want in less than five minutes with Shells! With over 10 pre-installed distros to choose from, the worry-free installation life is here! Whether you are a digital nomad or just looking for flexibility, Shells can put your Linux machine on the device that you want to use.
Exclusive for LQ members, get up to 45% off per month. Click here for more info.
I have agreed to set up a server to run an existing website from a hosted solution. This is no problem I have setup Centos 5.5 64 bit, all running OK. The existing site is single directory HTML with a very small amount of Java script.
The user has no technical knowledge and would like to be able to go in and modify their site, sadly vim is not an option
Has anyone got any suggestion of single or multi site CMS solutions that are easy to set up and use. I would also need to import the existing site. I do not have weeks to spend learning a new product at the moment though I would love to do so.
...Joomla is quite nice, and pretty (relatively) by default, but their security rep isn't the best. This can probably be managed, but do you have the time to do that, as your client won't be doing it?
Drupal is still good, but not so attractive by default (although that can be fixed) and probably a bit more of a learning curve (all CMSs are quite complex and to imagine one with no learning curve is unrealistic). security rep is better than Joomla! though.
Plone is probably a bit more professional still, but demands a lot of your hardware - ie, is slower on equivalent hardware (but again, this can probably be managed or 'architected' out of the way, at least for low usage sites)
And one outside bet...Wordpress is becoming more CMS-like; it used to be purely a blogging platform but is incorporating CMS features, so could be a possibility. it is probably a bit more difficult to make a Wordpress site not look like a generic Wordpress site, though. From what I understand, short learning curve, at least to get going, though.
A question for you: How will you install? If it is from repos, check the state of up-to-dateness of the versions in your repos. You do not want to be depending on a version with known exploits against it. If from a stack, some stacks are worse than others in security terms (and you have to do all of the updating/keeping up with status yourself).
Last edited by salasi; 11-16-2010 at 03:53 PM.
Reason: ...non functional shift key...
Looking into it pretty is not a major issue but must be usable, Security is always a major factor and as I had planned to manage packages with yum then Drupal looks like the most likely option.
Drupals latest versions are included in EPEL!
I have tried various ways of using Wordpress (should have mentioned that), though the html import option didn't work that well, and Salasli said its difficult to not look like a blogging site.
I'd say on balance I'll give Drupal a go, but without hurrying it in. I'll also have play with Mambo out of interest.
One disadvantage with Drupal that I should have mentioned earlier is that there is a major version change coming. If you want to go live soon, you should learn and develop on 6.xx now and understand that a transition to 7.xx will come along sometime soon and that is a relatively big change,.
If you have a looser schedule to go live, maybe you can get away with ignoring 6.xx.That is one fewer transition to make, but your timing becomes at the mercy of unpredictable external factors
LinuxQuestions.org is looking for people interested in writing
Editorials, Articles, Reviews, and more. If you'd like to contribute
content, let us know.