Welcome to the most active Linux Forum on the web.
Go Back > Forums > Linux Forums > Linux - Server
User Name
Linux - Server This forum is for the discussion of Linux Software used in a server related context.


  Search this Thread
Old 04-17-2009, 09:01 AM   #1
LQ Newbie
Registered: Oct 2008
Posts: 3

Rep: Reputation: 0
Question? What is the best Disaster Recovery Plan?

This is a question out for all the RHEL and CentOS guru's and admins.

For weeks I've been trying out various Bare-Metal and Backup Rescue systems, and nothing seems to fit.

Here is my setup (basically):
CentOS 5.2

1 Tyan Tiger in Raid 5 - Mission Critical Production Server
1 Tyan Tiger unused clone of this system for parts
1 Tyan Tiger with 2 drives as raid 1 and one as tape storage for Bacula
4 HP ProLiant blades in raid 1 (mirror)- 1 mission critical

What worries me is, are these systems protected enough by the presence of RAID disks?

The Bacula server backs up all non-OS data daily from all critical machines.

Do I need a Bare-Metal Recovery plan on the raid 1 and raid 5 systems?
What would you (the other admins out there) do in this scenario?
Old 04-17-2009, 09:49 AM   #2
Registered: Feb 2007
Distribution: RHEL 4, SOLARIS 10
Posts: 91

Rep: Reputation: 15
RAID won't help if the building burns down.

Also, multiple disk failures are not unheard of (especially if the unit overheats for some reason) and can lead to total data loss despite RAID.

I backup to tape and keep a copy offsite for all critical production data.

Now, "bare-metal" backups are often silly because generally you have to install the operating system to restore the "bare-metal" backups anyway.
Back up your non-OS data and configuration settings, should be good.

IMHO, of course.
Old 04-17-2009, 09:53 AM   #3
LQ Guru
Registered: May 2005
Location: Atlanta Georgia USA
Distribution: Redhat (RHEL), CentOS, Fedora, Debian, FreeBSD, HP-UX, Solaris, SCO
Posts: 6,222
Blog Entries: 9

Rep: Reputation: 835Reputation: 835Reputation: 835Reputation: 835Reputation: 835Reputation: 835Reputation: 835
RAID != backup!

RAID *helps* you to avoid needing to restore but it CAN fail so you always want to have a backup. I've seen two disks in RAID 5 die at same time which means the entire RAID 5 is dead. I've also seen bogus data go into the primary drive of a RAID 1 mirror. Since the data was at fault and not the hardware then the mirror drive also got the bogus data. In such a case you'd need to restore.

Most DR plans assume that not only your hardware but your entire data center may be kaput in a real "disaster". As such they usually not only have backing up the data but also sending it off site. Companies like Iron Mountain are around for storing your offsite data (and even picking it up if you're using tape).
Old 04-18-2009, 09:16 AM   #4
Registered: Feb 2007
Distribution: RHEL 4, SOLARIS 10
Posts: 91

Rep: Reputation: 15
If you don't have a large number of tapes, a safety deposit box at a bank works quite nicely.


backup, centos5, disaster, raid, recovery

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
disaster recovery dea214 Linux - Newbie 2 04-01-2008 08:15 PM
Disaster Recovery Plan y2kram SUSE / openSUSE 17 12-21-2007 09:55 AM
disaster and recovery SolarisZen Linux - Hardware 1 12-21-2007 06:50 AM
Disaster Recovery kalyanofb Programming 8 09-02-2007 12:47 PM
disaster plan: raid + lvm nmayotte Linux - Software 2 04-18-2006 02:23 PM

All times are GMT -5. The time now is 12:44 PM.

Main Menu
Write for LQ is looking for people interested in writing Editorials, Articles, Reviews, and more. If you'd like to contribute content, let us know.
Main Menu
RSS1  Latest Threads
RSS1  LQ News
Twitter: @linuxquestions
Facebook: linuxquestions Google+: linuxquestions
Open Source Consulting | Domain Registration